Norris
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2015
- Messages
- 7,401
Don't rate streak all that much with the bat. But the rest is ace!Fireworks at the end of the innings in our games. Yuvi, Roy, Streak and Mark!
Don't rate streak all that much with the bat. But the rest is ace!Fireworks at the end of the innings in our games. Yuvi, Roy, Streak and Mark!
Like to know who are those, pm me pls.Though we had picked ours.There are much better keeper batsmen left
Jadeja? Shit player, I'm sorry. Has lost so many games for India. Ruined my childhood
The original question asked was that why shouldn't Shakib be considered as equal to Watson which I replied. Anybody who has watched them play will realise who's the better player between the two.
Also what's the criteria for decent test playing nations. Even if remove Bangladesh, Watson's bowling average is 33.5 which is not much different from Shakib who's considered a lead bowler for Bangladesh. Shakib's stats are further increased by the fact that he plays on the slow Bangladesh wickets which help Spinners more than usual. Take his record away from home against test playing nations and you get a record of a mediocre player. 21 batting average and 36 bowling average.
kumble and vettori under the same queries gives you more or less the same bowling average too (kumble's worse actually). Most spinners thrive at home. And in spin assisted pitches, he is a good threat just like kumble and vettori would be.
You haven't changed a bit.There are much better keeper batsmen left
Jadeja? Shit player, I'm sorry. Has lost so many games for India. Ruined my childhood
That Waqar tonking tho
People have made this a statsguru draft
Shock as people uses stats to determine who's the better player
Jadeja? Shit player, I'm sorry. Has lost so many games for India. Ruined my childhood
Who does the voting? Anyone that browses the thread?The problem is that the people who are voting won't be using statsguru to compare the players, most of the voting is based on what people have seen on the cricket pitch and what they rightly or wrongly believe in their own mind. Saeed Ajmal can have a better record in some aspects than Saqlain but that won't matter when it comes to voting.
This is why we picked our Indians early. 16x2 players is a bit tough on that pool.
Best fielder after Azar on those day and along with one of those unpicked player we had decent LMO.Their running between wkts was good.Not the best batsmen but at this stage yes he's good pick.
Sarwan iis not a good pick IMO, but that's just me. I usse the eye test more than stats
Who does the voting? Anyone that browses the thread?
Infact we are regretting not picked one much earlier.Aldo said:This is why we picked our Indians early. 16x2 players is a bit tough on that pool.
What about, for example,Yes anyone from Caf can vote
Your own vote or your assistant's vote doesn't count in your own game.What about, for example,
a team with 2 managers vs a team with one manager....the team with 2 automatically has 1 extra vote?
Got it, ta.
Calling it a night lads. Who should I send my pick to?
Send it to me.Calling it a night lads. Who should I send my pick to?
If @Skills and most of you guys are ok with it, before @VP selects his guy, then I'd like to change. But if most of you / Skills don't want it, that's fine too.We've had a few fiascos because of this and the accepted norm at the moment is - you post a name, you stick with it. Of course skills is the gaffer here.
Sorry to be pain - but we'll stick with Sarwan in the interest of fairness (sorry!).G'warn then, quick.
One off exception though. No changing picks from now, no fecking up by picking more than 2 of the same nationality too please.