Norris
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2015
- Messages
- 7,401
6/11
0/1 in the 1st over if we are using DRS.
Btw, Donald at 8 ?
6/11
0/1 in the 1st over if we are using DRS.
I call a fix!
Nice.very good.
Are we doing 11 or 12 players?
Can you reveal the grounds?
Thanks buddy...lucky no one else got him.
Yea, his record is amazing.That's quite strange, he should have gone much earlier.
Mitchell Johnson actually had a really up and down career for a long time, there is one fast bowler left imo who has a better record than him
Top pick.
Could the 12th round be without the minimum matches criteria?
Make it something like that player must have played less than 50 matches or something or must have played for an associate country.
Whoever did this deserves a spanking!5. Boom Boom
Boom Boom Afridi?Whoever did this deserves a spanking!
Real names, ffs.
The reason why Shakib isn't really rated that highly is because his batting and bowling average is greatly helped by the fact that he's played 1/3 of his matches against associate teams.
Here is his record against test playing nations.
and here's Watson record against test playing nations.
Whoever did this deserves a spanking!
Real names, ffs.
This has really slowed down to a crawling pace.
Whoever did this deserves a spanking!
Real names, ffs.
And those players were replaced at some point because some such as myself were uncomfortable with the idea of legends like them not having represented internationally. It's upto @Skills to decide. Anything seems fine.In the sheep draft we had open criteria for one of the rounds where basically any test cricketer could be selected. There were even a couple of guys selected with less than 10 tests. This is no different. It didn't defeat the purpose then, it won't now either.