Antoine Griezmann

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have heard - and don't snigger, this is true - that Mourinho asked Eric Olhats to make this statement in the media to fire up the current United forward line following Ibra's injury. He wants them fighting for their places with news that Griezmann is coming in.

Oh, and he is DEFINITELY coming, from what I can gather. He's been dreaming of that No.7 shirt for years. And it's his this summer. £85m.


I'm choosing to believe you on this, so how reliable is your source?
 
One of the great things about Mourinho is that he doesn't waste time on players that are unrealistic. If we have shown interest in him, the manager thinks we can get him. He is generally pretty good at ending speculation through media. I reckon that once the season is over, Jose will address transfers and if he doesn't outright deny Griezmann rumors, he's going to be our player before the end of June.
Yes that's true. Looks like whether we get CL next season is key in this transfer.
 
You don't negotiate with a release clause matching "opening bid".
I remember reading a long ass article explaining the complications relating to release clauses. I don't remember all the details but remember the article listing the amount a club will go through to try and avoid the situation. Release clauses can of course be triggered, but it's only ever done if the club rejects official transfer bids.

I actually think clubs are happy to pay more than the release clause at times as long as the offer is officially accepted by the owning club. This is because it avoids having to go through legal proceedings if the owning clubs refuses to sell via the usual transfer process. The process of purchasing a player via triggering their release clause is seriously complex which is why it rarely happens, and in cases that they are triggered, I think it may be to the financial detriment of the player as well as the club.
 
I don't understand, why talk about a concrete interest if he wants to come? Obviously, he wants to let the other clubs know that United did a move and they are welcome to pay more, which would probably mean he's not coming at the end.
I am torn on this one.
 
I don't understand, why talk about a concrete interest if he wants to come? Obviously, he wants to let the other clubs know that United did a move and they are welcome to pay more, which would probably mean he's not coming at the end.
I am torn on this one.
Don't think this is always the case.
 
I remember reading a long ass article explaining the complications relating to release clauses. I don't remember all the details but remember the article listing the amount a club will go through to try and avoid the situation. Release clauses can of course be triggered, but it's only ever done if the club rejects official transfer bids.

I actually think clubs are happy to pay more than the release clause at times as long as it is via the offer is accepted by the owning club. This is because it avoids having to go through legal proceedings if the owning clubs refuses to sell via the usual transfer process. Release clauses are seriously complex to trigger which is why it rarely happens, and in cases that they are triggered, I think it may be to the financial detriment of the player as well as the club.
Apparently they changed the rules to make the release clause easier to trigger or something

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ci...-could-make-buying-liga-manchester-united/amp
 
I remember reading a long ass article explaining the complications relating to release clauses. I don't remember all the details but remember the article listing the amount a club will go through to try and avoid the situation. Release clauses can of course be triggered, but it's only ever done if the club rejects official transfer bids.

I actually think clubs are happy to pay more than the release clause at times as long as the offer is officially accepted by the owning club. This is because it avoids having to go through legal proceedings if the owning clubs refuses to sell via the usual transfer process. The process of purchasing a player via triggering their release clause is seriously complex which is why it rarely happens, and in cases that they are triggered, I think it may be to the financial detriment of the player as well as the club.

Apparently they changed the rules to make the release clause easier to trigger or something

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ci...-could-make-buying-liga-manchester-united/amp
I think the issue is that most release clauses require the buyer to pay the entire amount upfront whereas in a "normal" transfer the fee is paid with instalments.
 
Woody is so good to us muppets, the absolute joy every transfer season brings us compared to the likes of Liverpool who has to settle for Whatever Mcwatheverface each summer :drool:
 
Yes that's true. Looks like whether we get CL next season is key in this transfer.

You're right. Not only from his point of view but also whether we like to believe it or not, losing CL has a sizable hit on our revenue. CL qualification will decide if our net spend in the summer is 100m or 150m in my opinion.
 
Woody is so good to us muppets, the absolute joy every transfer season brings us compared to the likes of Liverpool who has to settle for Whatever Mcwatheverface each summer :drool:
Yeah but Pogba was like 300 million larr and what's his face is just as good.

I think IF Atletico wins CL Griezmann will sign for us if we are in CL. He won't go from Champion to Europa League but I suspect if they fall just short again but are given the green light from FIFA to sign again I think he will fancy one more crack with Atletico. The man has options and knows we along with more options will come back next summer.
 
Yeah but Pogba was like 300 million larr and what's his face is just as good.

I think IF Atletico wins CL Griezmann will sign for us if we are in CL. He won't go from Champion to Europa League but I suspect if they fall just short again but are given the green light from FIFA to sign again I think he will fancy one more crack with Atletico. The man has options and knows we along with more options will come back next summer.

Yeah that is where I am at with this deal at the moment as well. CL and he is bang on ours if we want him, no CL and it all becomes a bit more iffy.
 
Why does he do that retarded celebration though?
Brand recognition. Do something simple that's associated with you. For a footballer that frequently scores goals a celebration is a sure thing. Nani does his flip, Raúl kissed his wedding ring, Bale does that heart thing, Ronaldo super saiyans.
 
Jim white on talk sport said earlier today that United have already made an opening bid of £85 million.

:lol:
That would be so typical of our Ed.

''Mr. Woodward, the release clause for our player is £85m.''

Ed to the club secretary ''Send an OPENING bid of £85m''
 
You're right. Not only from his point of view but also whether we like to believe it or not, losing CL has a sizable hit on our revenue. CL qualification will decide if our net spend in the summer is 100m or 150m in my opinion.
That's right, I think the Adidas deal will be cut by 30% if we don't make CL this season.
 
So much smoke regarding this transfer that it's hard to believe it won't happen.
The only thing is, with the transfer ban, I can only see this deal going through if the full 85m is paid in full, which is a large sum in one go.

I could be wrong, but I would even say the Pogba deal would be paid in instalments
 
So much smoke regarding this transfer that it's hard to believe it won't happen.
The only thing is, with the transfer ban, I can only see this deal going through if the full 85m is paid in full, which is a large sum in one go.

I could be wrong, but I would even say the Pogba deal would be paid in instalments
I find 85m being paid without instalments extremely hard to believe. Don't you think there would be conditions and clauses attached to specific figures. For example, We pay 10m if he wins ballon d'or. 15m if he scores 20 goals and 60m as the actual fee, or wouldn't that work with the buyout clause?
 
I find 85m being paid without instalments extremely hard to believe. Don't you think there would be conditions and clauses attached to specific figures. For example, We pay 10m if he wins ballon d'or. 15m if he scores 20 goals and 60m as the actual fee, or wouldn't that work with the buyout clause?

I am only going off Football Manager here, but I'd say that a buyout has to be paid in full.
If there was a lot of leverage on how it could be paid I think a lot more buyout clauses would be activated with stupid clauses.
 
I find 85m being paid without instalments extremely hard to believe. Don't you think there would be conditions and clauses attached to specific figures. For example, We pay 10m if he wins ballon d'or. 15m if he scores 20 goals and 60m as the actual fee, or wouldn't that work with the buyout clause?
I think it has to be paid in full and at once, if we want to trigger the clause. Of course, we could negotiate a mutually beneficial deal with Atlético matching the clause (or a little bit above it to sweeten the deal for them) and pay that in installments, or insert conditions to be fulfilled, but that would just be a regular bid being accepted and not a triggering of the release clause.

If we could put conditions into the triggering of the release clause, we could say that we'll give you £85m but not until 2050, at which point £85m might not be very much.
 
I am only going off Football Manager here, but I'd say that a buyout has to be paid in full.
If there was a lot of leverage on how it could be paid I think a lot more buyout clauses would be activated with stupid clauses.

Buy out clauses are rarely triggered, clubs tend to agree on a transfer that matches the clause and in that case installments are used like it is usually.
 
That's right, I think the Adidas deal will be cut by 30% if we don't make CL this season.


But the good news on this is - if you can call it good news - if we do miss out on the Champions League this year, we will indeed miss out on 30% of the adidas deal. But I assumed it was 30% of £750m that we would not be paid, but it is only (ha - only) 30% of the £75m from next year (for not qualifying) that won't be paid - so basically £22.5m. 1/20th of our annual income.

It's not as big a hit as I thought it was.

But, it's not about the money. I would be devastated if we miss out on CL because I feel Mourinho is a CL/PL manager. The amount of times he has handled both to almost-perfection is staggering. He has won EIGHT league titles in 14 seasons as a manager (12 full seasons) and been in the semi-finals of the Champions League SEVEN times in 11 seasons as a CL manager. Those are some Ferguson-ass like stats, and probably then some.

He is gearing up, in my genuine opinion - us for domestic and European glory. I've no doubt about that. But we gotta get back in the CL next season. If we are still in the Europa next season then our EPL form and title chances become tougher. For me, it's CL next season and we balance the whole season perfectly where we could genuinely just turn back into being one of Europe's elite or it's Europa next season and a very tough balance and we fail to fight for an EPL title challenge.

Qualifying for the CL next seasons quickens the process for the club to get to the level us fans are all dying for us to get to.
 
Last edited:
But the good news on this is - if you can call it good news - if we do miss out on the Champions League this year, we will indeed miss out on 30% of the adidas deal. But I assumed it was 30% of £750m that we would not be paid, but it is only (ha - only) 30% of the £75m from next year (for not qualifying) that won't be paid - so basically £22.5m. 1/20th of our annual income.

It's not as big a hit as I thought it was.

But, it's not about the money. I would be devastated if we miss out on CL because I feel Mourinho is a CL/PL manager. The amount of times he has handled both to almost-perfection is staggering. As a manager, he has won eight league titles in 14 seasons as a manager (12 full seasons) and been in the semi-finals of the Champions League six times in 11 seasons as a CL manager. Those are some Ferguson-ass like stats, and probably then some.

He is gearing up, in my genuine opinion - us for domestic and European glory. I've no doubt about that. But we gotta get back in the CL next season. If we are still in the Europa next season then our EPL form and title chances become tougher. For me, it's CL next season and we balance the whole season perfectly where we could genuinely just turn back into being one of Europe's elite or it's Europa next season and a very tough balance and we fail to fight for an EPL title challenge.

Qualifying for the CL next seasons quickens the process for the club to get to the level us fans are all dying for us to get to.

I bet that Woody would be able to do something on that penalty if we have been performing well for Adidas commercially.
 
If Jose wants a player and he's within reach, Ed will get it for him. And Ed certainly doesn't feck about cos he's a muppet himself!
 
Friend of mine who has sources says it's happening and he was right about all transfers last summer including Bailly who I certainly had never heard of before we signed him.
 
But the good news on this is - if you can call it good news - if we do miss out on the Champions League this year, we will indeed miss out on 30% of the adidas deal. But I assumed it was 30% of £750m that we would not be paid, but it is only (ha - only) 30% of the £75m from next year (for not qualifying) that won't be paid - so basically £22.5m. 1/20th of our annual income.

It's not as big a hit as I thought it was.

But, it's not about the money. I would be devastated if we miss out on CL because I feel Mourinho is a CL/PL manager. The amount of times he has handled both to almost-perfection is staggering. As a manager, he has won eight league titles in 14 seasons as a manager (12 full seasons) and been in the semi-finals of the Champions League six times in 11 seasons as a CL manager. Those are some Ferguson-ass like stats, and probably then some.

He is gearing up, in my genuine opinion - us for domestic and European glory. I've no doubt about that. But we gotta get back in the CL next season. If we are still in the Europa next season then our EPL form and title chances become tougher. For me, it's CL next season and we balance the whole season perfectly where we could genuinely just turn back into being one of Europe's elite or it's Europa next season and a very tough balance and we fail to fight for an EPL title challenge.

Qualifying for the CL next seasons quickens the process for the club to get to the level us fans are all dying for us to get to.

That's fantastic news re: the finances! Do you have a source?
 
Apart from CL football, the most important thing IMO will be convincing him that we are just shy of being the top dogs in England and he is the player to make the difference. I don't think it's going to be enough (although I could be wrong) to say he's going to be part of a project which will take 3-4 years, he needs to come in and make an instant impact. Thankfully, he is actually good enough to do so. Wages and stuff should be a formality. It also depends a lot on the player and his ambitions of course, but it will help if he feels he's coming to a team with top players such as Pogba, Mkhi and hopefully Ibra alongside any other signings we might make.
 
But the good news on this is - if you can call it good news - if we do miss out on the Champions League this year, we will indeed miss out on 30% of the adidas deal. But I assumed it was 30% of £750m that we would not be paid, but it is only (ha - only) 30% of the £75m from next year (for not qualifying) that won't be paid - so basically £22.5m. 1/20th of our annual income.

It's not as big a hit as I thought it was.

But, it's not about the money. I would be devastated if we miss out on CL because I feel Mourinho is a CL/PL manager. The amount of times he has handled both to almost-perfection is staggering. As a manager, he has won eight league titles in 14 seasons as a manager (12 full seasons) and been in the semi-finals of the Champions League six times in 11 seasons as a CL manager. Those are some Ferguson-ass like stats, and probably then some.

He is gearing up, in my genuine opinion - us for domestic and European glory. I've no doubt about that. But we gotta get back in the CL next season. If we are still in the Europa next season then our EPL form and title chances become tougher. For me, it's CL next season and we balance the whole season perfectly where we could genuinely just turn back into being one of Europe's elite or it's Europa next season and a very tough balance and we fail to fight for an EPL title challenge.

Qualifying for the CL next seasons quickens the process for the club to get to the level us fans are all dying for us to get to.
Ok, well it's not as bad as I thought. Agreed, if we make top 4 this season, at least we can see a progression relative to our competition as well. We're in the running for both top 4 and winning the Europa league, so hopefully we can achieve at least one of them and qualify.
 
Woody is so good to us muppets, the absolute joy every transfer season brings us compared to the likes of Liverpool who has to settle for Whatever Mcwatheverface each summer :drool:
:lol:
 
You don't negotiate with a release clause matching "opening bid".
Could have in this case. Aren't Spanish release clauses complicated in that they require the player to pay it out and it all gets a bit complicated? Might have just made a direct 'bid' that matches the release clause to avoid all the complications and hassles.
 
I find 85m being paid without instalments extremely hard to believe. Don't you think there would be conditions and clauses attached to specific figures. For example, We pay 10m if he wins ballon d'or. 15m if he scores 20 goals and 60m as the actual fee, or wouldn't that work with the buyout clause?

Madrid paid us £80m in one lump sum for Ronaldo.

Could have in this case. Aren't Spanish release clauses complicated in that they require the player to pay it out and it all gets a bit complicated? Might have just made a direct 'bid' that matches the release clause to avoid all the complications and hassles.

I think the rules around them changed to make the process simpler, but I'm not 100% sure. I do know there's no way you'd make an opening bid at the amount of a clause though, it would just be unimaginably dumb.

Release clauses in UK contracts usually just say that if a transfer fee of £X is offered then the club will allow the player to negotiate with the offering club for a move. Sometimes they are more specific as to which clubs they relate to, for example the offer must come from a club playing in the CL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.