InfiniteBoredom
Full Member
His book value is around £50m, even if it’s true that they want him, it’s hard to imagine we would be able to get that, the Saudis aren’t that stupid.
We either take the loss or keep him for the next what 2/3 years?His book value is around £50m, even if it’s true that they want him, it’s hard to imagine we would be able to get that, the Saudis aren’t that stupid.
We will probably try to work out a loan deal next season if his situation doesn’t improve. Taking the loss with FSR is pretty painful since we are limited in how much we can spend already, next summer when his amortisation drops to about £35m, I can see some takers at that price, provided we subsidize his wages.We either take the loss or keep him for the next what 2/3 years?
We either take the loss or keep him for the next what 2/3 years?
Bingo.It's obviously impossible to sign a footballer for £85m and only pay them £70k a week. He was probably on about that at Ajax.
Market value would tell you any signing of that fee would get their agent demanding at least £180k+, depending on the club
Is there a reliable source that has confirmed that he is on a 200k a week? I can swear that I read a report saying that he will be allowed to leave on a loan if a club covers his 70k a week salary?!
17k from what I can find. His base salary maybe is 70k but is then inflated by merchandising and bonuses. A lot of sources quote wages at their absolute maximum value.It's obviously impossible to sign a footballer for £85m and only pay them £70k a week. He was probably on about that at Ajax.
Market value would tell you any signing of that fee would get their agent demanding at least £180k+, depending on the club
Generally with signing players for these kind of fees from European clubs, our typical behaviour has been to double their wages. I think we more than doubled Sancho's. Almost doubled Casemiro's. More than doubled Antony's.
Not really. It would be a £34m accounting hit, less the impact of getting his £200k/wk (£10m/yr) wages off our books. Hardly catastrophic.Problem with taking the loss is the full book value hits the accounts for this year as a loss and that would pretty much put paid to any other incomings in this window.
Why do people keep saying this without a sourceIt's obviously impossible to sign a footballer for £85m and only pay them £70k a week. He was probably on about that at Ajax.
Market value would tell you any signing of that fee would get their agent demanding at least £180k+, depending on the club
Generally with signing players for these kind of fees from European clubs, our typical behaviour has been to double their wages. I think we more than doubled Sancho's. Almost doubled Casemiro's. More than doubled Antony's.
17k from what I can find. His base salary maybe is 70k but is then inflated by merchandising and bonuses. A lot of sources quote wages at their absolute maximum value.
There was something on here a couple of weeks ago that was reporting it as 70k. That Swedish rambler I think.
I thought he was on €30k at Ajax which made giving him €200k all the more batshit insaneIt's obviously impossible to sign a footballer for £85m and only pay them £70k a week. He was probably on about that at Ajax.
Market value would tell you any signing of that fee would get their agent demanding at least £180k+, depending on the club
Generally with signing players for these kind of fees from European clubs, our typical behaviour has been to double their wages. I think we more than doubled Sancho's. Almost doubled Casemiro's. More than doubled Antony's.
Mudryk earns less than 100k pw.It's obviously impossible to sign a footballer for £85m and only pay them £70k a week. He was probably on about that at Ajax.
Market value would tell you any signing of that fee would get their agent demanding at least £180k+, depending on the club
Generally with signing players for these kind of fees from European clubs, our typical behaviour has been to double their wages. I think we more than doubled Sancho's. Almost doubled Casemiro's. More than doubled Antony's.
You literally just make stuff up to fit your agenda, 70k a week at Ajax as a 20 year oldIt's obviously impossible to sign a footballer for £85m and only pay them £70k a week. He was probably on about that at Ajax.
Market value would tell you any signing of that fee would get their agent demanding at least £180k+, depending on the club
Generally with signing players for these kind of fees from European clubs, our typical behaviour has been to double their wages. I think we more than doubled Sancho's. Almost doubled Casemiro's. More than doubled Antony's.
And people want to excuse ETH of any blame?he was at 30k euros at Ajax, we "upgraded" it to 200k pounds
And people want to excuse ETH of any blame?
How can you not see those numbers and say, wait a fecking minute lads.
Whether he was involved or not is questionable, but do you think he was completely isolated? And if he wasn't how can that be sustainable. The manager has to work with said paid employees and manage them, how much which of his players earns is absolutely important. I am pretty sure he knew what kind of wage Antony will earn, and he was okey with that. Which is shocking.I honestly doubt ETH was involved in talks about his wages
Whether he was involved or not is questionable, but do you think he was completely isolated? And if he wasn't how can that be sustainable. The manager has to work with said paid employees and manage them, how much which of his players earns is absolutely important. I am pretty sure he knew what kind of wage Antony will earn, and he was okey with that. Which is shocking.
I very much doubt the manager is involved in deciding wages for players, nor does he care. SAF was, but that’s because he basically ran the whole club.Whether he was involved or not is questionable, but do you think he was completely isolated? And if he wasn't how can that be sustainable. The manager has to work with said paid employees and manage them, how much which of his players earns is absolutely important. I am pretty sure he knew what kind of wage Antony will earn, and he was okey with that. Which is shocking.
I'm sure he was quoted a couple of weeks ago saying he was involved in deciding wages as it can affect the harmony of the squad. I might be wrong though.And people want to excuse ETH of any blame?
How can you not see those numbers and say, wait a fecking minute lads.
@HookedOnAPhelan @red_de_pologneI'm sure he was quoted a couple of weeks ago saying he was involved in deciding wages as it can affect the harmony of the squad. I might be wrong though.
Edit
To what extent do you have influence on negotiations?
"None, because I never negotiate. So when people say I spent so much money at United: no. The club has done that. They generally keep me informed of the numbers. But I don't know that in detail. What I do know is what the player will earn, because I deal with the hierarchy in the dressing room. But what the transfer fee is, or what the agent earns: I am not involved in any of that."
So he's kept informed of the numbers but never thought to say " hang on that's far too much ".
What? He confirms he’s not involved in negotiations, but kept informed on wages for squad management reasons.@HookedOnAPhelan @red_de_pologne
So? I’d say you have a too simple way of looking at things. You can’t successfully manage individuals without all factors being correctly in place.
He pretty much confirms he knows how much players earn and why is it important. He could have intervened at any time if he felt it would ruin his teams working environment. By the looks of it, he felt it was okey for Antony to go from 25k to 200K after the move, not sure how anyone with reasonable thinking can excuse the manager of the team for such lack of judgement.What? He confirms he’s not involved in negotiations, but kept informed on wages for squad management reasons.
We don’t even know what Antony is on (or was on at Ajax) anyway, so it’s a pointless debate.
Nah, you're talking out of your ass, and making assumptions just so you can shit on the manager.He pretty much confirms he knows how much players earn and why is it important. He could have intervened at any time if he felt it would ruin his teams working environment. By the looks of it, he felt it was okey for Antony to go from 25k to 200K after the move, not sure how anyone with reasonable thinking can excuse the manager of the team for such lack of judgement.
I'm sure he was quoted a couple of weeks ago saying he was involved in deciding wages as it can affect the harmony of the squad. I might be wrong though.
Edit
To what extent do you have influence on negotiations?
"None, because I never negotiate. So when people say I spent so much money at United: no. The club has done that. They generally keep me informed of the numbers. But I don't know that in detail. What I do know is what the player will earn, because I deal with the hierarchy in the dressing room. But what the transfer fee is, or what the agent earns: I am not involved in any of that."
So he's kept informed of the numbers but never thought to say " hang on that's far too much ".
The hierarchy in the dressing room..
I wonder what his logic was here when he green-flagged Antony coming on higher wages than Bruno?
Love waking up to good newsHe's not going anywhere, he wants to stay and fight for his paycheck.
This is a good summary by Swedish Rumble on why you should take reports in the press and elsewhere about wages with a huge grain of salt
This is a good summary by Swedish Rumble on why you should take reports in the press and elsewhere about wages with a huge grain of salt