KM
I’m afraid I just blue myself
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 49,910
Cheers lads. The rest looks good then?
Cheers lads. The rest looks good then?
I've pm'd Brwned so all ready to go KM. Best of luck for tomorrow.
Cheers lads. The rest looks good then?
Looks good, except that Popluhar might not be very popular.
Well it's all about votes at the moment so the fact many of my players didn't make it proves little. Here's the split in any case
How does it look?
By all means, you had some good players there who haven't been picked largely due to the nationality rule and should be in the quarterfinal (Rivaldo and Kohler). But all I kept pointing out was that the fact you had more high profile star players didn't necessarily make your team better overall.
I certainly needed to point out how much of a gap there is between Demyanenko and Facchetti, Rijkaard in a two and Davids all alone, etc. Otherwise I was just a sitting duck really because what immediately jumped at anyone was Platini-Rivaldo-Xavi.
There was s big deal made out of the whole Nordahl thing when in fact everything I said is true. Erico is by all accounts a more exceptional talent, which I was never going to be able to prove, so the least I could do was compare both of them relative to someone known and the comparison was fair and square bar a somewhat excessive but factually correct "poor man's" description. Was Nordahl the right player for your side ahead of Erico? Quite probably. Is he a bad player? Never said that.
Don't know where the whole "swathes of one-sided bias" comes from, other than a few random digs at Franklin who, to this day, I have no idea whether he would be good enough to face a tricky and dynamic modern frontline.
Nedved was an all action player. Don't think work rate will be a problem with him.
anto - you get votes by just overwhelming the opponent with 100000s of posts. Big ones too. Its a valid tactic, but I can see why other players get pissed off..
Btw, thanks for PM'ing next person and I haven't got better - they sent me back to the hotel frmo work. At least I'm not in the office though!
How does it look?
Nedved was an all action player. Don't think work rate will be a problem with him.
Go with Davids ahead of Seedorf mate. You are playing against Zidane, who better to be at it than someone who knows all about him?
No one will have a clue who Voronin is. I still wonder if that quip on paceme playing Andrei Voronin and Maynor Figueroa didn't have an element of truth in it.
You can pick Matthaus after if you go through so having prioritised your attack ain't too shabby.
Popluhar must be one to replace soon, indeed.
I personally wouldn't swap Breitner. He was right-footed and as far as I remember much of his midfield play was on the right. I feel that right flank may be better off with him. I haven't seen thisistheone's setup though and that may indicate the opposite.
The one thing that doesn't sit well with me at all is Boszik up there. He wasn't an AM, he is playing Hidegkuti's role when he in fact was a deep-lying playmaker. Hungary played 4-1-1-4 (yes, I know , where's the midfield?) with him spraying balls from deep and Hidegkuti in the hole. I would review that midfield setup if I were you.
Which is why I reckon on paper Breitner should be on the right. I would review the midfield. TBH, it looks to me like Sammer holding, Boszik with Breitner and nedved either side and Ronaldo and Messi upfront. Not what you want but what would best suit them. Or maybe flat-3 in the middle with Nedved linking.
Dunno, you will have the width question asked in either of those, but Bozsik simply didn't play where you have him.
Not convinced Nedved's much use playing as high up as Messi.
Maybe play Sammer as a sweeper behind a midfield 3 of Nedved - Bozsik - Breitner?
Messi and Ronaldo can play 1-2s until they end up in front of the goalkeeper anyway. Doesn't really matter where they get the ball? And Nedved and Breitner will provide some width if necessary.
I said that; it was obviously a joke as they were awful 1st and 3rd picks. For what was available and how much longer both or either would've lasted, selection wise, it was a crazy move. So it proved.
How does it look?
I know, that's what I meant by "quip", but I wouldn't be surprised if some people actually thought Maynor Figueroa was on the pitch due to nationality rules or whatnot
We'll see. I would be quite keen on him, but need to see how he fares. No one questioned paceme saying he had the best CB pair. But then, maybe they didn't care.
Maybe play Sammer as a sweeper behind a midfield 3 of Nedved - Bozsik - Breitner?
Messi and Ronaldo can play 1-2s until they end up in front of the goalkeeper anyway. Doesn't really matter where they get the ball? And Nedved and Breitner will provide some width if necessary.
Do you think it's ok to play a sweeper when there's a better one playing at CB?
Do you think it's ok to play a sweeper when there's a better one playing at CB?
Can we ease off with all the advice for KM. I'm suppose to be playing him, not all the manager's in the draft. He should pick his own team like the one he posted
Yeah, fair point. But someone has to play centerback after all and afaik Scirea is way better in that position than Sammer.
I questioned it in my casting vote. I didn't even think he had the best defence in his own match-up!
Would you be fine swapping with Brwned/Cutch for Thursday? Most likely a late start.
PS: clear your inbox!!!!
No, it was actually a genuine enquiry. I thought about playing Shesternyov as sweeper with Beckenbauer in midfield but opted out thinking that people will want to know why Beckenbauer isn't doing it and that they may get in each others way etc.
That is fine.
His CB pair was immense, but he kept saying he had the best defence, which was an own goal really.
His CB pair was immense, but he kept saying he had the best defence, which was an own goal really.
Which is the last thing you want from any defence.
Was said twice.