Mainoldo
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 22,965
60m euros.
That makes it more realistic
60m euros.
So roughly £49 + 10 + 17 = £76 million (give or take) for Vidal. You Sir should be running our transfer dealings, that sounds like a bargain60m euros.
So roughly £49 + 10 + 17 = £76 million (give or take) for Vidal. You Sir should be running our transfer dealings, that sounds like a bargain
You don't think that he is able to get deals in 20 days ?
Vidal alone won't be the difference between 5th and 4th IMO. Especially if his injury issues continue.It will cost us more in the long run if our crappy midfield keep us out of the CL!
What, so we should pay £76 for Vidal?It will cost us more in the long run if our crappy midfield keep us out of the CL!
Not saying anything contrary to that! Just hadn't been able to follow this as I was away for a few days and I was just wondering whether there had been any new tangible elements.If there were real evidence there wouldn't be that much "dead in the water" and "close thread" posts.
What, so we should pay £76 for Vidal?
Yeah, we should round it up to £100 million, just for the hell of it.That seems like a bargain imo.
What, so we should pay £76 for Vidal?
I'd have no issue in giving them Fellaini and Hernandez, however to add £46m on top of that would be insane. At the very most you'd be talking about an additional £15 - 17 million.No. But I would not mind paying a hefty fee that includes Fellaini (who is in reality useless to us) and Hernandez who also is of no real use to us.
Id no no issue in giving them Fellaini and Hernandez, however to add £46m on top of that would be insane. At the very most you'd be talking about an additional £15 - 17 million.
Sometimes it is not really about whether you care about us spending money or not. It's something to set precedent and if we are getting a ridiculously overpriced player now, where will this farce end? In the future, there will be more and more players/agent demanding more and we look desperate. United was never and hopefully never will be, a club buying trophies with obscene kind of ££££s. Our pockets are also hardly bottomlessIts speculation and almost definitely bullshit however I would not have a problem with the deal if he were to return to his best. We have no use for Fellaini, Chicha is better off going to another team so the main loss would be money and I couldnt care less about the Glazers spending cash.
Sorry are we purposely ignoring Juve denying any negotiations for Vidal with United?
I can understand that, but we would still be massively undervaluing Hernandez and Fellaini in that deal. As a Club it frustrates the Hell out of me how we never get a good deal when selling players, a year ago we could have got £20+ million for Hernandez, add that to the £10 million loss on Fellaini then we are still overpaying, we could and should be getting him or alot less.I agree that 46m on top of that would be extermely steep - I'd be happy to give them 30m though. Our midfield is atrocious and everyone knows that and will try to take advantage until we actually do manage to strengthen it.
No to be honest.
Unless he offers what the club wants (obviously not wise entering into a bidding war)I can see no reason why he can't just sign the players we want unless that said player doesn't want to join us.
When he said about the club being willing to spend huge if the manager wants the player and that players are queuing up to sign for us, all makes me a bit skeptical.
Yes Vidal has a knee issue so I understand to a degree why this transfer would potentially take a long time but if we really do want the likes of Blind, Cuardado etc why not just bid. We bid for Vermaelen when linked with him over 6 weeks ago, we must have been so confident of signing him but that back fired with Wengers unreasonable demands. Surely we could have bid weeks back and then left a lot more time to sign another CB should we fail.
Yes people will shoot me down about the complex nature of signing a player but to be honest that doesn't bother me, that is the job of Ed and the clubs lawyers to sort out, that's what they get paid for.
If even the most simplistic of signings are that complex and take a long time why leave it so late in the window.
It would also be of no benefit to selling clubs to lie about us making bids. At present we have made no bids for Cuardado, Di Maria, Blind or Vidal according to those clubs - obviously we may not be after any of them but I highly doubt that.
I know people will pull apart this post and put me in my place but this is my opinion and I hope it proves to be completely wrong come the 1st September.
What, so we should pay £76 for Vidal?
That seems like a bargain imo.
Yeah, we should round it up to £100 million, just for the hell of it.
You round £76 up to £100 million? Your financial affairs must be interesting.
Sarcasm is lost on you isn't it?You round £76 up to £100 million? Your financial affairs must be interesting.
Sarcasm is lost on you isn't it?
No to be honest.
Unless he offers what the club wants (obviously not wise entering into a bidding war)I can see no reason why he can't just sign the players we want unless that said player doesn't want to join us.
When he said about the club being willing to spend huge if the manager wants the player and that players are queuing up to sign for us, all makes me a bit skeptical.
Yes Vidal has a knee issue so I understand to a degree why this transfer would potentially take a long time but if we really do want the likes of Blind, Cuardado etc why not just bid. We bid for Vermaelen when linked with him over 6 weeks ago, we must have been so confident of signing him but that back fired with Wengers unreasonable demands. Surely we could have bid weeks back and then left a lot more time to sign another CB should we fail.
Yes people will shoot me down about the complex nature of signing a player but to be honest that doesn't bother me, that is the job of Ed and the clubs lawyers to sort out, that's what they get paid for.
If even the most simplistic of signings are that complex and take a long time why leave it so late in the window.
It would also be of no benefit to selling clubs to lie about us making bids. At present we have made no bids for Cuardado, Di Maria, Blind or Vidal according to those clubs - obviously we may not be after any of them but I highly doubt that.
I know people will pull apart this post and put me in my place but this is my opinion and I hope it proves to be completely wrong come the 1st September.
Funny.Nope, you've just missed the same joke twice in a row now. You wrote £76, not £76m. That's what wr8 was trying to point out.
Funny.
No to be honest.
Unless he offers what the club wants (obviously not wise entering into a bidding war)I can see no reason why he can't just sign the players we want unless that said player doesn't want to join us.
When he said about the club being willing to spend huge if the manager wants the player and that players are queuing up to sign for us, all makes me a bit skeptical.
Yes Vidal has a knee issue so I understand to a degree why this transfer would potentially take a long time but if we really do want the likes of Blind, Cuardado etc why not just bid. We bid for Vermaelen when linked with him over 6 weeks ago, we must have been so confident of signing him but that back fired with Wengers unreasonable demands. Surely we could have bid weeks back and then left a lot more time to sign another CB should we fail.
Yes people will shoot me down about the complex nature of signing a player but to be honest that doesn't bother me, that is the job of Ed and the clubs lawyers to sort out, that's what they get paid for.
If even the most simplistic of signings are that complex and take a long time why leave it so late in the window.
It would also be of no benefit to selling clubs to lie about us making bids. At present we have made no bids for Cuardado, Di Maria, Blind or Vidal according to those clubs - obviously we may not be after any of them but I highly doubt that.
I know people will pull apart this post and put me in my place but this is my opinion and I hope it proves to be completely wrong come the 1st September.
We aren't negotiating for Vidal. Vidal's agent is. Keep up, we established that weeks ago!Sorry are we purposely ignoring Juve denying any negotiations for Vidal with United?
Stop it, your cracking me up here.Hey, the credit's all wr8's. I'm just the guy who had to explain it to you like I would to a child.
T'is isn't it. And to think we still have 3 weeks of the window leftThis thread is a mess.
The problem is the journalists only know what we know - a few spurious reports coming out of Chile and Juve's insistence that he's staying. Nowhere near enough for them to waste a presser question on.
Plus, even if they did, they know the answer would be that he won't talk about specific players.
All the reliable journos have repeatedly said that the club has told them we aren't interested/negotiating for Vidal. What more do you need?
you're*Stop it, your cracking me up here.
That’s been evident by the repeated rumours that have been floating about for months, if he is going to sign it’s going to come out of the blue (so to speak)As far as I'm concerned there are no reliable journos connected with United this year. They're all feeding of scraps
All the reliable journos have repeatedly said that the club has told them we aren't interested/negotiating for Vidal. What more do you need?