Scandi Red
Hates Music.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2022
- Messages
- 6,548
Played well. Scored a penalty, hit a very dangerous free kick, sent Garnacho 1 on 1
His best pass was in the first half. Unfortunately Rashford was at the end of it.
Played well. Scored a penalty, hit a very dangerous free kick, sent Garnacho 1 on 1
44 out of 51 passes completed today, so naturally we'll see limited activity on this thread for a little while.Felt he had a good game today.
Thought I'd check out his stats to see how it compares to the eye test and they're good, hopefully he's coming into a bit of form now.
5 shots, 3 on target
5 key passes
86.3% pass accuracy
So if Bruno can increase his assists output for the past 28 games by 140% in the remaining 10 games he will have done well. If he can get more assists in the next ten games than he got in the entire of last season or the entire of the season before that, he’s done well. If his aunty had bollocks.
Nine assists so far this season. If he can get 7 more assists in our remaining 11 games then he will be in the top 10 for most ever PL assists in a season. Which would be absolutely fecking hilarious considering how poor the players he's creating for have been playing for most of this season and the abuse he's been getting in this thread.
A bit of a long shot though, admittedly...
His best pass was in the first half. Unfortunately Rashford was at the end of it.
Was that the season Pogba started only 14 more games and registered 4 more assists? 9 in total from 16 starts. 1 more in total than Bruno has managed in 37 and 36 games the last two seasons.Remember when Pogba had like 5 in the first 3 games and still didn't make this list.
Calm down sunshine. Nobody is blaming Garnacho and Hojlund for our low goal tally this season (although it is common knowledge that Hojlund started slowly in the PL this season). We've needed our more experienced attackers like Rashford and Antony to contribute with more goals and they haven't, despite Bruno creating plenty of chances for them.So if Bruno can increase his assists output for the past 28 games by 140% in the remaining 10 games he will have done well. If he can get more assists in the next ten games than he got in the entire of last season or the entire of the season before that, he’s done well. If his aunty had bollocks.
Funny though that Garnacho and Hojlund are to blame. Right.
So people criticise when he doesn’t have a good game?44 out of 51 passes completed today, so naturally we'll see limited activity on this thread for a little while.
Calm down sunshine. Nobody is blaming Garnacho and Hojlund for our low goal tally this season (although it is common knowledge that Hojlund started slowly in the PL this season). We've needed our more experienced attackers like Rashford and Antony to contribute with more goals and they haven't, despite Bruno creating plenty of chances for them.
Calm down sunshine…Epic opening line!Calm down sunshine. Nobody is blaming Garnacho and Hojlund for our low goal tally this season (although it is common knowledge that Hojlund started slowly in the PL this season). We've needed our more experienced attackers like Rashford and Antony to contribute with more goals and they haven't, despite Bruno creating plenty of chances for them.
So people criticise when he doesn’t have a good game?
He had a decent game. Nothing special to lavish praises. When he does that, surely people will do that too. There is no conspiracy against him.
He was hardly feeding off scraps every game. We saw him miss quite a few chances that he should've buried.Common knowledge Hojlund wasn't getting any service
I'm not saying that there's a conspiracy against him. I'm merely pointing out that some of the frequent posters on this thread are quick to point the finger at him for minor things (arm waving, a misplaced pass etc) but are reluctant to praise him when he's had a good game.So people criticise when he doesn’t have a good game?
He had a decent game. Nothing special to lavish praises. When he does that, surely people will do that too. There is no conspiracy against him.
So you? I mean, you have the 6th highest post count on here.He was hardly feeding off scraps every game. We saw him miss quite a few chances that he should've buried.
I'm not saying that there's a conspiracy against him. I'm merely pointing out that some of the frequent posters on this thread are quick to point the finger at him for minor things (arm waving, a misplaced pass etc) but are reluctant to praise him when he's had a good game.
I said "some of the frequent posters on here", not "all of the top 10 posters on here". Hardly the 'gotcha' moment that you think it is.So you? I mean, you have the 6th highest post count on here.
He created two or three very good openings for our attackers - that lofted ball for Rashford was perfectly weighted and he really should've scored from it. He also had that high pass completion percentage that the usual suspects on here frequently bang on about. Apparently if we replaced Bruno with a midfielder who was capable of getting 80-90% pass completion then we would have more control over games, but all that today's game showed was that there are more significant reasons as to why we don't control games.I also don't know what constitutes a good game for you. His pen was good, his freekick was fine but saved. Apart from that, did he do much more than McNeil?
He was left in the dust today at least twice by McNeil and once by their CB pushing up. If there wasn't such a high chance, that he has some form issues at the moment, I'd say he is in serious decline physically. Might as well be a toll from his millionth games without a break.
One of the main reasons for Højlunds issues is Bruno refusing to give him any serviceCalm down sunshine. Nobody is blaming Garnacho and Hojlund for our low goal tally this season (although it is common knowledge that Hojlund started slowly in the PL this season). We've needed our more experienced attackers like Rashford and Antony to contribute with more goals and they haven't, despite Bruno creating plenty of chances for them.
He's had 9 assists so far this season. Let's not pretend that he's creating chances for his mate Rashford but refusing to provide any service to his centre forward.One of the main reasons for Højlunds issues is Bruno refusing to give him any service
Not out here for a gotcha moment really. I just find it a little odd, when you point out the limited activity after an uneventful game. I would see your point, when he really stood out today, but he didn't really. Obviously that is subjective to a degree but I guess, the activity level on here at least indicates that the majority of people thought he was alright but nothing worth pointing out.I said "some of the frequent posters on here", not "all of the top 10 posters on here". Hardly the 'gotcha' moment that you think it is.
I think, you are misinterpreting the main issue that people have. People aren't crying out for somebody with 90% pass completion. The pass completion is just one stat that often highlights the issue many people have with Bruno which is being too careless with the ball. He certainly didn't show that level of carelessness today and I think in the last match but on the same hand, he didn't really offer that much due to that. I am fine with that, personally - pretty sure he wouldn't have as many critics if he played like that most of the time. Pretty sure, people who want him replaced would also be fine having somebody with less key passes and a comparable pass completion rate as long as the new guy is more aware of when to get risky and when not and the new guy is a little more secure on the ball.He created two or three very good openings for our attackers - that lofted ball for Rashford was perfectly weighted and he really should've scored from it. He also had that high pass completion percentage that the usual suspects on here frequently bang on about. Apparently if we replaced Bruno with a midfielder who was capable of getting 80-90% pass completion then we would have more control over games, but all that today's game showed was that there are more significant reasons as to why we don't control games.
He's had 9 assists so far this season. Let's not pretend that he's creating chances for his mate Rashford but refusing to provide any service to his centre forward.
I've got no issues with Hojlund by the way. He's already one my favourite strikers we've signed over the last 20 years. I think he snatched at a few of his chances when he first arrived, which is to be expected of any 20 year old during their first few months in the PL.
more aware of when to get risky and when not
What? when has Mctominay ever had a game where he's completed 44 out of 51 attempted passes? We're lucky if we get 44 touches out of Mctominay in 90 minutes!This... simple as that!!
Today there were a number of times when he's received the ball with United breaking forward under no real pressure and he chose to take a very safe option instead of a relatively low risk forward pass to free team mate, that you would expect from one of your, if not, most creative players.
Other times he did a good impression of Scott as an AM. Btw I felt Scott did a good impression of himself today, as an attacking mid. No quality or composure from the both of them going forward on several occasions!
Would love to see Amad given a chance, in Bruno's role. But Ten Hag does seem very reluctant to play the lad for some unknown reason.
I am surprised by the positive comments for Bruno today. He is the fecking captain and towards the end of the first half he gave one of the laziest, half drunk passes in the general direction of Casemiro IN OUR OWN BOX!!! It was so incredibly stupid, and I really wish someone would have screamed at him Rooney to Nani style.This... simple as that!!
Today there were a number of times when he's received the ball with United breaking forward under no real pressure and he chose to take a very safe option instead of a relatively low risk forward pass to free team mate, that you would expect from one of your, if not, most creative players.
Other times he did a good impression of Scott as an AM. Btw I felt Scott did a good impression of himself today, as an attacking mid. No quality or composure from the both of them going forward on several occasions!
Would love to see Amad given a chance, in Bruno's role. But Ten Hag does seem very reluctant to play the lad for some unknown reason.
You will only get the stats where he created most 'chances'Ia there a stat how many times he lost the ball/got dispossessed?
That's the problem with such fallen standards, less crap is deemed acceptable.I must have watched a different game as I thought he was less crap than usual...but still crap.
Do you think his numbers are good this season or indeed over the last three?Good performance. On course to get into double figures for goals AND assists again. You can debate his style of play and whether he'd fit into a more possession based team but you can't argue against the numbers he's made since joining United.
Nah I like Bruno but this is a poor defence. He should have been creating far more and better chances for Hojland. What chances should he have buried btw. Statistically he’s been one of the most lethal players in the league this season.He was hardly feeding off scraps every game. We saw him miss quite a few chances that he should've buried.
I'm not saying that there's a conspiracy against him. I'm merely pointing out that some of the frequent posters on this thread are quick to point the finger at him for minor things (arm waving, a misplaced pass etc) but are reluctant to praise him when he's had a good game.
Off the top of my head, that 1v1 chance in the first half vs Palace, that 1v1 in the first half vs City where his touch was too heavy, and that 1v1 at Anfield that he hit straight at Alisson.Nah I like Bruno but this is a poor defence. He should have been creating far more and better chances for Hojland. What chances should he have buried btw. Statistically he’s been one of the most lethal players in the league this season.
I personally don’t think any of those were clear chances and were being overanalysed because of his goal record at the time. If your striker is getting 3 chances in half a season that points to systemic issues anyway. Bruno has struggled to find him all season. It’s been surprising to be honest because Bruno loves direct runs and Hojland provides them.Off the top of my head, that 1v1 chance in the first half vs Palace, that 1v1 in the first half vs City where his touch was too heavy, and that 1v1 at Anfield that he hit straight at Alisson.
Before people jump on my case - I can't remember who assisted any of those missed chances. Perhaps the stats show that Bruno created nothing for Hojlund. I'd just be very surprised if that was the case considering he tops the charts for chances created in the PL.
Just read that Odegaard could misplace 150 passes and still have higher pass accuracy than Bruno this season
This guy isn’t appreciated enough. His best season for us beats the likes of Son, Manes, hazards and others and that’s in a poor United team.
That seems like a bit of a pointless stat. Ødegaard plays a different role and position, for a team that has outperformed us in probably every positive metric there is. It's an unfair comparison by nature.
I remember a Swansea CM in the PL 10-15 years ago who had 98% pass accuracy or something crazy like that. He could also probably have misplaced 150 passes and still done better than Ødegaard. And he played for a much shittier team and had a role closer to Ødegaard's. And now I can't even remember his name. That's the problem with these possession stats.