andersj
Nick Powell Expert
And I respect that if your algorithm says that Ajax are the 6th best team in the world, then they are.
Obviously not if you think they are not. Like. Because. Common sense.
And I respect that if your algorithm says that Ajax are the 6th best team in the world, then they are.
Obviously not if you think they are not. Like. Because. Common sense.
The teams they play against get rated too. So a win against a poor team gives you fewer point in the rating.
So it is not the wins against poor teams that puts then so high. It is their results against CL/EL teams for the past few years that put them this high up.
PSG have done better than them in Europe. As have Atletico. Atletico have also managed to win a much better league since Ajax’ remarkable CL semi, and regularly compete. Then there is the common sense evaluation that the likes of Neymar, Mbappé, Di Maria, Icardi, Verratti, Marquinhos and co are significantly better than Tadic, Haller and Berghuis. Although that clearly isn’t a common sense to you because your spreadsheet says otherwise.
They are obviously better players. But they dont work as well together.
Since Tuchel took charge of PSG they have played 39 games in the CL. Translating their results to points, they have 72 points. An average of 1,85 points per game. Slightly better than EtHs average of 1,82 per game. But the trajectory for PSG is down. Pochettino only managed 1,5 points per game with PSG. I think it is a similar case for Atletico the past two seasons.
I also dont think ClubElo (or my simplification of results in CL) is a blueprint for anything. There is less than 1 percent difference between the point score of Ajax (1875) and PSG (1857). What I would argue the model imply, and their results in CL, is that Ajax is a really, really good team. On a similar level to almost any team in Europe. With a few exceptions that has been in a league of their own for a couple of years.
Is Atletico or PSG better? Have they been for the past two years? Maybe! But I dont think there is really much between the sides. Obviously in personnel. But as a team? I dont think so.
You thinking Ajax are better ‘as a team’ than PSG and Atletico is subjective. There is no algorithm for deciding the best unit. Teams have different styles. Atletico are a fantastic ‘team’, for example. What we CAN look at is the results and the personnel. And in these results, CL performance is only a small margin of their games. And even then, as you put it, PSG have performed better. Then there is the domestic performance. Admittedly, Lille won the league one season, but other than that, PSG have won the rest of the last 5 in what is considered a ‘top 5 league’.
Ajax made the CL final in 2019 and haven’t done nearly as well since then. They have played in the Europa League since then, so to conclude that PSG are on a downward trajectory, but they are not, is even mathematically questionable. They have been doing progressively worse since their peak. PSG and Atleti have not featured in the EL.
And again, there is the obvious part that they have far superior footballers. And it’s not just names either, they have far superior footballers who have actually been doing well. Atleti won a top 2/3 league last year. United have finished 3rd then 2nd in what is considered the best league in the world in 2 of the last 3 seasons, and in this terrible one, they finished top 6. I’m not sure Ajax’ domestic wins count as better. I can’t see this Ajax squad finishing anywhere near the top 2/3 in any PL season. They would no way be favourites if they played us. We are better, with better players. Our disappointment is by our standards, not theirs.
I do agree, they have a good team. They play good football, and have some good young talent. But they are not a super team, and outside of their domestic titles, are not expected to either win or challenge for anything. Which is because they are recognised as, when adjusted for context, as being an average team. Even their domestic wins, they are winning ‘just about’. This season went down to the wire, and they won the league in 2020 by virtue of the season being cancelled and they were only top on goal difference at the time if I recall correctly.
In my opinion this player is so underwhelming I am not sure why united want to sign. I could be wrong, but any clip I see, touches, passes I don't see a refined end product. If we are looking to loan him away then may be.
I would guess Ajax last season played a total of 50 games give or take, 34 in the league, 8 UCL and let's say 8 in the other cup.The teams they play against get rated too. So a win against a poor team gives you fewer point in the rating.
So it is not the wins against poor teams that puts then so high. It is their results against CL/EL teams for the past few years that put them this high up.
Imagine loaning a £60 million rated playerIn my opinion this player is so underwhelming I am not sure why united want to sign. I could be wrong, but any clip I see, touches, passes I don't see a refined end product. If we are looking to loan him away then may be.
But then again, you have yet to make a claim that is not just your opinion.
And there is plenty of algorithms and stats that give you a good inidication about how a team perform as a unit (if watching them play is not enough for you).
I also agree that Ajax is not a «super team». But neither was PSG or Atletico this year.
We need a new midfield regardless of whether FDJ is part of it or not and do we really want to start the season with McFred?Would anyone take Lisandro and Antony over De Jong b I can see that happening
Would anyone take Lisandro and Antony over De Jong b I can see that happening
Would like those 2 players but if we come out of this summer without a new midfielder it would be a complete disaster
But then again, you have yet to make a claim that is not just your opinion.
And there is plenty of algorithms and stats that give you a good inidication about how a team perform as a unit (if watching them play is not enough for you).
I also agree that Ajax is not a «super team». But neither was PSG or Atletico this year.
Would like those 2 players but if we come out of this summer without a new midfielder it would be a complete disaster
Simply, are Ajax better than PSG? Or Atletico?
Didn't watch the game, but from what I know about Nunez, he tends to love the left channel, which would be Ajax's right side.... Did you get mixed up or did he switch sides in that game?PSG no, but Atletico I'd say they were last year, yeah. I watched their loss to Benfica in the CL and they were much better, though to be fair they lost due to Nunez bullying their left-side a bit and we might be signing Ajax's LCB.
If we sign Antony to replace Ronaldo then that means we’ll be rotating rashford and martial upfront… I think if ten Hag gets us playing as a team and a unit then martial and rashford can get 15+Goals a season. Will need help from sancho/Antony aswell but with the likes of Fernandes and eriksen creating chances all game then they’ll easily put some away. Sancho and eriksen will also chip in with a few goals.
Yeah tbh it's what gives me hope even if we have a garbage window. A sign of a top manager is when his team gets raided every summer. Ajax don't have great players everywhere - sure they have some gems every year, but Ten Hag gets them playing together in a way that they just can't reproduce elsewhere, for the most part.And the very reason why their coach has developed the reputation he has is not because of what he has achieved, but largely who he has achieved it with. The whole point about the celebration of ETH is what he achieved and who he achieved it with - being largely ordinary players eho over achieved above the sum of their parts. The crowning jewels of their 18/19 team are probably the best players Ajax have produced in at least a decade in De Ligt and De Jong, and even them, they having been sensational where they have gone. Below them are the likes of Ziyech, Van de Beek, Dest and Neres who have all been different shades of poor. And the consensus is that team had better players than the current one!
To say 8 or 9 of these players are better than their United counterparts is delusion. They probably have two who would start for us, and a couple who we have hope could develop into United level players over time.
Bruno as a false 9 could work… he has good movement and makes good runs. Be interesting to see how we line up with eriksen and Bruno and if they can work well together as they both like taking up similar spaces.Not a popular opinion here but yeah I agree. There's enough talent between Martial and Rashford to cover a season. If I had to bet, I think Martial will do better in the CF role. We also might run a City style 4-4-2 (with Eriksen + Bruno at CF) or Bruno as a false 9, lots of possibilities.
Ronaldo out, Antony in
And usually a good finisher. Why not try something new and advanced. A DM on top would be amazing thoughBruno as a false 9 could work… he has good movement and makes good runs. Be interesting to see how we line up with eriksen and Bruno and if they can work well together as they both like taking up similar spaces.
And Facundo.
Ronaldo leaving I am sure has shifted his priorities.
Would like those 2 players but if we come out of this summer without a new midfielder it would be a complete disaster
100% agreed.And usually a good finisher. Why not try something new and advanced. A DM on top would be amazing though
Bruno as a false 9 could work… he has good movement and makes good runs. Be interesting to see how we line up with eriksen and Bruno and if they can work well together as they both like taking up similar spaces.
Worrying if United are prized out of him and don't have a viable fall back option
The thought of United going in to next season with Rashford (OBE version), Martial, Sancho and Elanga as the only senior forwards is ridiculous. Everyone knows what will happen.