This is a major issue now I think. It was noticeable last night that Onana gave Galatasary massive encouragement with how badly he dealt with the chances they had (including the goal that wasn’t).
I haven’t looked at the stats but it seemed to the naked eye that they were shooting from random angles and distances 2nd half because they felt it was worth a go! You don’t do that against teams with dependable or quality goalies because you’d just be effectively coughing up possession. This guy though, it’s always worth a pop because he looks like he’s always got a rick in him!
The second goal is borderline unforgivable for me but there’s serious question marks against the other two as well. It’s alright being unorthodox if it’s working for you but if your technique is all wrong, you don’t have anything to fall back on. He is to goalkeeping what Lindelof is to being a CB. They just don’t pass the eye test for me. Probably decent players at the right club but not United players.
We needed a big performance from him whereas in actual fact, he’s done us like a kipper. I fear this’ll end up being the story of our season unless we deal with him now…
I think both teams were affected by his actions: we became really nervous and tentative and had that hurried energy to try and prevent anything getting into proximity of shooting range, which of course led to gaps opening up all over the pitch because we lost our shape. They were buoyed by our keeper being on the rocks and had the feeling that any shot could either lead to a direct goal or some kind of spill that they could capitalise off of. As fans, we were aware of the above and a game that was at least 50-50 felt like it was slipping away from us, or was certainly more on a knife-edge than it otherwise would've been.
We all know what kind of shooting onslaught awaits us in upcoming games now because of him too. Every team is going to test flappy hands and see if there's anything in it for them. Speculative shooting can lead to prosperous returns is the message, and it remains to be seen whether that notion is incorrect.
I'm not in the camp of going back and forth with bad keepers unless they are absolutely spectacular at certain aspects of keeping. De Gea himself was absolutely terrible at cross collection and any kind of commotion in the box, not that he got much better as time went by, but at the same time, he was world-leading at shot stopping and that was evident from the outset. The things Onana was vaunted for, we saw for maybe three games and since then, his kicking and distribution has not offered countenance to the calamity we see with his hands. I'm much slower to 'forgive' keepers than most, which is why I was quiet during his recent upturn because I held the thought that this guy hasn't proven beyond any reasonable doubt that he can be trusted, but obviously the more games without disastrous actions, the more that voice in your head can dull, but nope, the guy's back at it. Again. I just don't see how you can trust a keeper like that, and I wonder how long it takes teammates to, also.
We know ten Hag will send him out again, so it's a run of games that are a trial by fire. I've no clue how he'll do in them, but if there's calamity up his sleeve, I don't think I'll bat an eyelid, and that's not the kind of energy you want toward your keeper. Thinking back to how it felt with our best keepers between the sticks, you go into games with that added layer of comfort and confidence that even if your defenders aren't doing so well or the opponent is on you, your keeper might come up golden; what we have now is the polar opposite; games it looks like we're assured to win, this guy can come along and rip the arse out of. It's unsettling. Definitely not an area of the pitch you can afford to have insecurities about.