DickDastardly
New Member
Can he play as a left-back?
He'd probably pick a second yellow by HT.
Can he play as a left-back?
Not with his decision making.
Very bad, don't know why he was brought in.
Spinning?He's been here a year and apart from cutting in and shooting is he good at anything else with the ball?
Hopefully not tactical position cos I reckon we could have got the same for 10m if that's the case.
Even his cut to the left and shoot far post has been sussed or degraded over Time with us.
Reckon if he was a youth player we would have loaned him with view to sell (probably for 1m).
According to a lot of people on here his ability to hold the width is invaluableHe's been here a year and apart from cutting in and shooting is he good at anything else with the ball?
Hopefully not tactical position cos I reckon we could have got the same for 10m if that's the case.
Even his cut to the left and shoot far post has been sussed or degraded over Time with us.
Reckon if he was a youth player we would have loaned him with view to sell (probably for 1m).
Spinning?
I think I can see the merit in him playing above others we have, but we really could have spent the money better (guess that can be said about a few players)According to a lot of people on here his ability to hold the width is invaluable
Yes that's I good point on servicing hojlund, there was so many on here who were insistent Antony was the right signing because we needed an inverted right forward but hojlund would prob benefit from someone who would cross the ball inI think I can see the merit in him playing above others we have, but we really could have spent the money better (guess that can be said about a few players)
Really think we need to see 20 g/a at least from him but I can't for now, see him making that jump due to his limitations.
I especially cant see him being the wide man that will benefit hoijlund
Was pace really the problem? I think he showed a good burst on that counter. It was the decision/execution that was the problem. Which is the problem a high percentage of the time with him.Awful cameo.
Also, zero fecking pace. And for a winger that. Yikes.
He has pace but we never see it when there's a defender in front of him. Coming on with fresh legs against a full back who was on a yellow. Hickey didn't get challenged all game.Was pace really the problem? I think he showed a good burst on that counter. It was the decision/execution that was the problem. Which is the problem a high percentage of the time with him.
Was pace really the problem? I think he showed a good burst on that counter. It was the decision/execution that was the problem. Which is the problem a high percentage of the time with him.
I thought it was a great pass, you can see Hojlund stutter just as Antony plays it and that’s why he didn’t get through 1v1Of course it was a problem.
Give that counter to any other speed merchant in the Prem and you've got yourself a goal.
It's 2 on 1 ffs. And that shit pass. Awful.
He did alright. Just his presence gave us a lot more balance in attack. It's just a necessity playing with 2 actual wingers these days and we need to stop trying to ignore that.
I thought it was a great pass, you can see Hojlund stutter just as Antony plays it and that’s why he didn’t get through 1v1
I don't think that's remotely true. You're exaggerating. There was still a lot to do and a long distance to goal. The numbers would probably say such an opportunity is not converted at the frequency you're stating.Of course it was a problem.
Give that counter to any other speed merchant in the Prem and you've got yourself a goal.
It's 2 on 1 ffs. And that shit pass. Awful.
We were equally, if not worse when he came on, and he played like he usually plays. I seriously can't understand how some of you can lie to yourself. Created nothing coming in as a winger later in the game, 0 crosses, 0 key passes, did absolutely nothing. 4 forward passes in total is everything he did, and one of them was that counter attack where he was 10 meters ahead of their defender and he decided to pass the ball to their other defender who was marking Hojlund.
Another poor performance from a nothing winger.
I don't think that's remotely true. You're exaggerating. There was still a lot to do and a long distance to goal. The numbers would probably say such an opportunity is not converted at the frequency you're stating.
Besides, he got away from those chasing, he simply decided to pass and it didn't work.
I thought it was a great pass, you can see Hojlund stutter just as Antony plays it and that’s why he didn’t get through 1v1
ThisI actually quite like his performance today. We look much more balance as a team on the right with him on the pitch.
Yes but it's a lot harder to travel with the ball than without it so even if a player is alone it doesn't mean goal. That simply isn't a goal with the frequency you're saying. When there's a distance between picking up the ball and the goal the more chance it breaks down. That's just how football is and the statistics will bear it out irrespective of whether they're the last man or not.What the feck man.
He was ALONE on the half way mark.
All you need to do is run with the ball.
Give that same position to Garnacho or Hojlund and that's a goal.
Which is pretty fecking sad for a winger to be that slow.