So you think what they said about Rooney is too?I think its all true.
So you think what they said about Rooney is too?I think its all true.
Maybe it's a bit like the press. If you keep posting rumours you will eventually hit the nail on the head?So you think what they said about Rooney is too?
Exactly! I can't see it myself but all the bloody women in my office go nuts for Jose Even the conservative gals
So you think what they said about Rooney is too?
He definitely has something. The George Clooney of football.My mum's the same, and she's only seen him on Gogglebox. "He's like Gene Pitney," she warbles. Something's gotten hold of her heart.
He definitely has something. The George Clooney of football.
These tweets makes Fergie look like Frank Underwood
fIf any of that is remotely close to being true then the likes of SBC and SAF aren't doing the club any favors, they both ned to put their egos aside and let the club move forward rather than hanging around trying to influence things to suite them.
I guess the C is silent.
I think its all true. And none of these claims are rocket science either. However rather than it being about power politics, I think that both SAF and Woodward all have the clubs best interest at heart, they simply have different opinions.
The key thing though that pisses me off is SAF still wanting influence. If he did, he should be transparent and have a proper footballing role at the club. But he does not, he is a marketing tool. And so he is repeating all the same mistakes we made with Busby.
Power is never given nor a right no matter what ones job title might be: Power has to be taken. And Woodward has to take a risk if he wants to assert his power.
That risk must be to immediately sack LVG and in his place hire Mourinho. If Giggs leaves, he leaves.n In doing so, he will also cut SAF and his cronies at the knee's.
Appointing Giggs is a bigger risk to his own political position. If Giggs fails, Woodward gets the sack. If Giggs does well, the credit and power goes to SAF, so Woodward effectively also becomes simply a puppet.
This is a big boys business, and people like Woodward are handsomely padi to deal with such organisational dynamics and tough choices. And Woodward is failing on that count right now.
If you believe that Red Issue bollocks, the Man Utd hotseat is practically the Iron Throne, ffs.
I don't necessarily believe this, but having two boards with likely two completely different ideas about what is good for the club could lead to problems.If you believe that Red Issue bollocks, the Man Utd hotseat is practically the Iron Throne, ffs.
Things are so flat that I blame our Ironing Board.
I don't necessarily believe this, but having two boards with likely two completely different ideas about what is good for the club could lead to problems.
This"Like that juicy piece of gossip? Sign up now for just 15 pounds to get more"
That is the one thing we know is true. He now has to grow a pair.So we what can we come up with from those RI tweets?
I came up with Woodward is a pussy, despite having the power he doesn't know what to do with it. We don't need RI for that.
So we what can we come up with from those RI tweets?
I came up with Woodward is a pussy, despite having the power he doesn't know what to do with it. We don't need RI for that.
Wish we had Roy of the Rovers, at least we might score a goal or two.Have we turned into Harchester United?
Yes and CO92 brand for managerial position holds no ground among supporters. Just a scan of social media comments shows that very rarely any fan asks for Giggs to replace LvG. Surely club can see that. Any survey anywhere will overwhelmingly be in Mourinho's favour.Except in this case, the one board has no power over the club, and the other group includes the CEO, Commercial Director of the club. There's no clashing between the boards. If we even believe RI's tweets, they clearly say that Fergie and Gill have been left with little or no power.
Even the sir Bobby said comes from one particular interview. For some reason, it is now taken as fact that the sole purpose of the existence of Sir Bobby is to veto the appointment of Mourinho.I don't know where this 'Fergie hates Mourinho' argument/point comes from. Sir Bobby I can understand but I doubt it's case with Fergie. I remember him saying that he sees himself in Mou. There was a series on football's best managers in 2012 and in episode on Mou, Fergie speaks extensively and glowingly about him. He points out how Mourinho improved work ethic of Galacticos at RM. When asked if he sees Mourinho managing United one day, he says, "Jose can manage absolutely anywhere."
I don't know where this 'Fergie hates Mourinho' argument/point comes from. Sir Bobby I can understand but I doubt it's case with Fergie. I remember him saying that he sees himself in Mou. There was a series on football's best managers in 2012 and in episode on Mou, Fergie speaks extensively and glowingly about him. He points out how Mourinho improved work ethic of Galacticos at RM. When asked if he sees Mourinho managing United one day, he says, "Jose can manage absolutely anywhere."
Exactly! I can't see it myself but all the bloody women in my office go nuts for Jose Even the conservative gals
Jose would also attract the stars that Ed seems to covet. Unfortunately, Ryan wouldn't.
I think he actually has very little choice. Mourinho won't start before the summer, Giggs doesn't want to be interim again, and there's no real Dr. Fixit's available to hire as interims either.Not really a fan of Woodward at all, but wonder if he's trying to give Van Gaal a decent exit and is, amazingly, showing some balls by not pulling the trigger?
Expensive display of generosity though.
"Like that juicy piece of gossip? Sign up now for just 15 pounds to get more"