You accuse me of cherry picking stats and they you say this:
The eye test and stats tell you the same story, it's just you're drawing the wrong conclusion if you think he was anything more than "average" shostopper. He's around 10th on PSxG for 22/23 season what sounds about right (because "he was a good shot stopper last season until the last two months where he made a couple of horrendous mistakes").
I don't know how "he was good until he made a couple of horrendous mistakes" make things better for De Gea (I've seen this "line of defense" quite a few times on this forum), but that is why you look at the stats that calculate this based on big sample (that's hundreds of shots over the course of the season). In simple terms, he conceded more goals that he "should" statistically. That is far more important than number of times he and the defensive line didn't concede a goal.
Anyway, I think he's a decent shot stopper, and it's not a reason we're letting him go. The main reason is he doesn't offer anything else on acceptable level for us to move forward.
Yeah same players have different stats in different clubs/seasons. But the point is it's easy to prove some theses like "playr X is very good shotstopper/Player Y is very good finisher" because we have stats for that. It was the case with De Gea a few years ago, but not anymore.
Congrats to De Gea on Golden Glove award, that's all I'll say on this topic.