ManniKaltz
New Member
Philipp Hofmann returns to Schalke; he was on loan at Ingolstadt last season.
The bolded part is correct.I thought the co-ownership changes were in effect as of now? However the existing co-ownership contracts will remain functional. I may be wrong though.
As for Immobile, Di Marzio is reporting it so I'm inclined to believe it. Deal is worth €19,5m and Immobile will fly to Dortmund in the weekend to sign the contract.
They have like a year cooling off period. So it will impact transfers only next year.The rule changes in regards to co-ownerships could have helped to solve the problems between Juve and Torino quickly. Torino probably doesn't have the money to buy him from Juve and now that these types of co-ownerships are forbidden from 2015 onwards, it might have become important to sell him for both clubs.
Well, I only put official signings in the topic, but I don't mind rumor discussion in here at all! Struggling to see how he'd fit in, squad player I guess.
Bayern and Dortmund are doing a fine job. Schalke looks really underwhelming at the moment. I dont really rate any of their new players. That said, they already have an insane amount of talent. Leverkusen situation is weird. I think they are gambling quite a bit. Consiering Hertha BSC Berlin´s situation, their transfers look solid. Frankfurt looks like they are doing a step backwards.Who do we think has done the best business so far? Poor Nurnberg, they seem to be losing a lot of players at the moment. Luckily they have a few decent young players coming through.
Kramer and Ginter made the German team. Even if they don't play, surely rumours and maybe bids will follow. Thoughts on either for us? Van Gaal might lean Bundesliga. I've only seen Kramer play. Looked solid defensively.
BILD Stories this morning:
- Tin Jedvaj (AS Roma) appears to be joining Leverkusen.
- Daniel Ginczek and Adam Hlousek (Nurnberg) are joining Stuttgart.
- Christopher Avevor is leaving Hannover to join... Berlin (I think) also mentions Dusseldorf in the article? Can someone clarify?
Marvin Ducksh joins newly promoted Paderborn on loan from Dortmund. Good deal for both parties, he`d finally be able to play on a regular basis.
Dortmund are doing pretty well in the market, aren't they? Not sure if they need Ginter all that much since they already gave Sokratis, Hummels and Subotic but they've had plenty of issues with injuries at the back plus Hummels might leave sooner rather than later. If they sell Hummels and get Ginter for the reported fee they'll have probably netted a profit of around €30m which would come handy when strengthening other areas.I read SC Freiburg was going to hold a press conference over Ginter's future today.
It is widely expected that they will announce his departure to Dortmund for a rumored transfer fee of € 10-13M.
He could've left last summer already but BVB wanted to keep him, Bayern were throwing something around 30 mil Euro for him.
Dortmund are doing pretty well in the market, aren't they? Not sure if they need Ginter all that much since they already gave Sokratis, Hummels and Subotic but they've had plenty of issues with injuries at the back plus Hummels might leave sooner rather than later. If they sell Hummels and get Ginter for the reported fee they'll have probably netted a profit of around €30m which would come handy when strengthening other areas.
Let's see how Immobile does for them. He's supposed to be pretty good.
Not true. Dortmund said we didn't offer anything. Dortmund would have sold him for this amount of money. I believe we just offered something about 15-20 mil for him because he was running out of contract.
The situation was actually very simple: Zorc demanded a written offer by Bayern, not verbally or via a middle man, before a certain due date. Bayern didn't do this, and the case was closed.No I think we would have paid the price for lewandowski last season, while we made no official bid (we never do unless we're certain it's accepted), we certainly informed Watzke about our willingness to sign him for something between 25 and 30M.
However Watzke, and his later apology to Lewandowski, his new wage offer to the Pole and his admission of guilt make this clear, wanted to prove a point by stopping the transfer of Götze and Lewandowski in the same summer.
Believing the transfer failed, because of a couple of million or a lack of an official offer is naive.
The situation was actually very simple: Zorc demanded a written offer by Bayern, not verbally or via a middle man, before a certain due date. Bayern didn't do this, and the case was closed.
No I think we would have paid the price for lewandowski last season, while we made no official bid (we never do unless we're certain it's accepted), we certainly informed Watzke about our willingness to sign him for something between 25 and 30M.
However Watzke, and his later apology to Lewandowski, his new wage offer to the Pole and his admission of guilt make this clear, wanted to prove a point by stopping the transfer of Götze and Lewandowski in the same summer.
Believing the transfer failed, because of a couple of million or a lack of an official offer is naive.
Philipp Hofmann returns to Schalke; he was on loan at Ingolstadt last season.
That is your own suggestion. However the only fact is that Zorc said 'Bayern did not offer anything to us" and we (Bayern) didn't even complain about that statement.
My suggestion in there is: "Because of the situation (Lewandowski only wants to come to us and his contract is running out) we thought we can get him for a small fee (15-20m). If not we just wait to get him for free, our sqad is full anyways.
Same old, same old ... Gündogan played 56 minutes last season, he has actually been already gone.The drop in the overall technical skill of the team caused by Gotze and Kagawa leaving is going to hurt them untill they sort it out. With Gundogans back issues, this will only get worse. Its all good an well running with the ball at 100km an hour but you also need players who can play in tight spaces, and IMO they simply don't have enough of those.
Since Rummenigge's public response to Zorc was that Bayern in general never makes written offers, neither for Lewandowski nor for anyone else, I tend to believe that Zorc is correct. Nobody from Bayern ever rejected anything Zorc said.All your speculation and suggestion is relatively worthless when faced with Watzke statement that he himself stopped Lewandowski's transfer to Bayern.
Here the German version for you:
"Natürlich habe ich mich mit unserem Sportdirektor Michael Zorc und Trainer Jürgen Klopp beraten, aber letztendlich ist es vor allem meine Entscheidung gewesen, dass er beim BVB bleibt."
Not a lack of Bayern's interest, not a too low offer, not a missing written document. HIS decision alone. That's his quote and not made up by me. Zorc's statement came much earlier when they were still fighting a PR battle after the lost CL final and maybe even hoping for a Lewandowski transfer abroad. Bayern was well aware that countering Zorc's words or starting transfer negotiations with a written offer could give Dortmund more ammunition for their PR smear campaign which was going on in the wake of the Götze transfer. However I seem to recall some Rummenigge statements where he clearly emphasizes that Bayern was willing to make a sizeable offer and just wasn't willing to open transfer negotiations with a written offer in that kind of intense and toxic environment.
I can't believe this 'lack of a written offer' fairytale is still in circulation...