Deleted 20801
Guest
I never understand the caf reaction to Berbatov, it's ridiculous really.
I can't believe there's still talk of selling him in January....
I can't believe there's still talk of selling him in January....
I never understand the caf reaction to Berbatov, it's ridiculous really.
I can't believe there's still talk of selling him in January....
Oh every time he isn't scoring the same thing appears. It's amazing how many people don't notice/ignore his overall play and contribution to our game.I never understand the caf reaction to Berbatov, it's ridiculous really.
I can't believe there's still talk of selling him in January....
I never understand the caf reaction to Berbatov, it's ridiculous really.
I can't believe there's still talk of selling him in January....
Oh every time he isn't scoring the same thing appears. It's amazing how many people don't notice/ignore his overall play and contribution to our game.
Mind you...Rooney's scoring even less, same number of goals as Evra and none from open play....so perhaps we should sell him in January too. Based on their general contribution on the pitch though I'd prefer to keep Berba any day.
Fair enough, I happen to disagree.Give it over. Rooney scored 30+ goals last year, his desire and hunger on the pitch motivates players. Meanwhile Berbatovs been at the club for 2 and a half seasons and he's still not been close to consitient. For a senior player that isn't good enough.
He had his chance last season when Rooney was injured to step up and become the main man. He blew it, that says it all. Doesn't have the attitude to be successful here and i'd rather we sell him and let our youngsters have a shot instead and push the cash into an area of the pitch where we need major investment.
Selling him in January would be a mistake. But then signing him in the first place has been a mistake. Would prefer we cut our losses in the summer and go with Kiko, Welbeck, Chico, Rooney next year.
Then the money we get from him could be pushed into midfield targets.
In fairness RedSky, you compare Berbatov to Wayne when he had his best season ever. When has he showed anywhere near that kind of consistency? Usually Wayne has longer baron runs then Berbatov's at the moment.
Obviously the difference is Wayne would have been much younger at the time, but I'm only responding to the comparison between Rooney's best ever season to Berbatov's second. I think that's a tad harsh.
Plus it is massively overlooked what he offers the team when it's not goals. He does far more then he's given credit for.
I want to look back and see what the general consensus was when Wayne was averaging under 20 in a season, if people weren't worried because of his general contribution to the game or because he would come good.
In fairness RedSky, you compare Berbatov to Wayne when he had his best season ever. When has he showed anywhere near that kind of consistency? Usually Wayne has longer baron runs then Berbatov's at the moment.
Obviously the difference is Wayne would have been much younger at the time, but I'm only responding to the comparison between Rooney's best ever season to Berbatov's second. I think that's a tad harsh.
Plus it is massively overlooked what he offers the team when it's not goals. He does far more then he's given credit for.
I want to look back and see what the general consensus was when Wayne was averaging under 20 in a season, if people weren't worried because of his general contribution to the game or because he would come good.
I never understand the caf reaction to Berbatov, it's ridiculous really.
I can't believe there's still talk of selling him in January....
Not denying he has a better goalscoring record, and probably will outscore Berbatov every time given the two stay at the same club for more years. The point I was addressing was that Rooney's 30+ season wasn't really a comparitve point in terms of consistency, considering he's not consistent at that level. In terms of his career, it was a freak season.
I don't think Berbatov is consistent enough, but then again I don't think he's had enough time. I reckon I'm more patient with players then the majority of posters on redcafe, often that's to my detriment as players go on to prove me wrong and show that time isn't always the most important factor. Berbatov's a hard one given his age, we obviously didn't buy him in mind to mature and grow into his role, however, I believe that's what he needs, and given time, he will perfect his position in our team and offer us more then our current alternatives.
The same with Nani, Obertan, Bebe, Anderson, Valencia, Macheda etc. These players are judged far too young, with people quick to say they aren't going to make it, or what they've shown so far is an indication of a lack of United quality to them. I think players need two or three years to adjust to where our current players are. Even if you have the ability straight away, you need the mentality, which at United is different to other clubs. Of course the age factor is completely different here, but I think a lot of it still applies to Berbatov who has had years in the premiership, but not at the highest level, and I still don't think we've seen anywhere near the real Berbatov, just glimpses and patches.
I reckon he will be here for at least a couple more years.
Yup. I'm not even saying he's been quality. But he always has his terrific natural ability on the ball to fall back on if it's not perfectly clicking in the final third. He always will hold the ball well in tight spaces and give us a certain class on the ball. It's just really unfair to compare him in the last 8 games to Rooney. Huge gulf between the two.True, in some games Berbs might have not scored but he was involved in build up or holding the ball. For intance the Valencia away game- he didn't score but he worked his bollocks off and was argualby our best attacking player.
Im not his fan, but imo he was much much poorer in his first season than he he has been recently.
I reckon I'm more patient with players then the majority of posters on redcafe, often that's to my detriment as players go on to prove me wrong and show that time isn't always the most important factor. Berbatov's a hard one given his age, we obviously didn't buy him in mind to mature and grow into his role, however, I believe that's what he needs, and given time, he will perfect his position in our team and offer us more then our current alternatives.
To be fair, when you fork out that sort of money on a player of his age you expect him to perform at the highest level from fairly close to the get go, at most a season. And I'm directing those expectations not at us fans, but at the team management. Because lets face it there is a certain after which a player simply cannot be one of the best, unless he's Zinadine Zidane. So yes, we did buy him, IMO at least, believing given his experience and age, that he would deliver very quickly. And because he didn't, time is running out for that with every year.Doesn't work like that though does it. Just because he's older, it doesn't mean there should be no period of adaption, or that this period is somehow the same length of time for every player over a certain age.
That was perhaps our mistake, thinking he would settle in quicker then he has. It's never as simple as 'because he isn't young, he should be producing week in week out'. By that logic, Wayne should be on something like 60 goals a season.
The issue now is, we know he is capable, he just isn't at the right level yet. Do we consider selling him, for far less then £30 million and recoup some of the investment back, or give it time and lose that money in the long-term but gain someone who might perform up front on a consistent, regular basis and a gifted player for the youngsters to continue to learn from.
Two questions:Also, the step up from a team like Spurs to United is a major one isn't it? Surely that accounts for something over 2 and a half years. It's rare to have a player come in and begin scoring relentlessly within two seasons, not to mention what we've managed to lose in that period of time as well. It's not like we've had a fully stable team either for him in the past either.
Two questions:
Is he likely to explode into this player that we all think he could become for us, given his age and the amount of time he's already had at the club?
If not, and we continue getting what we have seen so far (a mixture of poor, average, and the occasional very good performance) is that enough to warrant keeping him?
To be fair, when you fork out that sort of money on a player of his age you expect him to perform at the highest level from fairly close to the get go, at most a season. And I'm directing those expectations not at us fans, but at the team management. Because lets face it there is a certain after which a player simply cannot be one of the best, unless he's Zinadine Zidane. So yes, we did buy him, IMO at least, believing given his experience and age, that he would deliver very quickly. And because he didn't, time is running out for that with every year.
Having said that, I still wouldn't sell him. We're never going recoup any major chunk of his tranfer fee, and given his mentality and perceived nature, I reckon he'd be happy to play a role at the club for many years as an important member of the squad even not someone whose absolutely first choice. Besides, we seem to be focussing on youth and a player like him can only help in their development.
In theory thats what Berbatov is supposed to offer the team, its why we bought him, the reality is in his 2 and a half seasons the times he has made the difference with a bit of magic in a tight game like that are few and far between.Berba can unlock defences better than most and that game was crying out for him, no-one better at managing to flick a ball over/through 8 defenders.
Doesn't work like that though does it. Just because he's older, it doesn't mean there should be no period of adaption, or that this period is somehow the same length of time for every player over a certain age.
.
Yes it is because:
a) His experience will help in a team whose success will depend on the development of youth.
b) People forget how good a squad player he could be. I reckon he could be a cracking backup as he ages. He could be our Giggs/Scholes 5 years from now
If he is gonna start helping he better stop throwing tantrums at the young players. I remember Hernandez one of his first few games for United hit a cross too far and Berba threw his arms in the air it doesnt help especially with some young players.
Saying all that I agree I want him around I like him as a player, with his experience and as you say its a squad game these days.
2 and a half years?
Agreed, I don't like it when he does it, it's annoying really, but it's not limited to Berbatov. Ronaldo would throw strops, Rooney does it all the time, even Giggs gets angry on occasion, although not as much. It seems to be a sticking point with Berbatov though, as if no-one else on our team has a similar problem.
To be fair, when you fork out that sort of money on a player of his age you expect him to perform at the highest level from fairly close to the get go, at most a season. And I'm directing those expectations not at us fans, but at the team management. Because lets face it there is a certain after which a player simply cannot be one of the best, unless he's Zinadine Zidane. So yes, we did buy him, IMO at least, believing given his experience and age, that he would deliver very quickly. And because he didn't, time is running out for that with every year.
Having said that, I still wouldn't sell him. We're never going recoup any major chunk of his tranfer fee, and given his mentality and perceived nature, I reckon he'd be happy to play a role at the club for many years as an important member of the squad even not someone whose absolutely first choice. Besides, we seem to be focussing on youth and a player like him can only help in their development.
Two questions:
Is he likely to explode into this player that we all think he could become for us, given his age and the amount of time he's already had at the club?
If not, and we continue getting what we have seen so far (a mixture of poor, average, and the occasional very good performance) is that enough to warrant keeping him?
United:
Games Played: 101
Goals: 33
Assists: 17
Shots: 230
Shots on Goal: 90
Shot Accuracy: 39%
Spurs:
Games Played: 96
Goals: 45
Assists: 28
Shots: 257
Shots on Goal: 151
Shot Accuracy: 59%
He played much, much better at Spurs, as the stats proves. So whats going wrong with Berbatov?
Think about it. What reaction would you have to the following situations:
a) A player who, if anything, you are a better performer than whines all game about anything wrong/perceivably that you do, despite playing much worse than you.
or
b) A player who is the benchmark of performance of the team shows his frustration towards you.
In almost any walk in life, the latter would make one more determined and the former would draw either ignorance or ire. It's all about respect.
Having said that, I still wouldn't sell him. We're never going recoup any major chunk of his tranfer fee, and given his mentality and perceived nature, I reckon he'd be happy to play a role at the club for many years as an important member of the squad even not someone whose absolutely first choice. Besides, we seem to be focussing on youth and a player like him can only help in their development.