Maybe just maybe, they'd rather the money be spent on another area of the team, or just give some of our current players a try out. Martial and Rashford are both going to stupendous players. I hope they don't realise their potentials elsewhere. They will both require game time as strikers, if we carry on buying established strikers then then will obviously leave. As long term neither are wingers.
No, that's revisionism. France tried a number of things trying to get the balance right. Shifting Pogba (Romania); dropping both of them (Albania); playing him in his correct position with Griezmann ahead of him (Switzerland); Switching Pogba to his proper position at half time (Ireland) and on it went.for 99 percent of it, yes they did.
Griezmann and Pogba have been playing in the same side since 2014. To have so few combined games of note in all that time has to be an issue irrespective of the others in the side. Even Maradona's Argentina got it right once or twice before it fell apart.United have a different setup than France anyway, different characteristics. France are a lot slower up top for one thing with Giroud and Payet slowing everything the feck down.
That's a generic cliché that doesn't address the point that this particular pairing are not masked in the same wonder and unknown element as other big players coming into a new side. We have a body of work readily available for examination and it is that which provides more doubt than if these two had never played on a pitch as team-mates before.All big signings are a risk. it's what the manager is paid to do.
Neymar has always played some variant of the left-sided position ever since he played for Santos. Messi has had stellar seasons in both positions and has pros and cons to either role. His physical decline and the amount of knocks he gets in the middle of the park in that role are also fair factors to consider. Neither player has been compromised because of Saurez. Neymar was on fire when he had no off-the-field issues to deal with. His game has dwindled somewhat since then, not because he's on the left. What compromises do you think either one of them has made? Messi is clearly the boss; he does what he wants when he wants and the others defer; he's clearly going to end up as a playmaker once his acceleration deserts him and he actually enjoys playing either of them in on goal. His goal tally is still high, but his assist tally must surely have shot through the roof.Is Neymar at his best out on the left? Is Messi at his best dropping deep and picking up the ball after a season of 90 goals in a calendar year playing through the middle? Those two made sacrifices on the pitch to let Suarez come into the side and create the most fearsome front line of all time.
Yes that might happen, but Griezmann has shot to complete prominence as a SS with free rein to do what he wants when he wants. Putting him back on the wing simply begs the question of why. You pay so much, you buy 'as is' and don't mess with it, surely? For £80m+, if this is the line of thinking, you can buy a quality LWF and put a fair chunk of change towards another position or cover wages.Who says Jose hasn't looked at Martial or Rashford and earmarked them as our number 9 next season? Play Griezmann on the left as an inside forward that allows us to keep our shape?
Because Griezmann is not that type of player where others are running off him. His runs are for him and they usually complete a play, be it by him shooting, or trying to deliver a final ball. If you want a traditional style in that role with an all-encompassing forward then you can take that same £80m and plonk it on Juve's desk or go for other forwards who thrive in that style.Or play him as a false 9 that allows Pogba to make the runs beyond him, that allows Pogba to provide the physical presence in the attacking third?
But forgive my crudeness here: Herrara was not bought as a ready-made superstar player with universal agreement he is one of the best in the world. Pogba, Zlatan Mhikitaryan were, and they've been played as they should be - in their positions of repute, and they've delivered. Martial is different because his age and the fact he himself is still finding his feet makes him pliable. We don't even know whether he'll become a striker or remain a wide-man, such is his rawness. Griezmann is a superstar who has already carved out a particular style with particular idiosyncracies we'd be doing him a disservice to ignore. If he's bought and not played in the role he has made his name in, and then so happens to fail, that is all on the club and manager, just as it would be with any established superstar.All I know is if we sign Griezmann then it's not due to the exact role as he's playing at the moment. The same way Herrera wasn't a deep laying midfielder, the same way Martial wasn't an inside forward. Players can adapt to their highest level.
I don't want this kind of negativity around me!So I don't want Griezmann
True. It's been proven time and again that players get even better when they have quality all around them.This is bollocks tbf, if Martial and Pogba are that good, they would fulfill that potential. Singing a World class player and improving the squad wouldn't hinder them from achieving that.
Where do you see us playing him? For me, he isn't worth the fees we'll have to pay if we play him out wide. If we play him centrally, we're back to playing pogba deep in a middle 2 which isn't where he excels. The other option is if we play him in place of Ibra which a) won't happen next season and b) will require a very big change in how Jose likes his CF.Absolutely has to be our #1 target in the summer.
The role Martial played against Boro. Inside channels, playing off Ibra.Where do you see us playing him?
Well Rooney pretty much plays as a left forward when he plays now doesn't he? With the midfield turned into a more traditional '3' and with Pogba the most advanced.Does singing Griezmann not signal the end of Rooney's United Career? Surely he'd play in the hole behind Zlatan and run in behind him for knock downs etc.
I could see Either Zlatan leaving or a deminished role for Martial
But its also been proven that unbalanced teams filled with quality players don't always achieve moreso in this league. Why not sign a top class CB, a 6, box to box cm for cover and another wide forward for depth? The players we actually need and let Zlatan, Martial, Rashford, Mkhitaryen, Mata and the new signing fashion out a forward line? Because as things stand we do have a capable frontline in Martial, Ibra and Mkhi but do we really have enough industry in midfield to revert to a midfield two whose half is Pogba? And should we lose the creativity that Pogba brings when he is free to roam. The uncertainties are too many with this signing to justify pushing the boat out, imo.I don't want this kind of negativity around me!
True. It's been proven time and again that players get even better when they have quality all around them.
I keep seeing this being said and I can't understand how someone can be so dense. We will sign more than one player!!But its also been proven that unbalanced teams filled with quality players don't always achieve moreso in this league. Why not sign a top class CB, a 6, box to box cm for cover and another wide forward for depth? The players we actually need and let Zlatan, Martial, Rashford, Mkhitaryen, Mata and the new signing fashion out a forward line? Because as things stand we do have a capable frontline in Martial, Ibra and Mkhi but do we really have enough industry in midfield to revert to a midfield two whose half is Pogba? And should we lose the creativity that Pogba brings when he is free to roam. The uncertainties are too many with this signing to justify pushing the boat out, imo.
Rooney's end is already here. He's far from a key player anymore, doesn't even make our best 11 these days. If he hopefully beats the scoring record this year I imagine he will go back to Everton or abroad this summer.Does singing Griezmann not signal the end of Rooney's United Career? Surely he'd play in the hole behind Zlatan and run in behind him for knock downs etc.
Ultimately, Pogba is the better player of them two, so if he has to be sacrificed we should look somewhere else, no matter how good Griezmann might be (I'm not really convinced he's THAT good anyway).
Maybe they think £80m on one player means there won't be enough to spend on other top class recruits.I keep seeing this being said and I can't understand how someone can be so dense. We will sign more than one player!!
Obviously spending 80m on one player affects the money available for other recruits. We are not backed by some kleptocratic middle eastern dictatorship, in case you haven't noticed, we operate on a budget!I keep seeing this being said and I can't understand how someone can be so dense. We will sign more than one player!!
Herrera is not the team's main creative force Pogba is and will be the one most affected by this signing. Herrera will be relegated to squad player but with that we lose the vital work rate that affords Pogba the freedom to do his thing.Are you convinced about Herrera?
That's been proved to be wrong time and again as well. If Mourinho is going to be here for the long run, I definitely want him to splurge big on top quality. It's been said that Matuidi was the alternate to Pogba, for example. Nobody is complaining now about Pogba's cost, are they.Maybe they think £80m on one player means there won't be enough to spend on other top class recruits.
I do agree about not shoehorning people in, just for the sake of it. But the money argument is not convincingBut its also been proven that unbalanced teams filled with quality players don't always achieve moreso in this league. Why not sign a top class CB, a 6, box to box cm for cover and another wide forward for depth? The players we actually need and let Zlatan, Martial, Rashford, Mkhitaryen, Mata and the new signing fashion out a forward line? Because as things stand we do have a capable frontline in Martial, Ibra and Mkhi but do we really have enough industry in midfield to revert to a midfield two whose half is Pogba? And should we lose the creativity that Pogba brings when he is free to roam. The uncertainties are too many with this signing to justify pushing the boat out, imo.
I want to see Mourinho spend big on quality but perhaps another player would be better. What if Verratti was available for £80m? What if those people think two midfielders are necessary and the cost would be near £100m? It wouldn't be possible to have both those things and at the same time buy Griezmann.That's been proved to be wrong time and again as well. If Mourinho is going to be here for the long run, I definitely want him to splurge big on top quality. It's been said that Matuidi was the alternate to Pogba, for example. Nobody is complaining now about Pogba's cost, are they.
We buy Ousmane Dembélé in a few years from Dortmund and have a attacking French 3 of Griezmann-Martial-Dembélé with Pogba behind them. Vive la France!
Really, once you get over the tedious groupthink on here that says that Pogba can only play in a three-man midfield, and realize that actually, all he needs in a 2 is his midfield partner being a holding passer rather than Marouane fecking Fellaini then it becomes easy to see how Griezmann would work.
You mean like buying Pogba stopped us from signing other top class recruits? The same nonsense was said about him.Maybe they think £80m on one player means there won't be enough to spend on other top class recruits.
Ibra came on a free and Mkhitaryan only had only one year left on his contract. Suppose there are people who want to buy a top CB, a top DM and a back-up CM: how much do you think that would run us? £40m, £60m, £40m? That totals £140m. I don't think there's enough to buy Griezmann then.You mean like buying Pogba stopped us from signing other top class recruits? The same nonsense was said about him.
We needed Pogba because we lacked a world class outfield player to lead us to a new dawn and if the players were compatible I wouldn't have a problem with this signing. Looking at Pogba I see a Gerard/Lampard/Yaya type who though different types had more or less the same impact further up the pitch but lacked the discipline and dedication to be top class in a deeper role. By signing Griezmann we are going to shoehorn one of the two but currently Pogba is doing very well and has been unlucky in front of goal himself and seen poor finishing cost him some assists. We are onto a good thing why ruin it?That's been proved to be wrong time and again as well. If Mourinho is going to be here for the long run, I definitely want him to splurge big on top quality. It's been said that Matuidi was the alternate to Pogba, for example. Nobody is complaining now about Pogba's cost, are they.
The financial argument is as convincing as the technical one imo because we already have a player performing well in the role he'd come in to play so its better we push the boat out for that top class controlling CM, for that elusive WC CB and for that explosive wideman that helps us bring the best out of Pogba and Zlatan. Unless of course if you believe that we have the capacity to sign one 80m pound player plus two or three for 50m each. I don't, if we make Griezmann the marquee signing for the summer we are going to fill out the rest of that summer's recruitment with players in 25m to 30m range.I do agree about not shoehorning people in, just for the sake of it. But the money argument is not convincing
The French national team isn't enough of a barameter to not sign somebody. They regularly have class players look poor as Deschamp is tactically inept.
If we did sign Griezmann he could play any of the front 3/4 positions to a high level.
People on this forum are so burnt by Di Maria that they just don't want to sign any class players anymore, really strange.
French people generally settle well into England, he's good friends with Pogba and speaks Spanish too so will fit into the rest of the squad well.
We know he and his brother love's united, he was a fan of Beckham. It's exactly the sort of the signing the club will want to make.
Zlatan won't be here forever, maybe Jose wants another option to rotate with? he could happily play number 9.It has nothing to do with Di Maria and all to do with ripping up the perfect balance that we have right now in the team.
Why not improve on a template that is proving to Work?
You have Mkhi thriving without a #10 getting in his way when drifting inside. You have Zlatan dropping deep helping out with the build-up, without a #10 getting in his way. You have Pogba playing with freedom knowing that 2 players are there in the midfield to share the defensive duties.
I could go on, but you get the point. Our players are more suited to this structure.
Griezmann is no great dribbler or individualist, he thrives on quick inter-play and his own movement, that's why he perform at his best in the middle with lots of passing options, but becomes a much lesser threat when isolated out on the wings. Buying him to play in a front three wouldn't be worth it imo.
In the end, i doubt anyone would cry if we got Griezmann, but the concern with him fitting in is fair and justified.
Herrera is not the team's main creative force Pogba is and will be the one most affected by this signing. Herrera will be relegated to squad player but with that we lose the vital work rate that affords Pogba the freedom to do his thing.
Pogba has the potential to become the best player in the world and Martial the best striker in the world. But with Griezmann and the problems he's going to bring, I'm afraid that it will never happen.
So I don't want Griezmann
The French national team isn't enough of a barameter to not sign somebody. They regularly have class players look poor as Deschamp is tactically inept.