People have tried this before where he has been compared to similar players, but somehow people don't want to change their opinion. Bruno's isn't disposessed more than similar players; his passing isn't more erratic, and he doesn't lose every tackle he engages in, like some would argue. According to stats, he's a very good and expansive passer; he works his socks off every game, wins the ball back more than players in a similar position and manages to come up with similar or better stats for goals and assists whilst playing in a far inferior team.
Stats are funny though - some years back posters argued that Carrick only had a high passing completion rate because all of his passes were sideways or backwards, but I think stats showed he played more forward passes than Xavi - not arguing he was a more expansive passer than Xavi, but still. People still won't change their mind.
The eye test would confirm that Bruno is a very good passer - he is a very expansive passer; some of those don't come off, sometimes due to a poor pass, but also sometimes due to a misunderstanding or sometimes down to a terrible run and decision making from a teammate.
Anyone arguing he doesn't work hard are taking the piss, but they do exist. Bruno regularly covers the most distance, and also regularly he wins the ball back deep into his own half. He's not great at defending, but sometimes just being there and getting a toe to the ball is enough to disrupt the flow from the attacking team.
He's a brilliant player, and in a better team where other players than him create more chances and manage to score, he would have even greater numbers, and he probably wouldn't have the responsibility of having to create everything for the team. United are currently quite useless without him.