LawCharltonBest
Enjoys watching porn..with foxes
Thanks.It did indeed. Would be announced today but he'd join in Jan because of work permit issues.
Thanks.It did indeed. Would be announced today but he'd join in Jan because of work permit issues.
So Sancho was 40m Euros?Can't afford €10m more for Sancho but can pay €30m + add ons for this guy
Can't afford €10m more for Sancho but can pay €30m + add ons for this guy
We paid 17m in 2003 for unknown and unproven kid. Remember?There must be something shady going on behind the scenes with these crazy amounts for unknown and unproven talent. Like some sort of money laundering for tax-free private accounts....
If he was English then he'd probably be worth same as Sancho in 6 months from now, so it's a no-brainer. Seems like a wise piece of business.
Is he a professional football player before he's had actual professional football experience? Thats my point. He may or may not be good enough. Spending 30m on an 18 year old with no exposure in a first team is basically like you're expecting him to be Messi or Ronaldo levels. We spend all window penny pinching... and then spend 30m on him. I'm sorry but its beyond ridiculous. I hope he is a genuine world class prospect and makes it, but the amount of unknowns involved in young players is way too much to make this smart in any way. Look at Januzaj. World class prospect, PSG bid 25m or so half a year into his first season with us. After he showed it in the premier league. Look at where he is now. Look at how much Erling Haaland went for. Bellingham. Ferran Torres. All cheaper than Amad Traore, far more proven and I'd be shocked if he proved himself to be on par as a prospect.You cannot comment or criticise if, by admission, you know feck all about the player in question.
It is not ludicrous to spend 30m on a professional football player. The only factor that determines whether it is or not, is WHICH footballer, and how good he is. And that key part, you don’t know. Perhaps the people who actually spent the money, have a better idea?
If we had the right people negotiating the deals, this wouldn't have been a problem. If we'd have signed Sancho, we wouldn't have needed both Traore and Pellistri, let's not forget Sancho is 20 himself.But if we had invested the 120m in Sancho, how much would be left for the rest? Except for Cavani, i dont think we would have done Telles, Traore and Pellistri. Ok maybe Traore wasnt needed then, but Telles and Pellistri might turn out useful players
1m 73 or 5’ 8. Not that tiny either
He's a colossus compared to Pulisic, he's a little dwarf.1m 73 or 5’ 8. Not that tiny either
12.5m, different time but for someone who had 33 appearances for Sporting and had just tore up our team in a friendly. Id say its drastically different.We paid 17m in 2003 for unknown and unproven kid. Remember?
He's looks almost a spit of Marcus Edwards, also referred to as 'Messi'.
We were linked with Amad to come in as well as Sancho a few times.This is it isn’t it, we’ve given up so we got this dude and that other one were signing.
Not when the window shuts in less than 10 hours.Its amazing how much Serie A has fallen. From packed to the rim stadiums watching the likes of Platini, Gullit and Zidane and now having current day Serie A professionals playing next to parking lots.
Surely as desperate Atalanta are for money we could have got him for cheaper?
No, our last Sancho bid was €95m + €15m in addons, €10m short of Dortmunds valuation. But we don't want to pay the extra €10m for our top target, we'll pay €30m + add ons for this kid though.So Sancho was 40m Euros?
Juve signed Chiesa for €50m basically spread into €2m first year, €8m second year and €40m last year. Italian clubs are strapped for money. We pay about €15m less for player who hasn't done a fraction of what Chiesa's done.
The Sancho deal that we knew had an expired deadline weeks ago.Perhaps sancho money freed up for this deal.
So he's a lot cheaper. What's the argument.No, our last Sancho bid was €95m + €15m in addons, €10m short of Dortmunds valuation. But we don't want to pay the extra €10m for our top target, we'll pay €30m + add ons for this kid though.
Still what is the issue here? He looks supremely talented. Why link this with Sancho?12.5m, different time but for someone who had 33 appearances for Sporting and had just tore up our team in a friendly. Id say its drastically different.
No, our last Sancho bid was €95m + €15m in addons, €10m short of Dortmunds valuation. But we don't want to pay the extra €10m for our top target, we'll pay €30m + add ons for this kid though.
How exciting again ?Oh come on.
18 year old exciting transfer for £25m is pretty exciting.
We wanted to sign him but he was going to Parma. That deal fell through. Not sure what happened
If we can get 3 players in for the same outlay it does make sense.No, our last Sancho bid was €95m + €15m in addons, €10m short of Dortmunds valuation. But we don't want to pay the extra €10m for our top target, we'll pay €30m + add ons for this kid though.
What's with the sudden explosion of Traorés in top level football? I swear every team seems to have one. A decade ago every team had to have its own Diarra, now Traoré's all the rage.
Is he a professional football player before he's had actual professional football experience? Thats my point. He may or may not be good enough. Spending 30m on an 18 year old with no exposure in a first team is basically like you're expecting him to be Messi or Ronaldo levels. We spend all window penny pinching... and then spend 30m on him. I'm sorry but its beyond ridiculous. I hope he is a genuine world class prospect and makes it, but the amount of unknowns involved in young players is way too much to make this smart in any way. Look at Januzaj. World class prospect, PSG bid 25m or so half a year into his first season with us. After he showed it in the premier league. Look at where he is now. Look at how much Erling Haaland went for. Bellingham. Ferran Torres. All cheaper than Amad Traore, far more proven and I'd be shocked if he proved himself to be on par as a prospect.
Well it puts paid to the belief that young talents don’t want to join us.This poor bastard.
Imagine his first day at United training. Coming from a well defined, hard working, regimented and defined system at Atlanta, to us where half the lads are racing each other on office chairs powere by fire extinguishers and the other half watching the TikTok United dab contest unfold while Ole sits in the shower, fully clothed, crying and shaking, saying the word "Rashy" over and over.
How exciting again ?
He got 24 minutes last season, so I wouldn't hold my breath on much game time.Never heard of him but I’m excited about it.
if we aren’t getting him till January I hope Atlanta give him some game time in serie A
Then the Starks followed the TargaryensThe Dembele's came in between the Diarra's and the Traore's too.
But can they do it on a cold rainy night in Stoke?If he was English then he'd probably be worth same as Sancho in 6 months from now, so it's a no-brainer. Seems like a wise piece of business.
So what do you know about this player to declare that Atalanta are partying right now?!Atalanta are probably partying right now.
Probably not. He looks to be a carbon copy of Marcus Edwards who is English and supremely gifted himself but wouldn't cost £30m now.
The gamble is so little evidence of producing that quality at senior level because talent is only 25% of the equation. It's a very high fee no matter however you look at it.
Its amazing how much Serie A has fallen. From packed to the rim stadiums watching the likes of Platini, Gullit and Zidane and now having current day Serie A professionals playing next to parking lots.
Surely as desperate Atalanta are for money we could have got him for cheaper?
That's quite simplistic view unless you have the complete information about the payment structure of the deal . Traore deal most probably is spread over 3-4 year payment term like most transfer's are so we might be paying 7.5-10 m upfront, but through out the summer It seems Dortmund insisted upon big chunk of Sancho's fee upfront and we have been trying to get them them to agree to payment structure which is comfortable for us as well it seems we have failed in that and now pursuing other targets for the time being.No, our last Sancho bid was €95m + €15m in addons, €10m short of Dortmunds valuation. But we don't want to pay the extra €10m for our top target, we'll pay €30m + add ons for this kid though.
He's a colossus compared to Pulisic, he's a little dwarf.