afrocentricity
Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
- Joined
- May 12, 2005
- Messages
- 27,813
Christ, Ronnie is not being kept here against his will ... I hope this helps.
I love the way you have all become experts on what drives Ronaldo.
So people are unhappy about the way he went about the whole transfer saga.
Did he criticize the club? NO
Did he criticize the fans? NO
Did he criticize the manager? NO
Did he criticize the posters of Redcafe? NO
What did he do wrong?
Did he criticize the club? NO
Did he criticize the fans? NO
Did he criticize the manager? NO
Did he criticize the posters of Redcafe? NO
What did he do wrong?
His agreement with Blatter, in terms of what remarks he intended ,were the subject of considerable debate.His posturing and flirtation with the media has been an embarrasment. He agreed with Blatter, and since both have tried to backtrack - that was the most disgraceful part of the whole saga.
He lied.
He tried to wriggle out of his contract.
He actively courted one our biggest European rivals.
He acted like a cnut.
He's been foolish. How many of us have not? But in his case there have been many elements in the saga which have contributed to his indecision, perhaps even confusion. No doubt, at the luxurious remove of being detached from it all; not required to consider the facts and make decisions, we can all assume the comfortable role of armchair pundits. One is reminded of Shakespeare's words 'What the great will do, the poor will prate on'.
All such pundits reveal themselves as prurient observers, each with his or her own version of the great wisdom, which they believe they bring to a debate in which they are luxuriously untroubled by the fine details or the personal angles which so affect the nuanced outcome of that reality which only the object of their speculation can truly know.
Hence, one wearily concludes, the eternal popularity of such mindless tracts as 'Hello' magazine or the gossip columns of various newspapers.
I bet you do not even know exactly what Blatter said!
Earlier this month, Blatter waded into the controversy over the Ronaldo transfer saga by saying he believed a "solution should be found" to clear the air for the player to join Madrid, if he so wished.
"If he stays at a club where he does not feel comfortable to play then it's not good for the player and for the club," Blatter said.
"I'm always in favour of protecting the player and if the player… wants to leave, let him leave."
He added: "I think in football there's too much modern slavery in transferring players or buying players here and there, and putting them somewhere.
"[Fifa] are trying now to intervene in such cases."
Feed me, So you're going to boo him? Congratulations...
The article is tabloid, populist shite of the worst kind. If you can't see that it's just plain sad.
The fact that some are siding with an ABU wum-merchant however, is, sad to say, far more than merely sad. It's disgraceful.
I don't get what you are arguing
Do you agree he has acted in a crap manner? Or are you happy to let that slide just because he has been railroaded into staying? I wish I knew such forgiving people. That lad deserves a bit of shoddy fan treatment, if anything, to deflate his enormous ego.
Of what remarks are you thinking? Was that a lie, or change of mind? Evidence?He lied.
Nope - he acknowledged the extent to which Utd's contract gave them control. That same contract would have ensured as much financial reward as they wanted to insist upon - the figure would be higher since he had recently extended it. (All in Utd's favour tbh.)nickm said:He tried to wriggle out of his contract.
To the extent that the only club to which he expressed interest in moving is one of our rivals - yes. Did you expect him to want to move to Cordoba?nickm said:He actively courted one our biggest European rivals.
Not to the extent of many 'fans' on here tbh.nickm said:He acted like a cnut.
His agreement with Blatter in terms of what remarks he intended were the subject of considerable debate.
We still have only the one portrayal of the context of the question - on which basis I would (as posted) have judged it as 'abhorrent' - although the only such remark he made. No alternative or corroborative translations of both question and answer in context have been given despite appeals.
Is it a back-track or a clarification? Given how much we have all seen the media distort the content of statements to suit their agendas, why do you insist that the most reprehensible interpretations of Ronaldo's remarks here are the right ones?
Apart from that, all he's done is speak the truth - too many fans cannot deal with that it seems.
You well versed in putting words in other people's mouths.
All I have said is that his conduct has been shit and I have no respect for him. There is very little warm feeling from me towards him. Big deal; like he gives a feck what Feed Me of Redcafe thinks.
As an aside, I wouldn't boo a United player at a United game - counter productive.
I love the way you have all become experts on what drives Ronaldo.
I say we know nothing about his motives and who or what pressures have been placed on him, family etc have a big influence on most peoples lives.
I have always thought he believed that if Madrid offered mega bucks and the clubs were happy then great he has his dream challenge but when SAF informed him that not only were United not interested in any offer but no offer had ever been made he is quite happy to stay and he will try and be the best he can. He could have asked for a transfer (and money would not have been a factor in that) which have put the club if a much more difficult position but chose not to.
Ronaldo's no more or less imune than anyone else, and he's old enough to be aware of his actions. If he'd engaged his brain and grown a pair before acting out, he could have sat there having made his intentions clear to the club, without anyone thinking any less of him.
He didn't. Obviously different people will see it in a different way, but you can't blame football fans for acting like football fans.
Fans adore and remember most those who are commited to the club, and who give everything for the cause.
Come on. It's been written all over everything he does since the second he's arrived at the club.
Take Rooney as a comparative example. Wayne Rooney's objective is Manchester United doing well, and Wayne Rooney doing well for Manchester United.
Christiano Ronaldo's objective is Christiano Ronaldo doing well, and looking good, for Manchester United.
If he gave a shit about the club he wouldn't have spent half the summer pissing on it.
So you'd think better of him if he'd lied?
Basically saying that clubs happily move players around like slaves when it suits them and as such players should be able to move around when the mood takes them.
The very fact that the FIFA president dared to bring slavery into the debate is embarrassing and offensive. Even if the players are sometimes sold against their will, to liken them to slaves is a joke.
Blatter has since tried to backtrack from his statements by saying he was totally misquoted and his comments have been distorted. This man has an entire catalogue of spastic quotes.
How did he actually try to wriggle out of his contract, without handing in a transfer request
Come on. It's been written all over everything he does since the second he's arrived at the club.
Take Rooney as a comparative example. Wayne Rooney's objective is Manchester United doing well, and Wayne Rooney doing well for Manchester United.
Christiano Ronaldo's objective is Christiano Ronaldo doing well, and looking good, for Manchester United.
If he gave a shit about the club he wouldn't have spent half the summer pissing on it.
I don't get this notion of a transfer request making United's life any more difficult.
-He would still have the same length contract.
-The fact is, even without the transfer request, we all knew he wanted to go.
Except the remarks about slaves were made in response to an entirely separate question to that containing the name Ronaldo. The 2 disparate items: Ronaldo and slavery, were only connected by the media later - not by Blatter it appears. In the course of a longish interview he'd answered one question about football in general when he aparently wanted to refer to dubious practices that do exist. In an entirely separate question he was asked about Ronaldo apparently being unhappy and wishing to move - he thought that it was best if the players were happy. Only the media decided he'd called Ronaldo a slave - there was little evidence he had done so.
I still think it's likely that Blatter knew how the 2 nearby remarks might get spun. It still dosn't mean that Ronaldo's agreement with Blatter agreed with the spin rather than his remarks though.
you can't blame football fans for acting like football fans.
In case you hadn't noticed, by agitating for a move, by practically begging Real to stump up the money for a move, by agreeing with Sepp Blatter's ludicrous comments than he should be "allowed" to transfer to Madrid. All designed to pressure United into letting him break his contract.
So, we've got blatter apologists now
UPDATE!!!!!
I just decided not to post in Ronaldo threads anymore, so I might reach the goal earlier.
Of what remarks are you thinking? Was that a lie, or change of mind? Evidence?
Nope - he acknowledged the extent to which Utd's contract gave them control. That same contract would have ensured as much financial reward as they wanted to insist upon - the figure would be higher since he had recently extended it. (All in Utd's favour tbh.)
Oh come on Uniteds position would have been virtually untenable ......... there was enough crap about keeping unhappy players without him making any such request can't you imagine every political animal in the world of football would have had their say and both fifa and uefa would be far more likely to be in Madrids camp than ours.
So, we've got blatter apologists now
Basically saying that clubs happily move players around like slaves when it suits them and as such players should be able to move around when the mood takes them.
The very fact that the FIFA president dared to bring slavery into the debate is embarrassing and offensive. Even if the players are sometimes sold against their will, to liken them to slaves is a joke.
Blatter has since tried to backtrack from his statements by saying he was totally misquoted and his comments have been distorted. This man has an entire catalogue of spastic quotes.
Ah, but we do not know the strength of SAF's/Gill's and the Glazer's resolve on this issue. Maybe they would have been true to their word and "sat him in the stands."
I don't buy into this transfer request nonesense. All that would have done was made public Ronaldo's desire to leave. But that was already the world's worst kept secret. He wanted to leave irrespective of a transfer request or not. He was just feathering his nest and making sure that things were still relatively cushty if a move to Madrid did not materialise.
Quite good this, considering it's from Custis
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/article1529510.ece
WELL, hallelujah!
Let’s get something straight right from the off, Cristiano.
It was never your decision in the first place.
Alex Ferguson decided last year — when he handed you a new contract to send your wages soaring — that you were most definitely staying at Manchester United.
He and the club had also made that clear through a tortuous summer of stories being batted back and forth between here and Madrid.
So who on earth do you think you are? To imagine that after two good seasons in five years at Old Trafford you can stand there believing you have your and the club’s destiny in your hands.
Your words in a ‘heart-rending’ interview in a Portuguese paper yesterday stuck in the throat.
First of all you say: “If there’s one thing I’ve never been — nor do I want to be — it is ungrateful.”
Now, hang on. So Ferguson takes you to the biggest club in the world, converts you from a one-trick pony into the greatest player in the world, then you repay him by announcing you want to quit Old Trafford. Not ungrateful?
You added: “I never wanted to leave against United’s will.”
It was clear from the off United never wanted you to leave yet you led them this merry dance until realising the game was up.
So it goes on. Your commitment to the club is obvious because you have bought a big house in Alderley Edge. You were having that built at the start of the year.
Ferguson has — as ever — tried to defend you, despite this summer of madness. His best defence was that your head was turned by the money on offer.
But then you say “. . . money isn’t everything” and add that if it was it would have been easy to stay at United.
You drivel on about what a special place United fans will always have in your heart.
Well, you might get a bit of a shock the next time you trot out at Old Trafford.
Because living in this great city I know exactly what the red half thinks of your winking antics since the European Cup was lifted.
Many United supporters are fed up with you, Ronaldo. Many wanted United just to take the cash, re-invest it and move on.
Because United fans are not brought up on fly-by-night big-time Charlies. They are brought up on legends who devote themselves heart and soul to this club. They are brought up on the stories of the Busby Babes.
And of course more recently of great servants like Roy Keane and those still plying their trade — like Paul Scholes, Gary Neville and Ryan Giggs.
Which is why there has been no popping of champagne corks.
The view of many was ‘Good — but he should never have tried to leave in the first place’.
The situation can be seen as a victory for Ferguson and for clubs against the increasing strength of player power.
Yet I wonder if we will see the real Ronaldo again in a red shirt.
Let us not forget all this is likely to start again in a year’s time.
For, while saying you are staying, you also made it very clear you wanted to go to Real Madrid and still do.
So, with that in mind, how can you really commit yourself to the United cause? After two titles and a European Cup you claimed that in five years at the club you had won everything there was to win. You tack on, of course, your host of personal honours.
Can you imagine someone like Keane or Neville saying this?
Or Giggs, who has 10 title medals and so many others that he needs a reinforced sideboard to hold them all?
The reason United have been so dominant in the last 15 years is because players like them won a medal and immediately forgot about it, setting their sights on the next target.
Keane was the heartbeat of this club for a decade. A United hero.
The club thought he could not be replaced but Ferguson has found a way of rejigging the team to fill the void left by the Irishman. Because no matter how good the players are, Fergie always finds a way to replace them.
He only lets players go if he thinks it is best for the club.
And he has kept you only because he thinks it is best for the club.
Not for him or you — but the club.
Privately he probably wants to stick you in the stand.
You whine: “The Press writes terrible things about me.”
So terrible you were pictured reading it all as your ego forced you on to the pages of this and other papers this summer.
Like the fans, the Press who cover this club are brought up watching legends.
And, Ronaldo, you will never be one of them.
Good article, pretty much sums up my feelings about Ronaldo