Antony under investigation by Brazilian authorities for domestic abuse | Inquiries ended | Back in the squad

You can’t lump the Greenwood and Antony cases in together. Greenwood’s case was one of a kind because of the evidence that went public. Evidence neither the club nor the player have been able to explain away ever since. So the club is entitled to respond to the reputational damage that they would incur if Greenwood turned out to play for them every weekend.

Obviously, the Antony situation is different. And I’m sure he’d have been given the same protection that any other of the many other footballers who’ve faced similar accusations over the years. If it wasn’t for the Greenwood case creating a precedent. So it’s all a bit of a mess.

From the official club statement "Based on the evidence available to us, we have concluded that the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged. "
 
That was the point I was trying to make. Our CEO bends to negative media. The media now dictates who we can select/keep in our team.

This was never the case in the past. We've had plenty of negative media and dealt with it swiftly and decisively under SAF.

And yes, I agree there are sociopaths on here. But I will stay away from all the morality discussions and await the final verdict from the courts/law enforcement.

If you are talking about Greenwood, then I'm glad the media brought the club to the right decision.
 
Adds nothing to the discussion
Maybe we can find a Spanish club to loan Antony to. Seems like there’s not much of a problem having very controversial players play for a club there.
 
From the official club statement "Based on the evidence available to us, we have concluded that the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged. "

That’s not explaining away
 
From the official club statement "Based on the evidence available to us, we have concluded that the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged. "

Yeah, we’ve all read the statement. As I said, evidence neither the club nor the player have been able to explain away ever since.
 
Nothing statement but there's also nothing they can say. As I've said before .. Greenwood situation was different due to the audio released. This is about the same as any other case. You can't make a decision based on just allegation, he said she said or whatever. If he gets charged, then he'll be suspended. If not, life goes on.
 
Good statement. The final line was interesting as I don't recall seeing anything similar with Greenwood "...with consideration of the impact of these allegations and subsequent reporting will have on survivors of abuse."
 
There is no right thing here.

And as you have said United completely bungled it, they didn't act out of righteous indignation, because they did a u-turn after they faced the possibility of some uproar. If they had immediately terminated MG after the stuff came out then I would be more understanding of the decision, and applauding their lack of dithering, even if I disagreed with us taking such a loss. There's no right way on this, but there's credit in making a stern decision and standing behind it.

But United don't get any credit for this. They were bullied into a decision here (and the statement is so vacuous there are arguments on what it actually means). I'd use the word spineless but I got quality points for using it earlier :lol:
And not a single comment on Arsenal who have been even more spineless than United. For what it’s worth, United absolutely did the correct thing, and didn’t bungle it, by suspending him with pay while the police were investigating and he was subsequently charged.

Once the charges were dropped, and United didn’t have access to the evidence in those original charges, it became very difficult for United - whatever their decision was, it was handled badly. But that doesn’t override the fact that they did the right thing initially.

There no credit for making the wrong decision and standing by it, like Arsenal have done.
 
Evidence neither the club nor the player have been able to explain away ever since.
From the official club statement "Based on the evidence available to us, we have concluded that the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged. "
I don't understand why people think the club are under any sort of obligation to provide an explanation to us.

You responded to a post saying that the Greenwood evidence was never explained away, with a quote from the club where they explicitly didn’t explain the evidence away. If you’d replied with the second post originally I wouldn’t have quoted you
 
I'm only a white knight relative to the sociopaths in the thread.

:lol:

(Sorry, shouldn't laugh - but it genuinely made me laugh, and there is no emoji for "nodding in approval whilst laughing but also looking somewhat concerned").
 
Were people this concerned during Partey's rapey investigation? Or Arsenal is beyond criticism?
 
Good statement. The final line was interesting as I don't recall seeing anything similar with Greenwood "...with consideration of the impact of these allegations and subsequent reporting will have on survivors of abuse."

Slowly realising.
 
Realistically that’s about as much as the club can say and do at this point
 
Well atleast we’re experts in dealing with this now, I guess.

united really feels on a low right now, I really feel for ETH. It’s just one thing after another.
 
You're oddly insistent that taking a stand is meaningless.

I think considering the huge amounts of domestic and sexual violence, the fear to report and disproportionately small conviction stats any stand is far from meaningless and I know rape victims who agree. They feel isolated and disguarded every day of their lives because as well as the injury, they see no support in the society in which they live.

Yes man I think victims should be supported through tangible means. Such as

Reducing rape kit backlogs
Educating men on sexual assault, consent
Pushing for more cases to be prosecuted regardless of conviction rates

Anything that gets abusers (proven as such through court or through clear and convincing evidence in the public domain) in jail, and tangibly changing nasty behavior, I'm all for it, and all for society (including football clubs) investing resources in doing so.
 
Sadly we have to bow down to the media and public demands because sponsorships are the only way we make money this days. We certainly don't get prize money for winning stuff :lol:

What ever the public wants, the public gets. As long as they just keep buying the merchandise. We can't afford to have a negative public perception.

In any case, if he is charged by the police for a grave crime he must be suspended.
 
Yes man I think victims should be supported through tangible means. Such as

Reducing rape kit backlogs
Educating men on sexual assault, consent
Pushing for more cases to be prosecuted regardless of conviction rates

Anything that gets abusers (proven as such through court or through clear and convincing evidence in the public domain) in jail, and tangibly changing nasty behavior, I'm all for it, and all for society (including football clubs) investing resources in doing so.

This is the main one.
Encouraging young men to be respectful shouldn't be a big thing.