Murder on Zidanes Floor
You'd better not kill Giroud
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 30,478
I have no idea when or who, or even what it truly meansProps to whoever gave you your tagline
I have no idea when or who, or even what it truly meansProps to whoever gave you your tagline
What was the reason two years ago?
This is overreacting to a stupid extent. Today we had three kids up top. Good kids, but they're going through a learning curve year after a breakout season last year. Our most creative attacking players were both on the bench. We do not need a whole new attack.
Martial, Rashford and Ibra. Micky as well if you count him as attackerWhich is our attackers get in Chelsea's team? Tottenham's? City's?
I have no idea when or who, or even what it truly means
Martial, Rashford and Ibra. Micky as well if you count him as attacker
No chance would they get into their team, ibra yes but we won't have him next yearMartial, Rashford and Ibra. Micky as well if you count him as attacker
There's no reason to say Mikhi or Mata couldn't get into Chelsea or Spurs' starting XI. Martial and Rashford might not, but when everyone's fit they barely even get into ours (again, they are just kids who are still developing). And quite frankly, I always feel that comparing one team to another in the way you're describing is a real fallacy, different players are required for different purposes. What I do know is that when Mikhi and Mata start together, we literally look like a different team.Which is our attackers get in Chelsea's team? Tottenham's? City's? Their starting 11 or even the bench.
You could say only Ibra is a candidate. Our attack isn't that good at the moment.
Perhaps Rashford/Martial improve next season and subsequently our attack improves, but I'm not going to pin my hopes on them and I sure hope the club doesn't.
I said they would get into their teams, and they would. Martial and Rashford would both get into the Chelsea team ahead of Pedro, both into the City team ahead of Jesus, Rashford over Sane as well, Martial probably similar level. Both over Son. After last season you would have probably been laughed off claiming that Eriksen is better then Micky by most people in the caf (not me btw), i rate both of them very highly..hard to decide whom to pick, probably on form.They don't. Martial is nowhere near Hazard, isn't as good as Sane (by this season's standards) or Dele Alli/Eriksen. Rashford I agree could do well in those sides, still not better than Kane though. Mkhitryan isn't better than Eriksen, Hazard, Silva or KDB.
Martial hasn't been good this season but I think he was better in his first season than Sané. Sané has had about 2 months of good form (about 10-15 games) and he's turned bad again. That's not taking anything away from Sané put rather putting Martial's perfomances into perspective.They don't. Martial is nowhere near Hazard, isn't as good as Sane (by this season's standards) or Dele Alli/Eriksen. Rashford I agree could do well in those sides, still not better than Kane though. Mkhitryan isn't better than Eriksen, Hazard, Silva or KDB.
Our squad is highly overrated by some on here, it's baffling. Martial was very good this season, bar moments here and there, he's been poor as feck this season. He's shown he can still do it in flashes, just looks like he stops giving a feck the first time it doesn't go his way, look at the Swansea game for an example. Was skinning their FB and the first time it didn't go off his influence on the game waned.
A lot of our squad is talented, but still inexperienced, which plays a big part. Rashford's cross in the Swansea game is an example of that, he dribbled past 2-3(?) Swansea players to the byline and then instead of tapping it low and hard to Martial, he smashed it out of the field.
Props to whoever gave you your tagline
Was me. Thanks.I have no idea when or who, or even what it truly means
Martial hasn't been good this season but I think he was better in his first season than Sané. Sané has had about 2 months of good form (about 10-15 games) and he's turned bad again. That's not taking anything away from Sané put rather putting Martial's perfomances into perspective.
Have to remember, Martial came to use raw, was unleashed on the league and was great. But a whole season of LvG has to drain you a bit and then in comes a manager that wants different things from you so you have to change. He's done that recently and imo is on the up. Would like to see him more up top.
Griezmann would be great for us. I don't think there's a attacker in the club that wouldn't work well with him.
Martial could suit them well. Sterling is a similar player. When they played us midweek we didn't allow them space to run at and they were absolutely useless. A game like that needs a Martial for the team in possession to try and break up the defense. Not that City specifically need an attack player. They are well stacked.Sane suits Pep's style more. Martial's lack of movement wouldn't suit City's style. Sane is constantly making runs off the last defender and attacking space. Martial might be the bigger talent, but who would fit into a squad is completely subjective to that team's needs. Rashford would fit in well though imo, as I've already said.
Agree with the rest, even though I still think Rashford will become a better player and lead our line in the future.
Was me. Thanks.
Pronunciation of Giroud (Jee-roo kinda) fits into the song lyrics so put it as your tagline.
Certainly a whole new attack, and half a midfield.
Acquire me does, and he's better than Ballache anyway.Any actual news regarding this lately? Do people believe he will be a United player next season?
Any actual news regarding this lately? Do people believe he will be a United player next season?
Dembele isn't much different from that. He isn't worth more money then Martial as well. He is a long way off Micky by now. People get deceived way to easy by his fancy tricks, he can't go by 3 players (1 or 2 probably) like Rashford does it.PS: I wish we put in a cheeky 50m bid for Dembele with Martial going the other way. Martial just doesn't seem mentally tough. If he's not able to beat someone in a dribble or misfires a shot, he gets dejected easily. He needs to change that about himself to achieve his full potential.
He will sign for us. After he has signed, people will say that anyone could have said so all along. But tbf it don't look so obvious now
He will sign for us. After he has signed, people will say that anyone could have said so all along. But tbf it don't look so obvious now
I have no idea when or who, or even what it truly means
Dembele isn't much different from that. He isn't worth more money then Martial as well. He is a long way off Micky by now. People get deceived way to easy by his fancy tricks, he can't go by 3 players (1 or 2 probably) like Rashford does it.
Martial is out of form, simple as that. Mourinho clearly didn't help his cause with his comments and manhandling. He'll come back, we all know how good he is. Just look at Hazard from last year, and look at him now.
Dembele is a far better player than Martial will ever be. He's much more talented and as a higher potential. Martial has gone missing quite a few games this season. You're being biased if you say that Rashford is a better dribbler than Dembele. Dembele tore Ligue 1 last season and he's doing in the Bundesliga as well. He's only going to get better. Martial was not worth the crazy amount of money we paid for him. He's good but he's not 60M good. Dembele is worth 40-50M. If you don't agree with me, trying asking the people on the cafe how they rate Dembele in comparison to Martial and Mhiki. By the way, the Mhiki comparison is unfair because Dembele is a dribbler and winger whereas Mhiki is more of a No. 10 who can play on the wings as well.
Dembele isn't much different from that. He isn't worth more money then Martial as well. He is a long way off Micky by now. People get deceived way to easy by his fancy tricks, he can't go by 3 players (1 or 2 probably) like Rashford does it.
.
So what would be best for us? Atletico winning the CL and he can leave with a smile or Atletico going out?
Don't think it matters. He'll either come or not.
So what would be best for us? Atletico winning the CL and he can leave with a smile or Atletico going out?
So what would be best for us? Atletico winning the CL and he can leave with a smile or Atletico going out?
I still feel the impact of his divorce last summer on his form has been grossly underated. I mean we saw experienced pros like Deco and Henry struggle with form due to similar issues to be fair....and Martial is still very young.Mourinho is probably ruing the chance he had to get Gabriel Jesus. The guy makes really good runs and that's instinctive and cannot be taught. That's what Martial and Rashford have been lacking. Jesus has a good judge of where the ball will end up and obviously has the skills to score. For instance, when he came on to play against us, he was so clever to make that run. Yes, he was offside but that could have easily ended up being given since it was so close. Getting Griezmann will undoubtedly lift the team spirit because the guy is considered one of the best strikers in the world apart from the goals he scores. If Griezmann does come, it'll be beneficial for France because whatever formation we use to get the best out of the two will be adopted in the national team and they will develop a better understanding with each other along with Martial obviously.
PS: I wish we put in a cheeky 50m bid for Dembele with Martial going the other way. Martial just doesn't seem mentally tough. If he's not able to beat someone in a dribble or misfires a shot, he gets dejected easily. He needs to change that about himself to achieve his full potential.
Martial's form has suffered this time round is because he's not the focal point of the attack. The other thing is Martial's game is about getting the ball to feet and dribbling his way to score. He lacks the vision to run into spaces. The fact that he's got his number taken away from him definitely has hurt his confidence. He went from being the main man last season to a benchwarmer. I think that's definitely playing on his mind.
They don't. Martial is nowhere near Hazard, isn't as good as Sane (by this season's standards) or Dele Alli/Eriksen. Rashford I agree could do well in those sides, still not better than Kane though. Mkhitryan isn't better than Eriksen, Hazard, Silva or KDB.
Our squad is highly overrated by some on here, it's baffling. Martial was very good this season, bar moments here and there, he's been poor as feck this season. He's shown he can still do it in flashes, just looks like he stops giving a feck the first time it doesn't go his way, look at the Swansea game for an example. Was skinning their FB and the first time it didn't go off his influence on the game waned.
A lot of our squad is talented, but still inexperienced, which plays a big part. Rashford's cross in the Swansea game is an example of that, he dribbled past 2-3(?) Swansea players to the byline and then instead of tapping it low and hard to Martial, he smashed it out of the field.
These things are really annoying to read because they are such bullshit
You are totally compairing players on the basis of the current season completley disregarding everything else they ever accomplished in their career and completley ignoring all other factors that can contribute to having a poor season besides a lack of quality or talent.
Impact of trainer, impact of a system you need to play in, your teammates, and probably a million other things can influence the performance of a player beside his talent. For example Hazard has flourished with Mourinho leaving and playing a completley different system under a different coach, there is alot more to it than just quality. Because one season a player is god on here and the next season he is completley shit. Take Di Maria for example, he was one of the best players of Real madrid, voted player of the CL the season they won it, he came here and it totally didn't work out for him, he moved to PSG and he is suddenly very good again. We simply need to accept we are not a very good team atm for alot of other reasons besides quality and talent. Take the team of 2013 under Fergie, they strolled to the title and many would have said other players would struggle to get into the team and that we have the best squad of the league, place them in the hands of a tool like Moyes and you go from champions to a clueless bunch that finishes outside the top 4.
If you would have said Martial could not get into any of the top PL sides last year after he was our best player and one of the best in the league you would have been publically crucified on here. The kid has the talent to be one of the best in the league an a trainer like Pochettino would be happy to have him and would probably play him every game he could. I think he would also find it easier to develop at a (currently) more stable team like Tottenham. He just had a poor second season under Jose, doesn't mean he suddenly became shit.
Mkhitaryan scored 23 goals and made 32 assists last year at Dortmund in the Bundesliga, you would have to be insane to deny his quality and talent. He obviously struggled this year but it is clear that is not because of a lack of talent. He is a clearly superior player to someone like Eriksen if you compare their careers and stats (not saying Eriksen isn't a good player). A player like Mkhitaryan would make the team for any top PL side.
Ibra as one of the topscorers would probably also make the team at other top PL clubs. And obviously Rashford with his talent would be make it aswell.
Our team is not massively overrated on here, it does however massively underperform.
It's premature to state that now. Enough said.
It's not premature to notice which player is more skilful and productive (AT THE MOMENT).
Dembele is a far better player than Martial will ever be.
Which is our attackers get in Chelsea's team?
Martial, Rashford and Ibra. Micky as well if you count him as attacker
No chance would they get into their team, ibra yes but we won't have him next year
Micky maybe but not on current form