Bondi77
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
- Messages
- 8,331
Alot of people ignore that part of his performance.
Alot of people ignore that part of his performance.
Honestly, give up on the Giggs comparison. There's the difference in level, but also just a complete difference in style. There's absolutely no similarity.
Antony probably doesn't even have chest hair.Honestly, give up on the Giggs comparison. There's the difference in level, but also just a complete difference in style. There's absolutely no similarity.
Especially when he’s on for 12/13 goals in his debut season as a wide man.Caf writing off young players in their first seasons in a new league after a mere 6 months.
This. I’m afraid if you cost in excess of 80 million the idea is you deliver relatively sharply. I much prefer Antony being in our team than some of the alternatives but touching on about Garnacho. He’s 18, has never even played regularly in the man’s game and yet is outperforming Antony in the metrics you mention.The scary thing about his lack of assists is he's not even creating a lot of chances that are being missed either. He's just not creating anything.
Genuinely think the step up from Dutch league to PL has been hard for him where as Martinez has adapted much better. It can happen.
Garnacho is already the better player for me. Far more direct, beats his man more easily, not afraid to use his weaker foot and also looks more of a threat around the box.
what?
If in doubt, watch the Barcelona game. Antony came on as a sub, opened up the game and scored the winner.
He is confident, brave and unpredictable, often attracting 2+ players/defenders because of it, opening up spaces elsewhere. Also his pass accuracy is over 80% I think.
He used to piss me off but I’m starting to see why EtH likes to use him. Not the perfect player but he’s an extra flow of adrenalin sometimes.
We're having an amazing season, not in a small part down to Antony scoring the winner against Barcelona, less than a week ago. Not to mention goals against Arsenal and City.
Why are you comparing him to Garnacho? He's a totally different player who draws so much attention in tight spaces on the right that it frees up the likes of Garnacho and Rashford on the left. This is exactly how we are set up to play.
Do you watch the games?
This guy gets it.
Stop whinging and looking to 'burst INSERT NAME's bubble'. We're playing brilliantly at the moment, fecking enjoy it.
I think because in general the older posters have a better understanding of football. 90% of posts these days on here especially regarding player performances are absolute drivel and expose the posters lack of understanding.I wonder if there's an age differential in posters views, I get the feeling that older posters are likley to be more patient with players and younger ones less so - of couse I could be barking up the wrong tree
Antony has 6 goals and 1 assist this season. Raphinha has 7 goals and 9 assists this season. He also had 17 goals and 12 assists in 60-something games with Leeds, who were absolutely horrendous, so it's not like he doesn't know the Premier League. And he is starting ahead of Antony in the NT. Just a superior player overall, but for far less money. I didn't rate him that much before, but I started to change my mind after having to watch Antony.
But that ship sailed anyway. Hopefully, Amad comes good next season.
Odd take that, there’s nothing “lucky” about it, he’s one of the reasons the team is much better, he adds great balane, great workrate, appears a true big game player, is another with a great mentality and attitude, and he’s incredibly press resistant. We look a much better side when he starts.
How the hell would you know what people’s perceptions were? Giggs was a considerablyLike I just pointed out. Giggs in his first 4 seasons had a similar goal to game ratio that Antony has in his 6 months. But I understand the passing of time and old age can distort things.
Ryan Giggs didn’t spend every single game cutting inside and shooting. You’re comparing a succulent grape to a raisin. But then you wouldn’t have a fecking clue because you weren’t even alive.He had a similar goals to game ratio as Antony in his first 4 seasons. So either Antony also scores a lot of goals, or people are wrong about the frequency with which Giggs scored (goals)
I sometimes wonder whether people are watching the same player. It is not Antony that provides the balance, it is having a player out wide that provides the balance. It's tactical, not some amazing Antony inspired effect on the team. The team changes when different players play... Varane is different to Martinez, or Shaw when he plays Centre Back.. but they are still all Centre Back for example. The team improves because of their quality in playing that position. This crap about big game player, and where is that being shown then? You telling me the Cup Tie in the week was not a big game? How disrespectful to both clubs and fans!
I think because in general the older posters have a better understanding of football. 90% of posts these days on here especially regarding player performances are absolute drivel and expose the posters lack of understanding.
I've been on the Caf for a long time and lament the drop in quality of posts/posters in more recent years. Nowadays have to wade through 10-20 rubbish posts to come across a decent one in any thread.
At least do your research. He has been clocked at 35.7kph which is anything but slow.
if people can stop refactoring history to turn Giggs into some high scoring proficient winger that would be good. My comparison was in regards to 1) current stats, 2) he keeps defenders occupied.Honestly, give up on the Giggs comparison. There's the difference in level, but also just a complete difference in style. There's absolutely no similarity.
100%If in doubt, watch the Barcelona game. Antony came on as a sub, opened up the game and scored the winner.
He is confident, brave and unpredictable, often attracting 2+ players/defenders because of it, opening up spaces elsewhere. Also his pass accuracy is over 80% I think.
He used to piss me off but I’m starting to see why EtH likes to use him. Not the perfect player but he’s an extra flow of adrenalin sometimes.
Sancho gets so much patience in to end of his 2nd year but Antony gets nothing after 6 months.
Antony has been better than Sancho for me. Sancho cost just as expensive.
He has clear pros to his game and some quite evident cons.
I like his tenacity, the fact that he fears no one, his pressing, his shooting ability/
I've an issue with his dribbling and his chance creation. His decision-making is also very iffy.
Ideally, you'd want an excellent winger who- while scoring every now and again like Antony does, and kudos to him for that-
will mainly create a lot of chances. Sterling at his pomp, Leroy Sane, Giggs obviously are what I have in mind.
Yes, Antony stretches defenses, but the fact that he almost never beats his man makes for a rather mild stretching.
Sanco is also disappointing in this regard.
For me, a winger who creates lots of good chances but struggles to score is a much more valuable asset than a winger who's the opposite.
If someone has both of these feats in his locker (Mbappe, say) then great, but these are hard to find.
I wonder what he'll develop into because at Ajax he seemed to be a very good crosser of the ball.
(and generally, someone who can bend them from outside of the box to the top corner will also be at least a decent crosser).
Firstly he didn’t cost as much, secondly he’s younger than Antony and thirdly he has a better prior record so there’s at least something to pin hope on. Sancho has had plenty of criticism. Truth is neither have been worth the fee so far.Sancho gets so much patience in to end of his 2nd year but Antony gets nothing after 6 months.
Antony has been better than Sancho for me. Sancho cost just as expensive.
Caf writing off young players in their first seasons in a new league after a mere 6 months.
WTF does this even mean, I thought we were discussing a footballer not aisle 3 in Tesco'sWhat people don't get about him is that he's a turnip. We need tomatoes to arrive for the turnip to look good.
So like footballers, they tend to get better with ageI think because in general the older posters have a better understanding of football. 90% of posts these days on here especially regarding player performances are absolute drivel and expose the posters lack of understanding.
I've been on the Caf for a long time and lament the drop in quality of posts/posters in more recent years. Nowadays have to wade through 10-20 rubbish posts to come across a decent one in any thread.
We are more solid defensively with him on the RW. This in itself gives room for players like Shaw/Malacia, Casemiro/Fred/Sabitzer and Wan Bissaka/Dalot to contribute in attack, and for Rashford/Garnacho to cheat a bit in defense to preserve more danger for the counter.
He is also one of the few attacking players we have who is able to retain the ball under pressure and get it out through the middle third fairly consistently. This protects us against being countered or sieged.
I think this is why Ten Hag seems to prefer him whenever he is fit to play.
And that's spot on, players, not just Antony, are judged individually rather than how they work as part of the team, our RB's have improved substantially this season and IMO that is partly due to Antony, he is one of the best ball carriers in the team, if it wasn't for the fact he's so one footed I'd say there was case to be made that he'd be a good option to play the role that we apparently want De Jong to do.I thought ETH made an interesting comment the other day: "the players who make up the best team will play". He seemed to be saying that it's not always the most talented (or even in-form) players that will play, but the ones who can work together best - ie. becoming something more than the sum of their parts. He is seeing the bigger picture (as we would expect him to I guess), whereas some posters seem to be looking at Anthony in isolation.