RDCR07
Not a bad guy (Whale Killer)
He finishing and his composure is amazing for his age.
And at the same time you say you're not biased?
Martial's supposed entire season where he was awful.
In a competitive game of football, people tire after 60mins. It's normal.you think swansea got ran ragged?
But you can only play the hand you're dealt. Its not his fault he isn't starting. He was given a chance and he has grabbed it so far with both his fecking hands.As I said in the other thread, don't think he would have done as well had he started. It's no coincidence that literally the whole team started performing much better and looked more comfortable once Swansea moved to a back 4. (Even players who started, who would have been more tired than Martial ala Pogba, Mkhi etc.) There was no space in the middle of the pitch in the first half as they had 5 defenders, Martial would have struggled considering he always cuts in and his movement behind the defence is poor.
It was a great cameo from him and his goal was sublime, but I think people are underestimating the flow of the game when he was brought on.
I'd be happy with either him or Rashford starting, but they both have their strengths and weaknesses and should be used according to the demand of the specific game. They're both also very good options off the bench due to their speed and directness.
Even after Martial got over the number issue shortly after this guy seems so focused on it, he forgot that Martial scored 2 goals in around 35 mins of playing time, and the videos of the teams that shows good spirit and understanding between the guys, and focused on a year old story, stupid post.You added two plus two and got ten.
And at the same time you say you're not biased?
Martial's supposed entire season where he was awful.
You know we are not Stoke or Leicester(without offence) and we can play our own players whenever we please without caring what Barca remember on have in mind?Wonder if Jose is limiting Martial's game time so Barca don't remember how good he is and table a ridiculous offer
Would be interesting if get's some starts after the window closes
Yeah, we are one of very few teams that isn't really threatened by Barca in regards to wages willing to pay. In a lot of cases when Barca goes for a player, it would break the players current wage structure to keep him. Now, we will always be susceptible to Spanish, Portuguese, and South American's chasing their desires there but wages will never be a problem.You know we are not Stoke or Leicester(without offence) and we can play our own players whenever we please without caring what Barca remember on have in mind?
If so that's some ridiculous theory you have there
Nice to hear what Jose thinks of Martial, such a great talent and genuinely loves the club
That would make sense if we were using them both efficiently. As it stands, Martial has played 25 minutes - while Rashford has played over 175 minutes even though Martial had the better preseason. Martial also didn't get to play a minute in the Real Madrid tie even after humiliating Carvajal.
Posters have a right to vent out their frustration because Martial is just not given the same opportunities as other less talented players.
In a competitive game of football, people tire after 60mins. It's normal.
I'm not arguing for Martial to not start, I'm just saying that him being introduced at key stages of both games by Mourinho so far has had an effect in his performance. It has to. He might do as well against an entirely fresh set of opposition defenders, but it remains to be seen. We might find out in our next fixture and hopefully he does.
Could have fooled me last season.It doesn't. He's been here two years, and we've seen it. Many times.
Where you fooled 2015-2016 season?Could have fooled me last season.
No, he was good. But I'm not arguing that he hasn't been good before, or that he won't be good in the future. Just that he more than likely reaps some benefits from being substituted on two thirds of the way though a game. I think that's a reasonable position to take.Where you fooled 2015-2016 season?
I agree. Pros and cons to each position. Either way, it's a good problem to have (Rashford or Martial starting).People are still trying to asterisk his performances. Having an impact as a substitute isn't simple just because the opposing defense may be a bit fatigued or chasing the game. You still have to find your rhythm and your way into a game, which is obviously more difficult in a 20 minute apperance compared to a 60 or 70 minute one. There are pros and cons for either way. Ultimately, Martial has simply played very well, well enough to warrant starting some games, whether that's in the Premier or the Champions League.
I don't think Deschamps rates him. Look at his national team appearances. Had an average half against Albania in the second game of the Euros, then was left on the bench for the rest of the tournament until 110 minutes had passed in the final. Not been called up since October last year which given his performances is understandable but this season he's had a better start than Coman and Giroud and they're opted over him.Deschamps called Coman and Thauvin but not Martial
Deschamps called Coman and Thauvin but not Martial
I don't think Deschamps rates him. Look at his national team appearances. Had an average half against Albania in the second game of the Euros, then was left on the bench for the rest of the tournament until 110 minutes had passed in the final. Not been called up since October last year which given his performances is understandable but this season he's had a better start than Coman and Giroud and they're opted over him.
Thauvin I can understand to an extent as due to Marseille playing in Europa qualifying he's played way more games than the others:
His output has been average though considering the opposition he's faced.
Could it be that Deschamps just really doesn't rate him? Even at the Euros, he was coming off the back of his best ever season and was still a bit part bench player at the Euros. He was also almost never played again in the tournament after his bad performance iirc.
Could it be that Deschamps just really doesn't rate him? Even at the Euros, he was coming off the back of his best ever season and was still a bit part bench player at the Euros. He was also almost never played again in the tournament after his bad performance iirc.
Could it be that Deschamps just really doesn't rate him? Even at the Euros, he was coming off the back of his best ever season and was still a bit part bench player at the Euros. He was also almost never played again in the tournament after his bad performance iirc.