Mainoldo
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Messages
- 22,965
can’t believe he brought on shoretire! Fuming over here.
Me neither. I instantly started laughing.
can’t believe he brought on shoretire! Fuming over here.
Me neither. I instantly started laughing.
Yep you’d be pretty shocked if ole can’t trust him against a 30+ Monreal.Will start midweek, pretty sure.
The outcome of that matchup could make it to pornhubYep you’d be pretty shocked if ole can’t trust him against a 30+ Monreal.
I’m expecting another Dan James start for oles golden childThe outcome of that matchup could make it to pornhub
Could someone explain this to me?
Why wouldn't you try him
I know what he means, but why? Why wouldn't you start him and see what you have?He could mean that they won't both start.
If he's going to piss about with Amad on the bench at the very least bring him on early in the 2nd half so he gets some significant minutes.
Could someone explain this to me?
Why wouldn't you try him
If you can't play him now when do you?Because if they get an early goal (or two) he could be part of a historic collapse. Which would be the worst possible debut. Much more sense to stick him on the bench and bring him on if we get a goal or two instead.
Very few decisions the manager makes seem logical to be honest.I know what he means, but why? Why wouldn't you start him and see what you have?
There's obviously a logical reason I'm not seeing
If there's a historic collapse it won't have much to do with an 18 year old wonder kid playing in the team's weakest position. There won't be many better chances this season to start him, we need a right winger asap so the sooner he gets used to first team football the better.Because if they get an early goal (or two) he could be part of a historic collapse. Which would be the worst possible debut. Much more sense to stick him on the bench and bring him on if we get a goal or two instead.
This, plus the way the quote is written (possibly different spoken as always) suggests Ole is talking about Shola AND Amad starting. Maybe one will, though it’s probably unlikely for the reasons you say.Because if they get an early goal (or two) he could be part of a historic collapse. Which would be the worst possible debut. Much more sense to stick him on the bench and bring him on if we get a goal or two instead.
If you can't play him now when do you?
Could someone explain this to me?
Why wouldn't you try him
Our back four picks itself. Awb bailly maguire telles. That's a good back four.You can play him now. You just can’t start him. Which is standard for someone so young/new to the league.
That’s certainly the cowardly approach to the game. This sounds like something Jose would say/do. You can do both, approach the game professionally, and play a potential wonder kid too.Because we're still playing against a dangerous European side. Playing kids from the start is risky - if we did that and an encouraged Sociedad score 2 in the first half, it could become a really nervy night.
My view would be that we approach the game professionally with experienced players, we don't lose the first half, and bring Amad in then with the benefit of a 4 goal cushion for 45 mins
Our back four picks itself. Awb bailly maguire telles. That's a good back four.
You could go fred/matic in midfield, greenwood diallo rashford and someone else.
Sociedad are 80/1 to win by 4 goals or more, it's very unlikely to become a nervy night regardless of who starts in utd's weakest position.Because we're still playing against a dangerous European side. Playing kids from the start is risky - if we did that and an encouraged Sociedad score 2 in the first half, it could become a really nervy night.
My view would be that we approach the game professionally with experienced players, we don't lose the first half, and bring Amad in then with the benefit of a 4 goal cushion for 45 mins
So we spent 37m on a player for our weakest position but he's not good/trusted enough to start at home to a team we have a 4 goal advantage over ?Because if they get an early goal (or two) he could be part of a historic collapse. Which would be the worst possible debut. Much more sense to stick him on the bench and bring him on if we get a goal or two instead.
Sociedad are 80/1 to win by 4 goals or more, it's very unlikely to become a nervy night regardless of who starts in utd's weakest position.
Yeah it’s hard to argue.Because we're still playing against a dangerous European side. Playing kids from the start is risky - if we did that and an encouraged Sociedad score 2 in the first half, it could become a really nervy night.
My view would be that we approach the game professionally with experienced players, we don't lose the first half, and bring Amad in then with the benefit of a 4 goal cushion for 45 mins
So we spent 37m on a player for our weakest position but he's not good/trusted enough to start at home to a team we have a 4 goal advantage over ?
If so, we have the worst player recruitment in the world and everyone involved in the deal should be sacked.
The outcome of that matchup could make it to pornhub
No, Not really just being genuine. If as Ole just said starting Diallo in a game that we're already up 4-0 wouldn't be fair on him, why on earth did we spend 37 million on him ?Or maybe, just maybe, you’re being melodramatic?
They’re 80/1 to win. What are the odds against them scoring twice? Or getting an early goal? Because we can have a nervy night and still win.
What a load of crap, we can play 10 other first teamers and use a young winger. Their LB is nacho monreal, he’s hardly big strong and quick. Amad will deal with him fine, it’s just ole being overly cautious as usual.Because we're still playing against a dangerous European side. Playing kids from the start is risky - if we did that and an encouraged Sociedad score 2 in the first half, it could become a really nervy night.
My view would be that we approach the game professionally with experienced players, we don't lose the first half, and bring Amad in then with the benefit of a 4 goal cushion for 45 mins