Brophs
The One and Only
Staggered to learn that the people writing the cheques aren’t happy with this aimless trolley dash.
What makes you think they are "on his side"?
It says something to that effect in here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c4gz5jg81d0oWell, one is his business partner and mentor, the other I forgot.
That’s what I read on reddit at least.
Multiple figures in the senior hierarchy now recognise there is a rift between two main blocs - Clearlake and the group allied to Boehly, including billionaire partners Hansjorg Wyss and Mark Walter, which owns the other 38.5% of the club.
Apologies to all snakes
yeah, some people have wild opinionsYes all the best money laundering rackets tend to be enormously public businesses where very little actual cash is changing hands
Chelsea liquidated, City exonerated, Everton docked 12 points. Handshakes all round at PL HQ.only one solution, liquidate them ...
Most people don't understand what money laundering is and just use it as a blanket phrase for anything dodgy.yeah, some people have wild opinions
Most people don't understand what money laundering is and just use it as a blanket phrase for anything dodgy.
Yeah, agreed. I mean to go this public with a huge money laundering scheme would sure be something I’m sure not even Boehly would be stupid enough to do! But I do guess that we live in a world where it’s not exactly impossible eitherMost people don't understand what money laundering is and just use it as a blanket phrase for anything dodgy.
At some point, their transfer strategy will simply rub off. The gentlemen are simply confused.I can't keep up.
I'm seeing reports that both Clearlake AND Todd want to increase their ownership but I'm now being shown gloating "I told you they'd want to leave" Tweets? Make your mind up!
Read this
nah just liquidate anyone once owned by an Oligarch or are state owned, maybe chuck a few hedge funds in there too, then don't let state ownership back inChelsea liquidated, City exonerated, Everton docked 12 points. Handshakes all round at PL HQ.
He'd have most if not every top club in Europe after him, good luck.We should keep tabs on Palmer. IF they do go into administration then there’s a deal to be done.
True but he’s from Manchester and a United fan so hopefully that would give us a little advantageHe'd have most if not every top club in Europe after him, good luck.
Didn't he turn you down to join the City academy in the first place? And his initial plan was to go on loan and return to City (had he had a season like last on loan he'd have been starting for Pep this year pretty much immediately) which in itself would have ruled out ever playing for United.True but he’s from Manchester and a United fan so hopefully that would give us a little advantage
I think in a year or 2 we are gonna be in a better place than Chelsea. Bruno will be phasing out so there’s a position there for himDidn't he turn you down to join the City academy in the first place? And his initial plan was to go on loan and return to City (had he had a season like last on loan he'd have been starting for Pep this year pretty much immediately) which in itself would have ruled out ever playing for United.
He's pretty ruthless when it comes to what's best for his career, childhood fan or not the only way you'd have a shot is if you're matching his ambitions and needs at that particular stage of his career (and his obvious next step will be at a team challenging at the top).
Even if that was true there's still a world away from being better than Chelsea and being a better proposition than City/Madrid.I think in a year or 2 we are gonna be in a better place than Chelsea. Bruno will be phasing out so there’s a position there for him
I think Chelsea are a bit of a shambles behind the scenesEven if that was true there's still a world away from being better than Chelsea and being a better proposition than City/Madrid.
What an absolute shitshow. They'd be able to sell, but most likely at a loss on their initial investment. Not that they give a shit. They got their management fees. Its not their money anyways.
Be interesting to see which middle eastern individual/company buys them.
From someone who has lived and worked in America for 20 odd years, I can confirm this to be true.No offence to any Americans here, but you guys are kings of the toxic company. Every company owned by Americans seems to be toxic and they don’t see the pattern. You guys are good at making money but you’ll do it in the most painful way possible.
Read this
Works for menah just liquidate anyone once owned by an Oligarch or are state owned, maybe chuck a few hedge funds in there too, then don't let state ownership back in
Russians taking over anything is currently very frowned upon, you know.Is Roman still under sanctions? Time for big comeback?
Yeah, i know. But, from Chelsea's fans perspective, it must hurt a lot.Russians taking over anything is currently very frowned upon, you know.
Yeah, i know. But, from Chelsea's fans perspective, it must hurt a lot.
From excellent owner to clowns. I always had great opinion about Roman (as a owner of course). That club was well run.
: popcorn gif:
(I know I shouldn't get my hopes up.)
Isn’t that what the rest of the Bundesliga is for?If Chelsea goes tits up, where are you guys going to get your young players from?
You need to think about these things.
There's nothing wrong owing your owner money if he's happy to have it in the club. Brighton owe the Chairman, Tony Bloom, just short of 400 million quid. It's all in the form of interest free loans and there is no time limit on paying the money back. I don't know how Abramovich's loans to Chelsea worked, but debt to the owner is not a sign of being badly run. Debts owed outside the club are another story entirely.Chelsea only owed him £1,5billion when he was forced out, well run indeed