ivaldo
Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,725
Fair play.Yep SolidShite from now on apparently I hate to say it, I kind of like it. Suits me better posting under that name.
Fair play.Yep SolidShite from now on apparently I hate to say it, I kind of like it. Suits me better posting under that name.
That side again was:
De Gea-Rafael-Shaw-Hummels-Evans-Vidal-Herrera-Di Maria-Mata-Januzaj-Van Persie.
To me that doesn't look better than:
Neuer-Lahm-Alaba-Dante-Boateng-Schweinsteiger-Kroos-Gotze-Robben-Ribery-Muller
nor:
Diego Lopez-Carvajal-Coentrao-Pepe-Ramos-Alonso-Modric-Ronaldo-Bale-Rodriguez-Benzema
nor:
Bravo-Alves-Pique-Mascherano-Alba-Busquets-Xavi-Iniesta-Pedro-Neymar-Messi
To press at the very highest level you need another midfielder who is either very mobile or comfortable pressing as well, wirh Herrera and Vidal you have two players with incredibly high work rate and who (especially Herrera) are intelligent footballers. They are clever enough to know that if the other guy is bombing forward then they need to sit, its Sunday League stuff.I don't think there will be too much of an issue with Vidal's defensive work, even if he went for £100m. And that really wasn't what I was saying - by highlighting his fee I was really just trying to illustrate how he's the best midfielder in the world, and how he would cost a huge amount. The combination of those two things makes it extremely important we get the best out of him.. Why sign him otherwise.
The comment about letting Vidal do his thing includes his defensive work, his best asset in defence is his pressing which really is relentless. Trouble is when you press as high as he does without a holder you run the risk of getting caught out. So I really wasn't suggesting that he shirks any defensive duty.
I also wasn't suggesting that he sticks to one part of the pitch - in fact the whole reason I would prefer Vidal to be combined with a holder like Carvalho is precisely to allow him to go wherever he wanted without any restrictions. He wouldn't need to 'hold' or cover, so he can do what he wants. He's the best midfielder on the pitch and having someone sit back allows him to go and express himself.
What does it say? Can't see at work.
What does it say? Can't see at work.
The major Italian sport newspaper Gazzetta dello Sport have been publishing stories for over a week alluding to Juventus softening on the idea of a Arturo Vidal sale. Turin newspaper Tuttosport have not been so convinced that a transfer is possible, which should be no surprise. Tuttosport concentrate mainly on Juventus and are of course biased in their reporting a lot of the time, the idea that their local team could lose arguably its best player was not one they wanted to take seriously.
Things are changing and even Tuttosport now accept that a move could happen. Their piece on the situation starts by explaining that Juventus are erecting a wall around Vidal and Paul Pogba to try and stop anyone buying them. Not a literal wall, well probably not anyway.
However, they end the piece by explaining that a bid totalling €50m would be sufficient for Juventus because it would allow them to strengthen their team and compensate for the lose of the Chilean midfielder. And Tuttosport say that the €50m doesn't have to be all cash, it can be made up of cash and players.
Juventus have long been reportedly interested in Luis Nani but have never been able to do a deal for the Manchester United player. Antonio Conte's dream for this transfer window was Alexis Sanchez and that now looks unlikely, with Arsenal beating them to it. Nani would be an alternative to add attacking threat from wide positions and the Turin newspaper reckon Manchester United will add him into the deal.
If it adds up to €50m then Manchester United have met what Juventus need for Vidal, according to Tuttosport, and a deal can be completed.
Manchester United would probably want to value Nani at more than Juventus but a figure of around €15m/£12m would seen to be reasonable for the 27 year old Portuguese international. That would bring the cash difference down to €35m which sounds perfectly manageable for the Premier League club. A deal of £28m plus Nani sounds like something of a steal given the winger's past season(s). There is no doubt that Nani is very talented and a move may be the best thing for him.
Swap deals and using players as part payment is more common in Italian football but it's always difficult to pull these things off, getting agreement from all agents and players involved can be tricky to do at the same time. It could be that one deal is done before the other, should Tuttosport's theory turn out to be reality.
Anyone know much about Tuttosport? As the local Juve friendly paper, are they likely to sensationalise any story to sell papers, even if the story is about a Juve star leaving?
To press at the very highest level you need another midfielder who is either very mobile or comfortable pressing as well, wirh Herrera and Vidal you have two players with incredibly high work rate and who (especially Herrera) are intelligent footballers. They are clever enough to know that if the other guy is bombing forward then they need to sit, its Sunday League stuff.
So what if it restricts Vidals game SLIGHTLY, knowing that either one of those midfielders can accelerate quickly and join the attack is a far bigger weapon than Vidal on his own.
Anyone know much about Tuttosport? As the local Juve friendly paper, are they likely to sensationalise any story to sell papers, even if the story is about a Juve star leaving?
I have a long list of players they can have...Young, Nani, Anderson, Fletcher, Hernandez, Bebe, Cleverley, Smalling, Evra, even Carrick. Give them the lot - straight swap for Arturo!Literally couldn't care less if we have to give them players. Get rid of whoever to get Vidal.
To press at the very highest level you need another midfielder who is either very mobile or comfortable pressing as well, wirh Herrera and Vidal you have two players with incredibly high work rate and who (especially Herrera) are intelligent footballers. They are clever enough to know that if the other guy is bombing forward then they need to sit, its Sunday League stuff.
So what if it restricts Vidals game SLIGHTLY, knowing that either one of those midfielders can accelerate quickly and join the attack is a far bigger weapon than Vidal on his own.
They talk less bullshit than gazzetta.Anyone know much about Tuttosport? As the local Juve friendly paper, are they likely to sensationalise any story to sell papers, even if the story is about a Juve star leaving?
Juve have been linked with Nani for some time though anyway right? Regardless of any potential deal with Vidal. If it suits all parties involved, then why not.How
Has Manchester United ever done a high profile swap deal? We don't usually trade with people's lives but hey ho I'm all for it!
I have/had the same worry, but I think that both Herrera and Vidal are versatile enough and intelligent enough to make the partnership work. Something like Khedira-Alonso when neither of them is a defensive midfielder.Again not too sure what the attitude is for. It seems pretty clear to me that if you spend £50m on a player you should try and get the most out of him. Something like Vidal/Carvalho is more balanced than Vidal/Herrera. I don't think that's too controversial really and it's all that has been said. I can't think of many top teams who used a midfield partnership like Vidal/Herrera, but I can think of countless who use a holder.
Lots of teams have pressed whilst having a holding midfielder - really not sure what you're on about there. In terms of pressing Barcelona managed it fine with Busquets, Spain actually managed it with two holders as they also used Alonso. It's really common.
If you've read my posts you'll see that I'm all for this transfer, but that midfield partnership is unbalanced whichever way you look at it and I don't think you'll get the most from Vidal.
I have/had the same worry, but I think that both Herrera and Vidal are versatile enough and intelligent enough to make the partnership work. Something like Khedira-Alonso when neither of them is a defensive midfielder.
Thing is that Alonso sits a lot more than either of those, he pretty much is a holder who dictates things from deep. It certainly doesn't match the 'take turns to bomb forward' narrative that we have going on here for this partnership.
Maybe Herrera could adapt his game to sit and pass from deep though.
Yep SolidShite from now on apparently I hate to say it, I kind of like it. Suits me better posting under that name.
I have/had the same worry, but I think that both Herrera and Vidal are versatile enough and intelligent enough to make the partnership work. Something like Khedira-Alonso when neither of them is a defensive midfielder.
Literally couldn't care less if we have to give them players. Get rid of whoever to get Vidal.
Here's Sport Witness' response to the same question someone else asked on twitter:Is there a link to the tuttosport article?
They really, really hate us since our interest in Vidal over at Juventuz fan forums, some of the stuff they're spouting is laughable.
Again not too sure what the attitude is for. It seems pretty clear to me that if you spend £50m on a player you should try and get the most out of him. Something like Vidal/Carvalho is more balanced than Vidal/Herrera. I don't think that's too controversial really and it's all that has been said. I can't think of many top teams who used a midfield partnership like Vidal/Herrera, but I can think of countless who use a holder.
Lots of teams have pressed whilst having a holding midfielder - really not sure what you're on about there. In terms of pressing Barcelona managed it fine with Busquets, Spain actually managed it with two holders as they also used Alonso. It's really common.
If you've read my posts you'll see that I'm all for this transfer, but that midfield partnership is unbalanced whichever way you look at it and I don't think you'll get the most from Vidal. Hopefully if we sign him we'll play a 3-5-2 which suits the rest of our players anyway, but would certainly better fit a Herrera/Vidal midfield IMO. In that system I think it would be perfect.
Here's Sport Witness' response to the same question someone else asked on twitter:
How's your Italian?
Edit - I think this is the online link to the article - http://www.tuttosport.com/calcio/mondiali_2014/girone-b/cile/2014/07/09-300237/Evra-Juve, via libera. Vidal: orbita United
Headline seems to match anyway
Chill man, where the hell is there any attitude in my post whatsoever, just because I disagree with your point doesn't mean I have attitude.Again not too sure what the attitude is for. It seems pretty clear to me that if you spend £50m on a player you should try and get the most out of him. Something like Vidal/Carvalho is more balanced than Vidal/Herrera. I don't think that's too controversial really and it's all that has been said. I can't think of many top teams who used a midfield partnership like Vidal/Herrera, but I can think of countless who use a holder.
Lots of teams have pressed whilst having a holding midfielder - really not sure what you're on about there. In terms of pressing Barcelona managed it fine with Busquets, Spain actually managed it with two holders as they also used Alonso. It's really common.
If you've read my posts you'll see that I'm all for this transfer, but that midfield partnership is unbalanced whichever way you look at it and I don't think you'll get the most from Vidal. Hopefully if we sign him we'll play a 3-5-2 which suits the rest of our players anyway, but would certainly better fit a Herrera/Vidal midfield IMO. In that system I think it would be perfect.
Seems that the Vidal rumours are slowly heating up. Just waiting for that one 100% credible source to announce something.
I'm convinced its going to happen now. The sheer quantity of rumours circulating from diverse sources has got me. Our odds have shortened a fair bit recently as well (8/11) with Madrid 2nd at 14s (Sky Bet). Bookies rarely get it wrong.Seems that the Vidal rumours are slowly heating up. Just waiting for that one 100% credible source to announce something.
Fair enough, I for one take bookies odds with a pinch of salt.I'm convinced its going to happen now. The sheer quantity of rumours circulating from diverse sources has got me. Our odds have shortened a fair bit recently as well (8/11) with Madrid 2nd at 14s (Sky Bet). Bookies rarely get it wrong.
I tend to think you can tell when there is genuine interest, depending on what market you look at.Fair enough, I for one take bookies odds with a pinch of salt.
These rumours are all from Italy and are relayed on twitter by twitter 'itk'
Just want SSN or BBC to break something then I'll get excited.
I kain 100% iPhone battery in like 10 hours on here and SSN app waiting
Same asI tend to think you can tell when there is genuine interest, depending on what market you look at.
I've basically lived in the twitter and Vidal thread these last few days!
If you said to me at the end of of May we'd have Vidal, Herrera and Shaw signed up this summer of have bitten your hand off.I dont like what I'm becoming. I only play the lottery now when its a triple rollover as several million is no longer enough. Vidal alone doesn't fix me unless followed up with Di Maria and Hummels......the shame of it!
THIS... roughly 200 mil to give us possibly the best side in Europe