izec
Full Member
He's coming back from an injury and isn't fully fit. Not that it will stop the reactionary and uninformative drivel of some.
does it hurt?
He's coming back from an injury and isn't fully fit. Not that it will stop the reactionary and uninformative drivel of some.
Has not shown anything that suggests he is better than Lingard or Young. I'd fancy Valenica at wide right more than the Embolo we have seen today.
Probably a lot of us are judging as the ones who looked better have been snapped up by German clubs and the options for signing players are sliding down the ability scales gradually. I would have liked a Sanches or Dembele, but we apparently didn't want them, so we are going after someone who Leipzig were desperate to sign, not PSG, or Barcelona etc. Leipzig. He will probably turn out a world beater mind.Ok so from barely half an hour of play you've determined that he isn't better than those two mentioned.
Do you realise how utterly stupid that sounds?
does it hurt?
It wasn't just more game time that did this though, Mahrez improved dramatically this season compared to the tail end of last season (where he played an important part in Leicester's relegation survival). That's also down to the Manager and his coaching staff and the tactics he employs.
I agree that playing at a big club and not getting game time won't do a player any good, but that's where I keep reiterating the importance of what happens in the background. If you do what the coaches tell you in training drills and impress them, you are not going to be warming the bench for a very long time. It's the competitive drive in big clubs that proves this time and again. Rafael at United displaced Neville as first choice because of how he performed in the opportunities he got and in training. Chicarito (Whilst still not young, was shifting from a mediocre league to a big one) displaced United's most expensive striker in Berbatov. There are plenty of examples where you see this sort of thing at big clubs because of how they perform in opportunities they are given. So if Embolo, does the same, there's nothing stopping him from having just as much game time as anyone else.
I'm sure Mourinho knows the importance of instant results, he's on a 3 year (plus one optional) contract after all. His buys are always a mix of youth and experience from what I've noticed, so I am sure he will have a very solid game plan. I'm not overly worried. If he thinks Embolo alone on the right is enough, then I am still not worried.
But yeah, you are right. We can discuss all we want, but in about a year's time, we'll get to know how he does, be it at United, or some other club (I'm assuming the deal to Lepizig is off after the newspaper article).
I agree with this sentiment.. Some people are so quick to write off Schweinstiger, Darmianand, Schneiderlin Depay because they weren't as good as Martial this season.. I think the 2nd season is a better judgement of where players are. It's not just new signings, look at how people have written off James Wilson because of Rashford's riseIt annoys me. It's not just this thread. People who've seen feck all of him acting like experts. Andre Gomes is suddenly the best thing since sliced bread, despite doing feck all all season. Pogba and Griezmann are shite, because yesterday. Our own players aren't really given a chance either. Everyone needs to be as good as van Persie in their first season. I'm better now.
He's coming back from an injury and isn't fully fit. Not that it will stop the reactionary and uninformative drivel of some.
If he is brought in, it's definitely for the RW and not as a striker. The sky reports saying we didn't bid on Vardy and only focussed on Ibra sort of indicates that we are planning Ibra, Rashford and possibly Martial as our 3 strikers for next season. So I'm not going to assume he will displace anyone in the striker's position. If we don't sign any other winger, then his competition will be Young, Januzaj (Reportedly to be loaned out though), Memphis (Reported to be sold), Valencia (Possible if TFM plays at RB), Pereira (No Idea honestly) and Lingard. If that's the case, I think he will get plenty of game time. If we bring in another winger of already undoubted potential, then he's likely to get a lot of minutes from the bench, again not necessarily a bad thing. Many of the class of 92' apparently started in that manner; Neville, Butt, Scholes were all eased into the Starting XI by Fergie and they did alright.I agree that coaching and training matters. How can it not. But following instructions in training doesn't necessarily lead to getting starts because you're relying on players above you in the pecking order to let up which doesn't always happen. Youre not only assuming that Embolo will displace Ibra, you're assuming he will displace one of Martial or Rashford or a new RW.
In case of Rafa and Chicharito it's obvious that both the players they replaced were over 30 and both Rafa and Chico offered something we didn't have at that moment of time i.e. An attacking right full back and a striker that plays on the shoulder of the last defender. If we had those in abundance maybe they wouldn't have got that chance. IMO the Embolo transfer wouldn't happen because we have Rashford Martial and Wilson. How many young strikers can a club need in their first team. it could lead to a Lukaku sort of situation at Chelsea under Mourinho where he had to leave to get more starts. He wasn't just happy proving himself in training and getting substitute appearances.
To me it doesn't sound like sensible business given the gaps we have in other positions and for him it doesn't sound like a good move because he has a lot of competition for the same position. But like you said, we will know In a year. I've been wrong before.
You can't?People judging a player based on a 30 minutes cameo.
His trophies for club and countries, his stats, and he's a regular for one of the biggest team in the world might have something to do with that.Glad that people who weren't impressed by his game didn't watch Muller's 30 min cameo against Atleti in the CL semifinal. They probably would have said No Muller either after that.
Has not shown anything that suggests he is better than Lingard or Young. I'd fancy Valenica at wide right more than the Embolo we have seen today.
Yeah, but if you ask most Bayern fans, they'll say that he's pretty useless coming off from the bench.His trophies for club and countries, his stats, and he's a regular for one of the biggest team in the world might have something to do with that.
People are not judging him only based on 30 minutes.
His youtubes show that he is average. And now these 30 min also validate this opinion
No problem with the running commentary. It's perfectly fair if people have different views on a player as we've seen the last two days with regards to him, Pogba and Griezemann etc. It's the extrapolation that I don't get. Watching him for 30 mins live for the first time and saying he's no better than X Player or Y Player who they've seen plenty of. Unless they were made in jest (Perfectly possible, I can never understand sarcasm on the internet anyway), they just seem like a silly thing to say.Why are people so offended that others have now got an opinion of a player they've been waiting to see? it's not like they're stating they will never change their mind and Embolo is written off, just put what they thought they saw, its a running commentary and will change when he plays well or bad. He seemed to have a spark, I liked him.
Ohhhh so it's the utterly pointless YouTube clips along with the 30 minutes today.
Fair dues. Completely justified opinion then
Welll most of the people here just saw one good game from depay other than youtube clips and say he have potential.No problem with the running commentary. It's perfectly fair if people have different views on a player as we've seen the last two days with regards to him, Pogba and Griezemann etc. It's the extrapolation that I don't get. Watching him for 30 mins live for the first time and saying he's no better than X Player or Y Player who they've seen plenty of. Unless they were made in jest (Perfectly possible, I can never understand sarcasm on the internet anyway), they just seem like a silly thing to say.
THat's a weird example, using Muller though.Yeah, but if you ask most Bayern fans, they'll say that he's pretty useless coming off from the bench.
That's fine I guess.Welll most of the people here just saw one good game from depay other than youtube clips and say he have potential.
He was the most recent high profile player I could think of.THat's a weird example, using Muller though.
People usually judge unknown player, based on his record/stats, the team and league he's played for, age, and watching him. Maybe shocking news for few here, but Youtube videos 5 min. here and there are also useful to show what a player capable of. As well as a 30 min. cameo.
So what if we judge player quickly? the way few react, seems like it is a sin and an absolute wrong way. What's their qualification on insisting that view?
The biggest newspaper in Switzerland said he his coming here. Also the local Leipzig newspaper confirmed it and that he had rejected RB Leipzig. They would have some info since his move that team looked certain.I've watched the match at RSI (TV Swiss in italian) and the pundits continuously said that Embolo was to joined United.
I've seen him last year playing against Fiorentina in Europa League and boy oh boy, he was impressive. I remember it quite well because I thought "that's a player who could to good things for us". Less impressive today but the pundits stressed out that he was coming from an injury.