beacon
All Creatures Great and Small
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 2,382
Naive of you if you don't mind me saying. I have personally known plenty of people who do not want to work and know all the right things to say to the DHSS to get as much benefit as possible. They exchange ideas with each other on how to scam it. There is no doubt that there is a significant number of people who actively shun work.
Naive of you if you don't mind me saying. I have personally known plenty of people who do not want to work and know all the right things to say to the DHSS to get as much benefit as possible. They exchange ideas with each other on how to scam it. There is no doubt that there is a significant number of people who actively shun work.
Call me elitist
Just makes my belief stronger that there is an upper class, a middle, a working, and a social underclass. This is an example of where it is at its worst.
The fact he's chronically unemployed, lacking aspiration and is clearly a complete low-life is secondary, but exists nonetheless.
But obviously the left will tell you this is just a coincidence.
I believe in this social underclass where you can go down a street and find 90% of the residents not working, and where a similar percentage have criminal records.
A WUM surely?
Why is Alistair being a cnut? Does he think higher class people have never murdered before? Do one will you Alistair ffs.
I hope they string up Hazell by the throat.
Did he confess?
Not at all. Look at the kidnapping of Shannon Matthews. It's becoming more and more of a problem.
Do you, hand on heart, think that this is a crime that could have taken place in any household of any social class?
Why is Alistair being a cnut? Does he think higher class people have never murdered before? Do one will you Alistair ffs.
I hope they string up Hazell by the throat.
Well done, you didn't read any of my posts. I mean, posts like that just make you look like a complete idiot who can't read.
I just hate the way you talk about this 'class' of people. It's so fecking ignorant. The root cause of these complete low lifes are conditions and environmental factors outside their control, so to speak of them in such hateful and judgemental tones is disgusting. I'm not excusing what this particular person did, but the way you talk is just outrageous.
I don't know what area you were fortunate enough to grow up in Alistair but if the people on your hypothetical street where 90% don't work and have criminal records were to have the same opportunities, then you can be sure they would have turned out different.
You are right there is a problem, but you are attributing it to the wrong people and the way you're talking about a whole group of people, it's just crazily stupid and offensive.
Just like most of those "lower classes".
This is exactly what I said to my husband, last night. I didn't put it as well as you though, Alastair.
Erica said:I think I said , it's always these type of people.
My argument was that this particular type of murder was indicative of the way in which this group of people behave.
You must have put it exceedingly badly and stupidly then. Perhaps some sort of irrelevant, ill-thought-out assertion of class superiority?
Ah yes, there we go.
No, a rare and disturbing case of child murder is not indicative of anything. If you want to discuss the prevalence of crime amongst different social groups then you need actual statistics and analysis, not reactionary rhetoric.
What is it that you don't understand? I've never been talking about the amount of murders, just the way in which they're committed.
You must have put it exceedingly badly and stupidly then. Perhaps some sort of irrelevant, ill-thought-out assertion of class superiority?
Ah yes, there we go.
Or is it just because I dared say " these type of people "?
I understand the point you are trying to make. You are attempting to draw a general causal link between unemployment/ concentrated areas of social problems and the conditions that led to this murder. What you fail to grasp is that you are taking a very specific case and reaching very broad conclusions.
This kind of thing tends to happen after high-profile crimes, whereby people try to draw wide-ranging conclusions from staggeringly rare cases. A similar thing happened after the London riots last summer, with the political left and right both seeking to weave the story into their chosen narrative. I was as guilty of this as anyone, trying to prematurely paint the riots as a symptom of social inequality and lack of opportunity.
That is true. This article seems to put doubts over part of Hazell's version of events: http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk...oubts-murder/story-16689391-detail/story.html
And it implicates the grandmother and uncle.
Two more people have been arrested by police investigating the disappearance of Tia Sharp.
Tia, 12, was reported missing on 3 August, sparking a huge search effort in Croydon, south London.
A body was discovered at Tia's grandmother's house in New Addington on Friday.
The partner of Tia Sharp's grandmother, 37-year-old Stuart Hazell, is also being questioned on suspicion of murder.
Police revealed a 39-year-old man and a woman aged 46 were also arrested on Friday.
They are being questioned at a south London police station.
The body found at Christine Sharp's home is yet to be identified. It was reportedly removed from the house on Friday evening.
A post-mortem examination is expected in the next few days.
I understand the point you are trying to make. You are attempting to draw a general causal link between unemployment/ concentrated areas of social problems and the conditions that led to this murder. What you fail to grasp is that you are taking a very specific case and reaching very broad conclusions.
This kind of thing tends to happen after high-profile crimes, whereby people try to draw wide-ranging conclusions from staggeringly rare cases. A similar thing happened after the London riots last summer, with the political left and right both seeking to weave the story into their chosen narrative. I was as guilty of this as anyone, trying to prematurely paint the riots as a symptom of social inequality and lack of opportunity.
You can dare to say it, but its just massively stupid.
It's a fair post. I may be premature on this one. I don't think I am, but I see your point.
Not stupid, a little rash perhaps, but then I've never cared what people like would think. Put yourself in the shoes of someone who's middle class for a change. All my family and friends would agree with Alastair. Even my son, who has turned into such a leftie my dad threatens to disinherit him , can see the distinctions. He tries hard to pretend he's not elitist, but he is, when pushed.
Not stupid, a little rash perhaps, but then I've never cared what people like would think. Put yourself in the shoes of someone who's middle class for a change. All my family and friends would agree with Alastair. Even my son, who has turned into such a leftie my dad threatens to disinherit him , can see the distinctions. He tries hard to pretend he's not elitist, but he is, when pushed.
Wow. Nice little insight there.
Yeah Hectic, you lower class twonk, put yourself in the shoes of someone who thinks they belong to a higher class.
Wow. Nice little insight there. Also "put myself in the shoes of someone who's middle class for a change". That's odd.
What if I were middle class then Erica, and still thought you're both a bit deluded?