haram
New Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 12,921
Pogba is obviously a big difference but I dont think mkhitaryan or mata offer something more then having both rashford and martial there. Just purely looking at those. Wouldnt it be more balanced by having a very similar threat on both sides of the pitch, and have the fullbacks hold the width and overlap, with the creativity/control of pogba and whoever plays #10 to supply them and lukaku chances? Its what fergie when for a lot of the time and its basically what Pep does now. Barca/bayern/madrid/psg all have very big threats from both sides of the pitch. We basically write off the right side to just Valencia's runs and try to overload the middle with average playmakers and still end up relying on pogba. I dont see how thats better balance. Isnt better in an attacking sense compared to rashford being out there, and defensively who cares, they all do a decent job defensively for wingers anyway.
Mata helps the midfield. Playing Rashford on the right would largely push him to go on the outside, something Valencia does already. You are reducing Rashford's threat and removing Mata who links with the midfield. Not to mention Martial is largely going to cut inside anyway. It makes us predictable, and makes us lighter in midfield.