Reiver
Full Member
He has to play in the forward line, ideally just behind the striker. That's where he's at his best and can really influence a game.
Agreed, should also be banned from dropping deepHe has to play in the forward line, ideally just behind the striker. That's where he's at his best and can really influence a game.
He has to play in the forward line, ideally just behind the striker. That's where he's at his best and can really influence a game.
If he can't lead the team then why be a captain? Why we play on transition? His main attribute.Why are you waiting for one player to lead us anywhere?
That's part of your problem right there.
I've said multiple times..Not sure why you're ommiting his goals in the cup competitions, or all of his assists. But sure - because he's our captain, the context of all other players around him should be dismissed, as he alone is responsible for our failure to win the top trophies.
Can he stop taking corners? Mount has better deliveries but he still takes every fecking corner.
If he can't lead the team then why be a captain?
You can find my comment from pre season saying "any manager that thinks pushing Bruno away from lone #10 and deeper into midfield is a good idea deserves a sack".
I can't believe ETH has been here for over a year and still tries those tricks. Moving him away from #10 is a crime. Either play him in pure attacking role that he is effective at, or find a setup without Bruno as focal point. We have the squad to do it. But I also think this solution doesn't include Scott McTominay so what do I know.
That is a difficult discussion. Bruno is catch 22, yes he will create chances but will also lose the ball very often. So basically if you base you game on Bruno, it's always a calculated risk. Also, because of the way we play and have no patterns of play, it looks like Bruno is the only one capable of creating chances. I don't think that is true, not with Eriksen and Mount not in the team.I would go even further any Manager who thinks This Club could progress as a team and play good cohesive football with Bruno as regular is destined to fail and isn't good enough any way as he can't even figure out why we are the way we are .
That is a difficult discussion. Bruno is catch 22, yes he will create chances but will also lose the ball very often. So basically if you base you game on Bruno, it's always a calculated risk. Also, because of the way we play and have no patterns of play, it looks like Bruno is the only one capable of creating chances. I don't think that is true, not with Eriksen and Mount not in the team.
I would be fine if we played 4231 with Bruno as focal point if we're fixing other issues all around and plan for a formation switch. In that light I still think Mount will come good. However, what I think is complete lunacy is moving Bruno away from attacking role. He is an useless midfielder.
Playing McTominay as a second striker in front of Bruno I think deserves a minute of silence for the death of football.
There are a few things he can do now, especially in midfield he can try different setups. So far he's been doing the same thing, but trying different players. But it's funny that actually 4231 with Eriksen saves his ass again.I agree Playing Bruno anywhere other than where he is at his best is complete lunacy because If can't get his goals and assists then what even is the point of him in the team and Playing Mctominay as a second striker just reeks of the Man who has lost the plot completely and is begging to be put out of his misery .
I don't hold much expectation from Ten Hag any more but what I am really hoping is that he shows some courage and give some of Our youngsters a fair and extended run in the team to see if they can hack especially some new blood in the midfield who knows it might just save his job .
I would also like for him to go back to 4231 with Casemiro, Eriksen and Mount with explicit instructions for Casemiro to Sit and hold for the time being and Start easing in Mainoo and Gore in deeper roles and Mejbri as sub for Mount may not work but What do we have to lose anymore .There are a few things he can do now, especially in midfield he can try different setups. So far he's been doing the same thing, but trying different players. But it's funny that actually 4231 with Eriksen saves his ass again.
We can play 433 with either Casemiro/ Amrabat holding and Eriksen - Mount in front. That midfield 3 on paper has enough creativity and legs as long as they all stay as an actual midfield block (that hasn't been the case so far as the two advanced midfielders have been part of the attacking formation). If Bruno really needs to be on the pitch, then play him RW. I quite like him there as long as he stays wide rather than get into the way of Eriksen and Mount.I would also like for him to go back to 4231 with Casemiro, Eriksen and Mount with explicit instructions for Casemiro to Sit and hold for the time being and Start easing in Mainoo and Gore in deeper roles and Mejbri as sub for Mount may not work but What do we have to lose anymore .
I don't think anyone is suggesting that any of our players are performing well, but the difference is that Bruno and Rashford always plays. I mean, clearly, whatever we are doing isn't working and it hasn't for years, so why not try to change our way of playing? We've relied on Bruno and Rashford for so long that we've forgotten how it is like to play together as a team, where moments of magic aren't the essence of our game. We've played a bunch of different midfielders with Bruno, and it's not working with either of them. Maybe a few matches here and there, but not consistently. Maybe the problem isn't every other player in our team, but the ones who try to force things and don't look to play with their team mates?
I'm not exactly looking to change your mind, but surely you can see this isn't working?
Ten Hag is allergic to playing him in his best position.He has to play in the forward line, ideally just behind the striker. That's where he's at his best and can really influence a game.
I was giving him the first half of that season. As for the stats there’s 13 penalties in that 28. We’ve not had that many penalties in the entire time since that season. It’s an outlier and we see since that he’s generally an 8/9 goals and 8/9 assists player.
That being said my post was in response to someone saying his ‘form’ at the start of the season….well that’s not quite the case. His form has been the same for years. The outlier is sometimes in the stats but his performances don’t vary too much. Mostly poor performances 9 games out of 10 and the odd run of 3/4 good games…but not many.
1. I think we’ve been treated terribly by officials ever since Klopps comments.Two questions:
DDG - Handful of stinkers, few incredible saves, mixed distribution - POOR
- Do you think we've had more/less/the right amount of penalties since Klopp's outburst? Anyway, Bruno's stats are good, you've already referenced that in the past.
- Maybe I've been unfair on your binary usage of 'poor' vs 'good', how do Bruno's 9/12 game poor performances (as per the above) compare to other members in our squad, in your opinion? Tried to reflect your objective view to individual player performance below...
Shaw - Extremely low G/A despite playing on our most attacking side, downed tools vs Salah and Saka, had a handful of outstanding performances - POOR
Martinez - Played well until December, never looked the same following the World Cup until injury - POOR
Varane - Injured all the time, can't really say somebody's had a good season if they are barely available - POOR
Casemiro - Came in sloppy, had some great games, banned twice, worst player on the pitch on numerous occasions - POOR
Eriksen - Only played half the season through injury, was pedestrian vs energetic sides - POOR
Bruno - Low pass completion, forced the squad to play a specific way - POOR
Rashford - Barely scored from January onwards - POOR
Antony, AWB, Fred, Garnacho, Lindelof, Maguire, Martial, McTominay, Sancho, Weghorst also receive POOR ratings, which reflected in the team's performance: 3rd in the league and 2 cup finals is NOT the benchmark.
What exactly is his system though?My heart sinks every time he gives away a high risk / low reward pass and brings the opposition onto us. It’s not an uncommon occurrence during matches.
Seems to me the deeper he is, the greater that risk is.
He’s either being played in the wrong position, or isn’t the right player for ETH’s system.
Has been a great servant to us, a joy to watch, and a great antidote to some of the rotten players we’ve employed in recent times.
But if he can’t play his best position, and isn’t mature enough to be more measured from deeeper, then perhaps he deserves to play his football somewhere where he can play his best.