K2K
Full Member
Give him and Fellaini new deals please.
He'll be an expensive bench...Excellent again. He has his role to play in the team whatever as a sub or a bench.
He was good in the CL and good again today after he came on. I reckon he should start against Liverpool, I'm worried about Fellaini against Liverpools press and pace. Fellaini is useful in and around the box but he's not very defensively aware or the quickest to get the ball out of his feet.
Think they will both start in a midfield 3 with Matic. Mourinho will want Herrera's interceptions and lungs plus Fellaini's aerial threat against Liverpool who are damn near the worst defenders of set pieces and crosses in the league.
When it comes to the City game, if José doesn't put him on De Bruyne the way he stuck him on Hazard last season, it'll be a travesty. It's screaming out to be done.
He's Klopps wet dream of a midfielder. Glad he plays for usYep, best through-baller in the team. This from a player who regularly produces league-high tackle and interception stats.
When it comes to the City game, if José doesn't put him on De Bruyne the way he stuck him on Hazard last season, it'll be a travesty. It's screaming out to be done.
He was good in the CL and good again today after he came on. I reckon he should start against Liverpool, I'm worried about Fellaini against Liverpools press and pace. Fellaini is useful in and around the box but he's not very defensively aware or the quickest to get the ball out of his feet.
They do have different threats, but if we cut off the source, they're so much less potent. Everything goes through De Bruyne in that team.Man marking strategy won't work against City due to different attacking threats they have. You can mark KDB, but there will still be Silva, Sane, Sterling.. Etc and we have only one Herrera.
Zonal defense that's the way.
Putting Herrera isn't the same as going man to man all over the pitch. It's essentially making the game a 10 v 10 contest for most parts and given how much of their game flows through De Bruyne, I see it really disrupting their rhythm. Silva is the other guy who runs their game other than de Bruyne. Sane and sterling whilst good, rely on these 2 for service and cutting the de Bruyne channel off will make them think.Man marking strategy won't work against City due to different attacking threats they have. You can mark KDB, but there will still be Silva, Sane, Sterling.. Etc and we have only one Herrera.
Zonal defense that's the way.
Man marking strategy won't work against City due to different attacking threats they have. You can mark KDB, but there will still be Silva, Sane, Sterling.. Etc and we have only one Herrera.
Zonal defense that's the way.
Silva and De Bruyne are basically 2 AM's playing higher up the pitch. We just got to wreck em on the counter
Nah, I disagree. They have a lot of attacking outlets but so did Chelsea last season - they're only a 'one-man team' when they're playing badly. What's significant is that Hazard was clearly the primary threat, the one which your team will pull itself all out of shape trying to combat, thus creating the gaps and weaknesses which their other threats will exploit. Right now, that's what KDB is for City.
The beauty of Herrera as a man-marker is that it doesn't make him any less useful when you're in possession. He's intelligent enough to use that position next to a defensively negligible player as a platform when we turn over possession. Canny enough to shift the ball on but stay in a position to get right back on his target's heels the second possession falls back to the opposition.
But even if man-marking KDB did take Herrera completely out of the game, it would be worth it. That's City's most dangerous player by far in exchange for one who, while brilliant, hasn't even started for us much this season. It's like swapping a Knight for their Queen.
Silva is, but Guardiola has De Bruyne dropping deep a lot too. He's using him to make up for their mediocre central midfielders. Nullify him and you don't just cut their goal-and-assist threat in half, you also seriously harm their ability to get the ball to the other creative players.
Chelsea is a complete different case. They were 100% dependent on Hazard and Pedro through the flanks as the midfield has zero attacking output so man mark the flanks and they're done for. City have different attacking threats from the midfield and flanks it's practically impossible to man mark all of them out of the game. Mark KDB and Silva will still be there create their chances while their flanks are still doing their job. They are hardly a one or 2 man team, unlike Chelsea.
Nope, not last season they weren't. Remember the non-stop supply line of long passes over the top from Fabregas to Costa?
And again, you've completely ignored the point of my post. Yes, City have a variety of threats. But right now KDB is by far the biggest, and trying to defend against him as if he's any other player will pull us all out of shape and create gaps for those other players to exploit. Better to 'sacrifice' Herrera marking him right out of the game (although as I also said in the post you're answering, Herrera doesn't necessarily have to drop out of the game to man-mark) and let everyone else cope with the now more manageable threat offered by Silver and Sané.
Fabregas wasn't even a consistent starter in their line up ? 90 % of their matches they were playing with Kante and Matic and their strategy was to get the balls to the flanks to do the attacking job, so crowd the flanks with players and mark Hazard/Pedro out of the team and they're done for.
I agree that KDB is their most important threat, that it's important to stop him and I wasn't saying to not trying to put Herrera on him to nullify him. What I was saying is they have the tools to get past this. It'll decrease their threat, for sure but they have other playmakers to keep creating chances and you can't man mark all of them. You're decreasing their thread but you're not 100% nullifying them, not like we did against Chelsea. I think that it's clear.
This is chock full of long Fabregas passes to Costa. Also if I remember rightly Luiz was doing it all season too.
I agree Hazard was more of a dominant outlet for Chelsea last season than KDB is for City right now, although I think you overestimate how much - Hazard wasn't so all-important last season, and KDB is, in this moment right now, very central to how City are playing. Silva, Sané et al are very dangerous but right now it's KDB who's enabling it all, which is why I think it's worth man marking him.
They'll be looking to repeat what they did against Chelsea as closely as possible, so neutralising the central cog in that strategy is the best way to throw them off their game. It's not just about weighing up the threats mathematically, it's about fecking with their game plan, and KDB's recent primacy has put him slap bang in the middle of that game plan.
And you've also got to ask yourself if it's worth the swap. Herrera for KDB. Right now, there's no question, especially since as aforementioned Herrera will still be able to do good things when we've got the ball.
Again, I don't know why you're thinking I don't want to put Herrera on KDB and nullify him. What I'm pointing is they're not a one man team like Chelsea was last season. Their threat will decrease, but it won't stop. We can man mark KDB, but we still should put a plan to stop their other attackers.
I'm not, I hear what you're saying. I just don't know how you could think I was suggesting we wouldn't 'put a plan to stop their other attackers'. I mean, when I said Herrera should man mark KDB I sort of took it as read that we'd also have ten other players on the pitch doing their jobs too...
Ander > Pogba for me, far better tactical asset and useful skillset in a 4-2-3-1.
With the solid base of him and Matic, I'd be compelled to play Rashford right, Martial left either side of Lukaku.
Fletcher > Pogba.
Dembele vs Pogba, the most underrated midfielder in the league against the most overrated. In a midfield 2, Dembele is masterful; Pogba is an awol shambles.
If Pogba was anywhere near as good as you're implying, he wouldn't be at United; he'd have been snapped up by one of the other clubs Raiola inevitably pimped him to last summer.
Who would Pogba replace? Wanyama? Better anchor. Dembele? No, better at dominating midfields and keeping the ball ticking over. Eriksen? No, the most productive attacking midfielder in England, alongside De Bruyne.
Pocchettino wouldn't choose Pogba ahead of those three, nor would Ferguson; LVG apparently didn't want him, Zidane didn't, and I sense Mourinho shoehorns him into the team on a compromise. He's not a 10, nor an 8; he's a pragmatists nightmare, but he sells shirts and emojis, and makes United fans think they're an elite team again rather than just an elite club, so Woodward loves him.
Beyond that, Harry Winks will develop into a better possession footballer in the Modric-Kroos mould, and i genuinely believe Ross Barkley has the tools to be a better box to box midfielder than him under Pocch next season; he took the universally ridiculed Kyle Walker and Danny Rose and converted them in £50m fullbacks, and he has more to work with in Barkley.
For what it's worth, I feel Levy made a mistake rejecting circa £50m for Dier; he could have reinvested that into an upgrade defender plus more quality depth elsewhere.
Jesus wept
Didn't know Souness had an account on here.
Fecking incredible @AP88 did Pogba feck your sister?
Ander > Pogba for me, far better tactical asset and useful skillset in a 4-2-3-1.
With the solid base of him and Matic, I'd be compelled to play Rashford right, Martial left either side of Lukaku.