Pogue Mahone
Closet Gooner.
Such as?
Lack of concentration.
Silly, mis-timed tackles.
Forgetting to track his man.
Sloppy passing.
Lack of pace.
etc.
Still, he's yong and lernin, eh?
Such as?
Lack of concentration.
Silly, mis-timed tackles.
Forgetting to track his man.
Sloppy passing.
Lack of pace.
etc.
Still, he's yong and lernin, eh?
Nah those stats are accurate and reliable, I remember seeing them last season as well.
It's a fact that we are better in terms of goals scored and conceded with him in the team.
Doesn't stop me from thinking our team is more open right through the middle when he plays.
I'm surprised so few opposition fans are impressed by Anderson, he seems the sort of player that can impress fans in an instant with flashes of brilliance and he has done that a number of times.
Are those major, or minor weaknesses?
The first three are one and the same really, and are to do with concentration but is completely related to his age.
Can't say pace is ever a problem for centre mids, Carrick and Scholes are hardly speed demons.
You've missed my point.
I'm sure the stats are accurate and reliable but the fact we have scored more and conceded less with Anderson in the team will be massively influenced by the fact he hasn't played in any of our really tough matches this season (i.e. the games where the team, as a whole, has scored the least and conceded the most goals)
The better stats, with him in the team, will be down to it being easier opposition, rather than one player having a profound effect on the outcome.
But that wasn't the case last season, which is what the majority(possibly all, seeing as I heard that last season) of the stats are based on.
He has played, and excelled, in some tough matches for us.
You said he didn't have any "significant" weaknesses in his game. I would say the first four I listed are fairly significant, for a central midfielder.
Anderson has showed a couple of times this season that he's in fact able to hit the target with a considerable amount of power and accuracy, it's just that when he mishits it, he really, really mishits it.
He wouldn't be taking some of our freekicks if he hadn't showed some kind of ability in the shooting department during training.
I don't know if he'll ever be a goalscoring midfielder, but I'm not willing to rule it out just yet.
Shooting is very much a confidence thing - just look at Fabregas this season compared to the last.
And completely relative to age, by significant I meant things that he may struggled with in the long run.
Like Anderson's shooting. I don't think it's relevant to age I just think it's a weakness in his game.
Absolutely. I don't believe for one minute that Anderson has some sort of fundamental flaw in his game, when it comes to shooting. I've always been confident that his first goal will open up the flood-gates. The fact he remains so willing to tale a crack - despite poor results to date - confirms to me that he's probably scoring for fun in training.
Someone posted some stats that our defensive record is much better when Anderson plays, we've also scored more goals.
Can't remember who posted it or which thread it was in though which is a bit of a shitter.
It's not really close anymore, is it?
Anderson's miles ahead of Lucas, and has made the absence of Paul Scholes (of all people!) manageable. He's an amazingly talented player; the new Essien written all over him.
He's still playing within himself in spite of some his performances this year. I think he's only ever really let himself loose once, and that was when we literally demolished Arsenal. Anderson could probably do with realising that he's stronger and faster than 99% of all the players he's come up against.
Statistics are like mini-skirts, they may give you great ideas but they can hide the most important parts.
Statistics are like lampposts, you can use them for illumination, or you can use it like a drunk, hanging on to them for support
Aye, hasn't been outmuscled by anyone. Needs to realise this and go on some more of those 50 yard runs - I fecking love it when he does that
It's not really close anymore, is it?
Anderson's miles ahead of Lucas, and has made the absence of Paul Scholes (of all people!) manageable. He's an amazingly talented player; the new Essien written all over him.
He's still playing within himself in spite of some his performances this year. I think he's only ever really let himself loose once, and that was when we literally demolished Arsenal. Anderson could probably do with realising that he's stronger and faster than 99% of all the players he's come up against.
Seconded. Lucas was one of those countless overhyped liverpool footballers.
The reasoning behind Lucas being a great player according to Scousers was that he was Brazillian Under 20 Captain and they thought no Brazillian captain could be a bad player
Anderson is a far better player than Lucas but we shouldn't forget Anfield is a bit of a graveyard for young prosperous talent.
No need to leave anymore, we dont have to sell
The boys have grown up together just like your boys in the 90s did.
Johnson will play for England as will Hart, Onuha and Sturridge, Miller will be in the squad, Richards is already nailed on for a future England captain.
Ireland when he grows up will Irelands new Giles
Evans will be Wales new Ian Rush.
And our under 18s is unbeatable
I actually think Lucas is a good player and will continue to improve for them.
I hope I'm there when Anderson scores his first goal.
This might sound mad but I wouldn't bet against a small pitch invasion if it's at an away game.
Dont forget one was 7M the other 2 and a half that.
You tend to get what you pay for.
Would you rather Lucas + £7m, or Anderson? I'd take the latter everytime with the benefit of hindsight. Obviously, there is still time for Lucas to improve, but at this moment in time, there really isn't much of a comparison to be made between the two.
The mistake you're making there is actually engaging with Scholesy in a discussion about up-and-coming young footballers.
This is a bloke who genuinely believes that a number of footballers skills will never improve, once they're past the age of 16 years old. He's a hard-core mentalist.
Crikey, that's a bit Houllier-ish, actually. A point could be made about ability, not skill.
The reasoning behind Lucas being a great player according to Scousers was that he was Brazillian Under 20 Captain and they thought no Brazillian captain could be a bad player
I knew this fecking thread was gonna haunt us. Lucas has been excellent this last month or so. Liverpool didn't miss Alonso at all today, which says it all really.
I knew this fecking thread was gonna haunt us. Lucas has been excellent this last month or so. Liverpool didn't miss Alonso at all today, which says it all really.
I knew this fecking thread was gonna haunt us. Lucas has been excellent this last month or so. Liverpool didn't miss Alonso at all today, which says it all really.