fake
I think this is spot on.
I don't think there is a single signing for us that makes less sense than Greizmann. He would undoubtedly come in and be one of the best players at the club, but there just is no natural place for him to fit into the side without neutering what we already have.
I think this is a real test of whether we have pretensions of being a well managed, and structured, club or whether we're simply a new Galactico project.
We will probably buy more than one player this summer.Couldn't agree more. We have a wealth of players that can play his position(s) and, though this will probably get ridiculed, I'm not sure there is a huge difference between him and Mata. One just plays every game.
Things we actually need: LB, CM
Things we probably need: CB
Things we don't need: AM, GK
Genuinely would rather we signed a good LB or CM than Griezmann.
Couldn't agree more. We have a wealth of players that can play his position(s) and, though this will probably get ridiculed, I'm not sure there is a huge difference between him and Mata. One just plays every game.
Things we actually need: LB, CM
Things we probably need: CB
Things we don't need: AM, GK
Genuinely would rather we signed a good LB or CM than Griezmann.
Has this been posted yet?
Think of the potential options next year for our front six...
------Bakayoko-----
--Herrera---Pogba--
Miki----------Martial
-----Griezman------
Would love to see some of that !!
And that still leaves Mata and Rashford as subs!!
Wait people think we shouldn't go for him because we have players that can play his position? So then why haven't those players scored us more goals?
Of course we do. Right now we are playing with Martial as LIF and Micky as ROM. Just change it around, put Micky on LOM, and put Griez in RIF. Would suite even better to our fullbacks, Valencia definitely being the more attacking minded, no matter if you have Darmian, Shaw or Blind on the other side. Griez would probably interpret his position close to a second striker, but that's no problem with Valencia as a runner on the right. Would be the absolute perfect player for us. When a player of that class wants to join us, we should be all over him without a doubt. Baffling how anyone could see this different..those players make/made the difference between Real, Barca, and the rest of the world.No, it's because we don't have any use for players that play in his position in our current system.
It's possible we might retain the 433 but rotate Ibra with Antoine to keep him fit throughout the season.
If we sign Griezmann, there's absolutely zero chance he'll be rotated with anyone - he'd be a guaranteed starter.
There is little to no chance he is going to play every game in every competition, he is still human, he will get tired, lose form and deal with injuries like every other player.
He will get rest throughout the season is when I can see Ibra leading the line, or coming off the bench offering us a more physical outlet.
There is little to no chance he is going to play every game in every competition, he is still human, he will get tired, lose form and deal with injuries like every other player.
He will get rest throughout the season is when I can see Ibra leading the line, or coming off the bench offering us a more physical outlet.
Posts like this is continue to baffle me. As many others have said multiple times, signing Griezmann does not mean we won't sign any other areas. It is not a one or the other scenario. We have money, we will be getting rid of a lot of deadwood come this summer and will have positions to fill in the squad.
Not signing one of the world's best players in a key area of the pitch because we need to strengthen other positions is silly. If Jose feels he needs both, he will sign both. Woodward wants to spend cash and Jose knows how to manage a team.
Griezmann and Veratti in the summer. You heard it here first.
Mou's most likely banking on Martial being ready to lead the line by then.Alright to have Griezmann, if that happens, but then, who is playing in the centre once Zlatan is gone?
I agree with you, but didn't we say that about Ibra? And now look at him. Very rarely misses a game, and I don't believe he's been subbed once when he's started. Which is incredible when you think about it really.
If Ibra continues on his current trajectory, I can't see him being rotated/ rested much next season either. Which is why I think Griezmann would play just behind him if he was to sign.
NoI would be all for Antoine playing off Ibra, but if that is the case we need a very good player to slot next to Pogba, we don't have anyone defensive enough in the squad at the moment.
I agree with this. Griezmann is legitimately a world class talent. As much as most of us like Mata (for good reason), Griezmann is at a different level. He'd walk into the first team of almost any club in world football, and certainly of every single club in England. If he can be had, then the club shouldn't hesitate. He's a creative player who knows how to score, is a great age, is seemingly a United fan, and would be a very marketable asset.I understand the concerns of fitting Griezmann in this team, but people have already begun to underrate his talent.
There's definitely a difference between Griezmann and Mata. Griezmann just finished in the top 3 for the POTY vote in 2016. Mata's never been close to that.
How much do you reckon he would cost. 60 70 80 90million?
It wouldn't even surprise me if we broke the transfer record again. We seem to be rolling in it.
http://en.as.com/en/2016/06/23/football/1466681304_641368.htmlAtlético Madrid have confirmed that forward Antoine Griezmann has extended his contract at the LaLiga side.
The new agreement sees the France international, who is currently with Les Bleus at Euro 2016, commit his future to Atlético until 2021.
The 25-year-old's fresh contract also includes an increased release clause, which is now set at 100 million euros.
Probably will be around 100million sterling by the time this happens, given the economic climate.
Probably will be around 100million sterling by the time this happens, given the economic climate.
Atlético will not sell for an amount lower than the predetermined clause, irrespective of his form or performances over the coming months. They are unlikely to attract attackers of his class immediately to carry the burden of the attack, Simeone's future might lie at another club (which would create more uncertainty wrt. sporting prospects), they have to resolve the financial constraints placed by the new Wanda Metropolitano stadium (which could also lead to the reported sale of Saúl), and - they know full well that United is flush with cash and can afford the fee specified by the release clause. Atlético will be well within their rights to employ Athletic Club's strategy of not budging an inch, and selling him only for the Pogba-esque figure - a statement of intent that they will not be strong-armed into selling their best player(s) at a lower than peak market value fee by the financial elite.Can certainly do with him playing like shite to lower the price.