The United
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2015
- Messages
- 5,949
I am not that bothered. From what I have seen in senior games, he did not show anything special.
I am not that bothered. From what I have seen in senior games, he did not show anything special.
That's my impression and if we get burgeoning talents like Bellingham, I'd be more than happyHe can go if he wants. He is 5’3 and doesn’t possess any other important physical qualities like pace. There is only so much he can do. We wouldn’t be missing much. It would have been nice if we did give him more opportunities though to be fair.
Lingard and Pereira have been poor for a while. There's no indication that anything has changed for him. He was the one that was frozen out. From his perspective, it would make complete sense to leave.
He’ll play more at Chelsea than United because he is good enough
He was given minutes, and was good to average most often played out of position, he wasn't given enough minutes considering we were playing dross like Lingard who looks like a sunday league player. What football resons do this coaching staff see in Lingard and Pereira please enlighten us? They must be blind.
He can go if he wants. He is 5’3 and doesn’t possess any other important physical qualities like pace. There is only so much he can do. We wouldn’t be missing much. It would have been nice if we did give him more opportunities though to be fair.
Let me turn this one the other way around for you:
Considering all the youngters who got chances and secured frequent playing time.
Why didn't Angel Gomes?
Let me turn this one the other way around for you, other than supremely talented, top 3 in the world talent, Mason Greenwood and Brandon Williams (after injury of Shaw and Young being played RB to cover for AWB) who are all this other youngsters who got so much chances? Imo Garner could have played more also.Let me turn this one the other way around for you:
Considering all the youngters who got chances and secured frequent playing time.
Why didn't Angel Gomes?
He's been at the club since he was 6 so I doubt its that. The majority of his life he's been with United
this is a good question give he looked more talented to ChongLet me turn this one the other way around for you:
Considering all the youngters who got chances and secured frequent playing time.
Why didn't Angel Gomes?
Like that Pogba guy didnt? I wonder what happened to him
Let me turn this one the other way around for you, other than supremely talented, top 3 in the world talent, Mason Greenwood and Brandon Williams (after injury of Shaw and Young being played RB to cover for AWB) who are all this other youngsters who got so much chances? Imo Garner could have played more also.
Like that Pogba guy didnt? I wonder what happened to him
Who said ahead of Ziyech. He will play more than at United. Lampard has not been impressed with his AMs this season.Play at Chelsea ahead of the likes of Ziyech. And just like they have already signed Ziyech they will get more first team quality players. He will be at Vitesse come August. If he really wants to leave for first team football I would to see him got to lower teams that would actually give him a chance
Who said ahead of Ziyech. He will play more than at United. Lampard has not been impressed with his AMs this season.
Because McTominay keeps knocking him on his ass during training sessions? This is my question too and I can only think it has to do with something going on during training. He doesn't seem to have a bad attitude, plays well in the U23s, so what are they seeing none of us has access to?My question is: Why isn't Angel Gomes being given playtime when others are?
No one is suggesting he will be a starter. Simply he will play more than at United.Thats not a guarantee. The fact that he was not impressed with his AMs should tell you he is either going to play Ziyech as the 10 or will get an established 10 and play Ziyech at rw. Chances are that Ziyech in that situation would also be seen as the back up 10. He simply couldn't break past Pereira and Lingard yet some how he is going to get to Chelsea and outperform their current AMs
Have you considered that as horrible as they are they were also outperforming him in training too?
No one is suggesting he will be a starter. Simply he will play more than at United.
We have offered him one he’s just not signed it. Either wants more money or more assurances.Why is it so hard for us to just give him a contract with good wages for 4 years and let him pick his loan destination for a year or 2? We won't lose money since we can sell him, it's low risk high reward.
Sometimes attackers attributes make it easier for them to break through than midfielders. Midfielders tend to develop slower or require maturity. These young wonderkids who burst onto the scene tend to be attackers (strikers, wing forwards, wingers etc). Centre Midfield takes a bit of time as their role is very demanding and complex.
you need more than one top attribute to break through into the first team as a young centre midfielder. You can't get by with just an excellent pass for example, or just paceI tend to feel like most young talents that break through seem to have an attribute that is already at the level of a top tier player. For example with Greenwood his finishing ability is clearly at the level of a top level striker and it's about the rest of his attributes catching up with him to make him a well rounded top player.
Cause he's out of contract in two weeks?Why not loan him to a Spanish club for playing time?
I dont think its only about money, and still that would set a very bad presedent. 30K a week for a youngster who's not even nearly stablished in he first team are pretty good wages. We tend to overpay all players, so if we start with youngsters how much would Greenwood ask? Solving all the problems with paying more is a really bad idea.Why is it so hard for us to just give him a contract with good wages for 4 years and let him pick his loan destination for a year or 2? We won't lose money since we can sell him, it's low risk high reward.
It's so lazy to say Gomes is weak because of his size. He has been competing against bigger stronger players for most of his life, while being one of the best players on the pitch for the most part. As well he really knows how to put himself about in winning the ball and shielding the ball when he needs to.I think he lacks the physical profile to play for Manchester United in the coaching staff's eyes. His size has been hanging above him for a long time like a headsman's axe and it's probably why he wants to move elsewhere, because it will hinder him getting chances in this club.
Personally, from what I've seen, he is a very good footballer but his lack of strength really does hinder his dribbling ability which he has in droves.
Considering all the youngters who got chances and secured frequent playing time.
Why didn't Angel Gomes?
It's so lazy to say Gomes is weak because of his size. He has been competing against bigger stronger players for most of his life, while being one of the best players on the pitch for the most part. As well he really knows how to put himself about in winning the ball and shielding the ball when he needs to.
I get that but I'm speaking strictly in the context of where to fit him for playing time, since that's been mentioned quite a lot in this thread.Cause he's out of contract in two weeks?
Well, I don't think the manager and coaches that United have now are ignorant. They see what we all see in the games he plays. Plus, they see him daily in training and I am sure have one on one conversations with him fairly often. It's something in these last two areas that they are seeing that is making them make the choice to not give him as much time as fans thinks he deserves.You think managers are infallible?