Antony | Here we go! €100mill, contract until June 2027, option 'til 2028.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What’s the chances of an 100m bid on Monday if we get beat to Southampton…
 
They changed the price because it was late in the window and they have settled on their squad. How the feck is that messing anyone around?

And they havent gone back on anything. A club can come with lowball offers but if they're not meeting your ask, they clearly arent serious enough.

VdS stepping in because theres clearly a fractured situation going on, and given his relationship with the bidding club hes the best guy to explain what should be obvious: "pay the ask or feck off".

Its messing someone around if they don’t mention it.

Ajax “we want 80m for Antony’

United “okay leave it with us, we will have to come up with a structure as we have other deals to complete “

United bid 80

Ajax “Ahh sorry you waited too long, we now want 100m”

United negotiate again and bid 94m

Ajax “Ahh sorry we can’t get a replacement, it’s too late”

United “Too late? You knew we were coming back for the player and he wants to join, you’ve had all window to replace him?”

No wonder Antony is fuming
 
And my interpretation of the situation is, United would have followed up their interest with concrete offer. Why else would Antony be so pis*ed?
He stopped training after a decent offer was made and rejected last week and I think his frustration is more than fair to be honest. He didn't stop playing for their first two games as it doesn't sound like we made an offer and if we did, not a significant one.

I just think if we really wanted him we could have been more persistent sooner. We just seemed put off at the price earlier in the transfer window and it's not paid of for us unfortunately.
 
Sorry I edited my post but we did offer it! We have consistently been after Antony all summer. I’m sure there’s many weeks of negotiation between bids. Fans pretend we were after Martinez first and that was a mistake but it’s clearly the other way around. It reads as if we have been in talks all summer
I think the perception of being late came from fans saying they sold too many players so they won’t sell this one. That has bled into we came late for him in the window itself but that clearly isn’t true.we have matched their demands twice now.
If we had 'matched their demands' he'd be here now. The time to do it was when we bought Martinez at the latest. This mess was predictable.
 
Its messing someone around if they don’t mention it.

Ajax “we want 80m for Antony’

United “okay leave it with us, we will have to come up with a structure as we have other deals to complete “

United bid 80

Ajax “Ahh sorry you waited too long, we now want 100m”

United negotiate again and bid 94m

Ajax “Ahh sorry we can’t get a replacement, it’s too late”

United “Too late? You knew we were coming back for the player and he wants to join, you’ve had all window to replace him?”

No wonder Antony is fuming
Dont make up timelines to suit your narrative.

It was 80m for weeks and weeks. Then Ajax pre emptively came out BEFORE WE BID and said right you fecker are taking ages, we are in for a new season and the squad is settled. Its now HALF the time to find a replacement so its 100m if you want to change our minds.

We return after that and say "here is 80" :lol:

Its beggars belief how thick that is.
 
Its messing someone around if they don’t mention it.

Ajax “we want 80m for Antony’

United “okay leave it with us, we will have to come up with a structure as we have other deals to complete “

United bid 80

Ajax “Ahh sorry you waited too long, we now want 100m”

United negotiate again and bid 94m

Ajax “Ahh sorry we can’t get a replacement, it’s too late”

United “Too late? You knew we were coming back for the player and he wants to join, you’ve had all window to replace him?”

No wonder Antony is fuming
:lol: Yeah I’m sure that’s exactly how things played out.

”Leave it with us”. Feck sake.
 
Dont make up timelines to suit your narrative.

It was 80m for weeks and weeks. Then Ajax pre emptively came out BEFORE WE BID and said right you fecker are taking ages, we are in for a new season and the squad is settled. Its now HALF the time to find a replacement so its 100m if you want to change our minds.

We return 4 fecking weeks after that and say "here is 80" :lol:

Its beggars belief how thick that is.

So you think the clubs don’t keep in contact during these things?

This isn’t football manager :lol:
 
So you think the clubs don’t keep in contact during these things?

This isn’t football manager :lol:
They do. But that doesnt mean we ever once matched their ask.

We royally fecked up pursuits of Sancho, Fabregas and FdJ.

Why on earth do you think that this is remotely any feckery from Ajax, a club well versed in efficient transfers without any nonsense.
 
When he signs (it’s a matter of when not if), he’ll be like a free lion on the pitch :drool:
 
These tweets from a journalist stating Ajax are demanding 80 million, Ajax are demanding 100 million.. these are absolute bullshit. Is anyone in here actually considering the journalist is just talking nonsense/ guessing the transfer fee for clicks/attention/ whatever..

An other thing...

Ajax bought conceicao this summer for 5 million euros. The idea behind that was.. That conceicao has one year to addapt to Holland and Ajax playstyle in peace with no pressure. And that Antony could be his mentor/buddy since they both speak Portuguese. Similar to Neres showing Antony around when he was new. And that Antony being sold next summer so that conceicao could replace him next year..

This plan with conceicao clearly stated there was never a two year project with antony. Furthermore Antony has never ever mentioned this two year project. He was always in the media 'yeah I love Ajax..this club i love blabla'
 
We matched their initial ask, then went above it! Then they wanted more and more
We matched feck all. 80m was upped to 100m under fair enough circumstances. We didn't match 80 at the time. Then we didnt match 100m.

The price was common knowledge to the likes of US and we still couldn't meet it.
 
Show the link that we offered 80 plus 20
I could have sworn I saw something in this very thread that a bid was made for that.

All I can find is that Santi bloke says that we’re expected to go in at €80M + €20M

My bad. Guess it was just €80M by itself as that’s all I can find. I’ve seen so much shite on here lately (tweets) things get confusing!
 
We matched feck all. 80m was upped to 100m under fair enough circumstances. We didn't match 80 at the time. Then we didnt match 100m.

The price was common knowledge to the likes of US and we still couldn't meet it.
There's nothing fair here. They are asking what they think is the right fee and we are bidding to the extent we value him. There's no right and wrong here. If the two valuations don't meet then they don't.
 
We matched feck all. 80m was upped to 100m under fair enough circumstances. We didn't match 80 at the time. Then we didnt match 100m.

The price was common knowledge to the likes of US and we still couldn't meet it.

Antony doesn’t think so? He told them over 6 months ago about this.

Why want to get a lump of money to source a replacement? Daft Ajax
 
There's nothing fair here. They are asking what they think is the right fee and we are bidding to the extent we value him. There's no right and wrong here. If the two valuations don't meet then they don't.
Exactly.
 
Antony doesn’t think so? He told them over 6 months ago about this.

Why want to get a lump of money to source a replacement? Daft Ajax
Antony doesnt set his own price. Just like Kane cant set his own price in a golf course with Gary Neville.

Not sure what relevancy Antony has to this, the fee is set between clubs.
 
How can anyone defend the club in this situation. Do people think we get asking prices based on twitter rumours rather than actual discussion with the selling club?
 
It’s nearly been 10 years. Does any other club get transfer pursuit failures a decade ago still used against them? Jesus :lol:
Fabregas was a decade ago? Doesnt matter Ive given Sancho and FdJ to supplement it.
 
The clown family of Tampa should relinquish their annual dividends towards our next few transfers.
 
Ajax will let go because the player doesnt want to be there anymore. Theyre just trying to maximize profits.
 
Antony doesnt set his own price. Just like Kane cant set his own price in a golf course with Gary Neville.

Not sure what relevancy Antony has to this, the fee is set between clubs.

So you don’t think when a player asks to leave the club discusses that with them and their agents? (Hint. They do)
 
It’s nearly been 10 years. Does any other club get transfer pursuit failures a decade ago still used against them? Jesus :lol:

It's the CAF (and Twitter tbf), our former managers winning a football game is still used as a stick to beat united with. Surprising because the last few PSG managers have won two UCLs and an EL between themselves since they got fired, but I never see PSG fans online do the same.
 
So you don’t think when a player asks to leave the club discusses that with them and their agents? (Hint. They do)
Do you even know what you're debating anymore? What relevance does this have with the fact that Ajax appetite on the fee was never met this window?
 
If I was murtough and co., you'd just have to slap a 100m bid on the last day or before the last day of the window.

Take it or leave it. I doubt Edwin would feck us around. They are just waiting for that headline fee. Antony also has done his part to force the move. He seems to have had an agreement with his club since Feb that if a good offer comes in he can leave. Which is the norm for a club like Ajax whos business model revolves around selling players.

If still rejected then we go sign Gakpo or some other stopgap for depth.
 
It was met. The decided to change it. Keep up.
It was not met. They changed it before the bid was placed, because of fair reasons.

We did our standard incompetence and tried to bid on the old price.

Keep up.
 
It would really be absurd if we bid 100m for Antony. I would love him here though and the price wouldn't matter if we do well. If we don't, I guess the bashing and mockery continues
 
The clown family of Tampa should relinquish their annual dividends towards our next few transfers.

They need to start injecting their own money back into the club. Whether through share sales, their own private asset sales or finding new investors.

Thats why im not bothered at all by the fee.

You CANT scrimp and save from a position of weakness. When/if we build a trophy winning team, then thats when we can start making those savings by lowering our transfer fees.

Until then, it should be spend as much as possible to back the new manager.

feck them.
 
The crux of the matter here @VP89 is you think it’s reasonable for them to adjust the price whilst I don’t.
Exactly.

They are fully in their right to change appetite given a transfer window is dynamic and there are a lot of moving parts.

As long as they change their appetite preemptively and with fair reason, I dont mind. Its on us to say yes or no.

As @amolbhatia50k insinuated , we pay or we move on. Its that simple.
 
:lol: this blind support of the club always makes me laugh. Its like some sort of dimwit playground attitude. Just accept we didnt meet their price, twice, and move on.

:lol: It works both ways. You can’t set a price then raise it due to imaginary inflation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.