Member 125398
Guest
Jesus H ChristThe guy just sprays and prays:
Jesus H ChristThe guy just sprays and prays:
Willian is not better than Antony/Sancho.
Most likely not, although his body may feel fine and like he can keep up with this crazy pace I don't think his mind is able to keep up with it, mental fatigue has been very evident recently, would be great news if he gets the 2 weeks rest.No convenient niggle to get out of NT games? Take a rest Bruno. You need it.
To be fair at the time they had amazing streak of successes in possesion-perfect players like AWB, Maguire and Fred.These the same scouts who at the time were berated for being wrong basically all the time, to the point they were bordering on inept?
Oh that's right, they left because they were absolute rubbish.
"Should have listened to the scouts"
Hilariously bad take number 708 in this thread
These the same scouts who at the time were berated for being wrong basically all the time, to the point they were bordering on inept?
Jesus H Christ
So because they've been wrong before does it mean they can never be right? We're having that discussion here. Right now. Bruno being careless with the ball isn't something people have dreamt up. It's a fact.
The only point of contention is can we get to a higher level with him and/or if whatever else people think he offers is worth it/can't be offered by a player that is more press resistant and more cultured on the ball.
That's exactly what he does. Some of the passes he attempts can only be described as "Inshallah".
I mean, these are quotes from the guy:
"I will lose a lot of balls, I will miss a lot of passes but I know when I find my strikers and wingers, they will score."
"Sometimes I know the pass is difficult or the chance to get in is not quite there, but I want to respect the movement of my strikers"
as I said - spray and pray
Football's a subjective game and you're entitled to your opinion although a consequence of expressing it is that, sometimes, people may assume you're a bit odd.So because they've been wrong before does it mean they can never be right? We're having that discussion here. Right now. Bruno being careless with the ball isn't something people have dreamt up. It's a fact.
The only point of contention is can we get to a higher level with him and/or if whatever else people think he offers is worth it/can't be offered by a player that is more press resistant and more cultured on the ball.
That's exactly what he does. Some of the passes he attempts can only be described as "Inshallah".
I mean, these are quotes from the guy:
"I will lose a lot of balls, I will miss a lot of passes but I know when I find my strikers and wingers, they will score."
"Sometimes I know the pass is difficult or the chance to get in is not quite there, but I want to respect the movement of my strikers"
as I said - spray and pray
This is the worst take I have ever heard.
Lets compare a CB v CAM passing success
No worse than comparing McTominay and Bruno considering their wildly different roles.
Martinez makes more forward passes in a game than McTominay in a season.
Really, hasn't Bruno played a deeper role last few games?
Do you expect a CAM to have 90% pass accuracy then?
Really, hasn't Bruno played a deeper role last few games?
Do you expect a CAM to have 90% pass accuracy then?
I dont have a problem with Bruno spraying half his passes out to row z when he does it in the opponents third. Same as I dont mind wingers getting tackled trying to carry the ball and take players on.
The problem is when we play good teams, we defend as a unit, Bruno often ends up on the edge of our box and he is a disaster there with the ball under pressure.
Many years ago Lawler was a decent enough head scout. However he and the guy who came with van Gaal has been responsible for some terrible transfers. The fact Bruno has been our best outfield player post Fergie and they recommended against is all you need to know tbh.
Football's a subjective game and you're entitled to your opinion although a consequence of expressing it is that, sometimes, people may assume you're a bit odd.
That’s because we don’t have anyone else. If we had Jude Bellingham would we miss him?
I have Martinez, Casemiro, Varane as players this team misses/would miss more - and there's Rashford too
Yes because they are totally different players. Someone like James Maddison is more like for like. And he’s not as good as Bruno but would be a very good rotation option.
What you are describing is high risk/high reward not spray and pray as you put it. Like I say, these are subjective opinions. There's probably a large number of people who think that the opinions expressed in this thread are ridiculous. I am one of them.That's all good and all, but my reply to you was more about addressing the shameless attempt at dismissing the salient points the scouts raised - points that are leading the discussion in this thread right now - because they had been wrong previously. Again, people aren't just sitting at home dreaming up these scenarios of Bruno Fernandes giving the ball away cheaply or having questionable decision-making.
I know where I stand on the can we become a better team/reach a higher level with a player that's more press resistant and not as reckless on the ball conversation. In regards to best outfield player - I find Martinez and Casemiro to be our most transformative outfield players post Ferguson, although I'll concede they've not been here nowhere near as long.
Hopefully, he can become better on the aspects of his game that contribute to United being under pressure in games, albeit I'm not sure how likely that is since he'll be 29 at the start of the next season. Some players are late bloomers/get better with time though.
True, but can't be that odd since it's a view shared by many - this thread is evidence - and apparently by Bruno Fernandes himself:
"I will lose a lot of balls, I will miss a lot of passes but I know when I find my strikers and wingers, they will score."
"Sometimes I know the pass is difficult or the chance to get in is not quite there, but I want to respect the movement of my strikers"
When they realise Kev de ball to Haaland has a lower pass completion rate than pass and spray Fernandes.
I dont have a problem with Bruno spraying half his passes out to row z when he does it in the opponents third. Same as I dont mind wingers getting tackled trying to carry the ball and take players on.
The problem is when we play good teams, we defend as a unit, Bruno often ends up on the edge of our box and he is a disaster there with the ball under pressure.
I'd disagree with this. If ETH tell him to stop the risky passes and play safer he gotta do that. The guy said himself you do what ETH wants or you're out. Imo it's a bit naive to think Bruno is bigger than ETH or he doesn't listen to what ETH says. It's the total opposite I reckon.All the more reasons to try to be a little more conservative no ? I don't think hoping for him to be less wasteful is an obtainable wish. There is a middle ground that can be found between keeping the ball and creating.
If ETH tell him to stop the risky passes and play safer he gotta do that. The guy said himself you do what ETH wants or you're out. Imo it's a bit naive to think Bruno is bigger than ETH or he doesn't listen to what ETH says. It's the total opposite I reckon.
Imo that simply means he's been doing exactly or at least pretty much what ETH has been asking him to. Else he'd be dropped already. It's ETH we're talking about here not Ole.I thought that too but then Ten Hag never dropped him, it's not possible that he played exactly how he wanted him for 40 or whatever games in a row, because Ten Hag never dropped him even for at least one game(which he could say it was just to rest him if he wanted excuse).
We will have to agree to (strongly) disagree on that.
I'd like you to tell me any aspect of the games of Antony or Sancho, that is better than Willian's. The only 'thing' they have in their favour is age.
Bruno's numbers with Haaland in the team would destroy KDB's. Not because Bruno is a better player but he just goes for it more than KDB for better or worse
I get that some people don't like the role he plays and he gets a lot of criticism but he's right up there with Rashford, Casemiro, Martinez and Varane as one of our best performers this season for me. 10 goals, 10 assists, some insane performances in terms of workrate (Liverpool at home for instance). He's having a very good season.
What you are describing is high risk/high reward not spray and pray as you put it. Like I say, these are subjective opinions. There's probably a large number of people who think that the opinions expressed in this thread are ridiculous. I am one of them.
And how do you expect those stats to look for other players exactly? Here's a per90 from league for this season.Ignore the caption just look at the stats.
I get it even less now.Yes which is as dumb as saying if he wasn’t here we would miss him.
No shite… if he’s the only attacking midfielder we have.
So, stopping those routs is the point, but actually checking exactly how those routs happened in the first place obviously isn't?I'm sure I could find quite a few goals in all the recent routs that were directly following Bruno giving it away cheaply but that obviously isn't the point.
You sure imply a lot of things, while the only "proof" you provide is abstraction and hyperbole.If we want to stop getting regularly humiliated by City and Pool, and Brighton and others, part of the problem is our woeful ball retention and press resistance, and we know who the worst offender there is.
But it's literally just an opinion of an anonymous scout without any provided justification that was not even based on his United career. If you ignore the fact that it was said by an authority it would be completely irrelevant and when authority is a key aspect of this, of course people willl mention their abysmal track record.That's all good and all, but my reply to you was more about addressing the shameless attempt at dismissing the salient points the scouts raised - points that are leading the discussion in this thread right now - because they had been wrong previously.
I get it even less now.
He's not the only attacking midfielder we have. There's a reason why he's been covering for every position in front five at some point of this season, while Ten Hag has been more okay with putting other players at the attacking midfielderish positions.
No, its your posts which work in absolutes. When you're presented with Bruno's statistcis you respond with - are you seriously talking about Bruno and KDB in the same sentence!? - stuff.
Also, you should just admit being a City fan. There's no shame in that.
Right now, yes. Plus Eriksen before the injury. Although the distinction between number 10, most advanced central midfield, second striker or advanced midfielder is mostly meaningless in this context.So these number 10s? Are you talking about Sancho and Weghorst?
Right now, yes. Plus Eriksen before the injury. Although the distinction between number 10, most advanced central midfield, second striker or advanced midfielder is mostly meaningless in this context.