Fergus' son
Gets very easily confused
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2011
- Messages
- 11,161
How am i lookin folks?
It's all out attack on that left wing!
How am i lookin folks?
It's all out attack on that left wing!
How am i lookin folks?
Zanetti would look good there
I wasn't totally convinced on Tigana-Edwards though, and as you say Redondo fits like a glove. Would have loved Zanetti but. Couldn't work out which order to take Zanetti/Figo before it came back round. Decided that Stobzilla would be more likely to take Figo than you were Zanetti. Ah well
Well, the problem is, if you only look at the big games, you get a different impression. For this draft it probably shouldn't be taken into account, but it was one of the reasons why he moved to that libero position.
Bayern in the seventies was frustrating very often. It's mind blowing that Gladbach won more league titles than Bayern with Beckenbauer in 13 years. In 74/75 and 75/76 Bayern finished 10th and 3rd in the league while winning the champions league (I don't know how it was called in english back then). Beckenbauer himself stated often, he didn't care about league games in those years, he was only able to motivate himself for big games. Of course it's explainable by winning everything between 72 and 74, but still it shows how wasteful he could be if he wasn't interested. Similar problems showed after 66. Bayern really struggled in 67 in the league while winning the cup winner's cup in europe, for example. So they found a way for him to have fun and play to his strenth at the same time while others did the dirty work. Bayern started to perform consistently the moment Beckenbauer moved into his new position in 68/69, winning the first league title in the Bundesliga and finishing top2 every season until 74/75.
Your example for his arrogance points into a similar direction, it was even worse in normal games. In no way would he do a similar job to that man-marking of Charlton during his prime, let's say between 70 and 76.
On a more serious note. It's looking good. The two CMs will have their work cut out, but it's an excellent pair.
The two wingers won't contribute much of a shift but I like the fact you dropped them deeper rather than strand them up there. Asking Redondo ad Edwards to hold the fort AND put some glory balls for some chaps lazying it upfront was too much to ask. Holding the fort and those two being close by to start the transition will work much better.
If we're saying Matthäus is the typical German footballer and Netzer is the least typical then Beckenbauer fits comfortably in between there. He's got more in common with the fierce competitor that Matthäus was than the free-spirited Netzer, IMO. Certainly the freedom that Beckenbauer and Netzer played with in the early 70s is entirely untypical of Germany which is partly why it only lasted for a couple of years and why it's never been repeated since. That side was not far off totaalvoetbal in my view. He showed he had that steely presence to go along with that though - in fact some might say he added the steely presence to Germany that was perhaps found lacking in Cruyff and Holland.
Edit: i better leave this for the match thread
Anyone else think Best was better on the right and Figo on the left? You can obviously play them on either side to create certain partnerships so it makes perfect sense to swap them, just asking as a general question.
Anyone else think Best was better on the right and Figo on the left? You can obviously play them on either side to create certain partnerships so it makes perfect sense to swap them, just asking as a general question.
Agreed. Both Bayern/Germany and Ajax/Netherlands were at the heart of turning the game on its head. I've always held the opinion the main difference was that at the heart of it all, the Dutch genius was a "forward" and the German genius a "defender", and that in that final steel and organisation prevailed over creativity and flair. A preview to the much more poignant and extreme example in 1982.
Of course, you can only get a superficial view of a player's greatness from watching them exclusively in World Cups and European Cups and that's why we all value those with first-knowledge of it all in one form or another, but ultimately that superficial view is all you're looking for in a draft like this.
The semi-final v Russia in '66 was one of the dirtiest finals I've seen and he relished the battle as his fierce competitiveness kicked in. I've no doubt granting him the freedom to stroll around as he pleased helped elevate his game but he showed in that game and countless others he wasn't averse to doing the dirty work when he needed to. And even then as the youngest player on the pitch at 20 years old he looked the best player on the pitch as Seeler was marked out of the game by Voronin. He was nearly half the age of Yashin when he struck that ball past him, and other than that Yashin had another typically flawless game. Man for the big occasion and that's what this is.
If we're saying Matthäus is the typical German footballer and Netzer is the least typical then Beckenbauer fits comfortably in between there. He's got more in common with the fierce competitor that Matthäus was than the free-spirited Netzer, IMO. Certainly the freedom that Beckenbauer and Netzer played with in the early 70s is entirely untypical of Germany which is partly why it only lasted for a couple of years and why it's never been repeated since. That side was not far off totaalvoetbal in my view. He showed he had that steely presence to go along with that though - in fact some might say he added the steely presence to Germany that was perhaps found lacking in Cruyff and Holland.
I think arrogance played a huge part in that final. It was all about humiliating the germans for Cruyff and his team after the first goal, not just about winning in style, which helped bringing the best out of a great german team and somehow took away the effectiveness of that dutch team. I don't think it's comparable to Brazil and France in 82. Cruyff knew how to win, he just forgot it for about 45 minutes and Germany took advantage in that first half.
will ick now
How fitting if my game does end up tomorrow, and Big Dunc lining up in my all star team, 55 years to the day after Munich!
Arrogance/hubris is a nasty thing. World Cup history is peppered with spectacular downfalls resulting from it: Brazil in 1950, Hungary in 1954 (more like over confidence), Netherlands 1974 and arguably France 2006. Netherlands 1978 wasn't far off either, the Argies made a good job of getting under their skins.
Ah okay, yes, that's probably true, especially along with the german mentality.It's more a case that a creative man like Cruyff will have a much greater tendency to lose the plot than a natural organiser and cool calculating mind like Beckenbauer.
Good stuff, Balu.
I am surprised you haven't mentioned Szymaniak not being picked in the draft.
Varela
im sick and at work sorry
Ah, we could fight about that game for years. That german team in 54 is unbelievable underappreciated and there's so much more to it than overconfidence by Hungary.
Start with Fritz Walter. My grandad raved about him when telling me about the '54 World Cup Final (he was there) but I was too upset about our loss to Hungary to even care.Kuzorra and Szepan deserve being mentioned as well for bringing one-touch football to germany in the late twenties which lead to Schalke winning the german championship 6 times in 10 years.
Can you believe at 2-2 and before ET Schiaffino placed a ball past the oncoming keeper and it was so muddy it lost its momentum and stopped bang on the goal-line? fecking ancient balls, that would never happen with a Jabulani.
"The balls you used to head in those days were nothing like the ones today. The balls today don't absorb water, they stay the same shape throughout the whole game. In those days, a keeper often had difficulty punting the ball out of his own half of the field because it was so big and heavy. On a really wet day, the ball got heavier by the minute. If you headed it wrong, you sort of stood there groggy for five or six minutes before you recovered.
Can you believe at 2-2 and before ET Schiaffino placed a ball past the oncoming keeper and it was so muddy it lost its momentum and stopped bang on the goal-line? fecking ancient balls, that would never happen with a Jabulani.
Shit, Was banking on Varela or Redondo making it back round...
Happy with my front four of Platini, Ronaldinho, Ronaldo and Puskas but wanted a defensive midfielder in behind them (now Makelele is ruled out), guess my other option is Davids, which would mean Seedorf to the bench (didn't get the best reception out of the voters anyway) who would be partnered with Yaya Toure. Thoughts?
Can't say I like it to be honest, two box to box midfielders flanked by two of the least defensively minded wingers in the draft.
I'd go with Voronin, unbelievable sense of positioning that neither David's or Toure have.
On that note:
Makes you wonder how much joy the likes of Eusébio, Puskás and Charlton would have with the balls today.
Yeah, I remember that, but I have only seen highlights of that game. Though the mud probably helped your team the same way the weather helped Germany in the final? There's a reason why drenching rain is called Fritz-Walter-weather in Germany. Don't think someone would have beaten Hungary on a modern pitch.
Did you know, Germany in 54 is still the only world cup winner without playing a team from a different continent? They played only european teams because of those weird group stage rules. After Turkey winning against South Korea and loosing to Germany, Germany knew they had to play Turkey again if they lost the game to Hungary. So they played a reserve team in that 8-3 loss (that's why you shouldn't read to much into that result) and concentrated on the second game against Turkey. They won 7-2. Strange to call it a group, when Hungary and South Korea only played two games while Germany and Turkey had to play 3times and each other twice.