Pathetic ramblings from 'journalists' such as Custis and ill informed prejudiced comments from the likes of Alan Green will always leave me leaning towards defending the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo (whatever mistakes the individual in question has made). Players who have few friends in the English media are easy targets for articles such as the one from Custis today.
An article that blatantly appeals to the lowest common denominator containing tired and dated lexis such as 'winker' as well as phrases like 'one trick pony' simply cannot be taken seriously. What kind of professional journalist would use the phrase 'one trick pony' in describing an 18 year old who is quick, has two good feet and can head but lacks consistency?! I despair at times I really do.
Custis makes some points which could be deemed valid yet he ruins it by going completely over the top in a biased one sided article which i'm sure will no doubt influence some of the more gullible and easily led readers of his newspaper.
It seems that to be considered a legend at Manchester United football club longevity is a major factor which is totally fair and understandable. However, it is unfair to dismiss the contribution of someone who doesn't stay for ten years or more and yet has made a significant impact during his time at the club.
For example, players such as Romario, Ronaldo, Rivaldo and Ronaldinho didn't stay at Barcelona for the duration of their career yet they left an indelible mark on the club contributing enormously to its rich history. They came, they went, they were appreciated for what they did. We're going to see a lot more of this type of thing at Manchester United concerning European and South American players. It's not right, it's not wrong, it's just a different way of interpreting how you want your career to plan out.