Rednails
Full Member
I've now read all this thread and amongst the dross there's some good stuff - those who know me will know those posts I rate.
One strand of this thread deserves further emphasis though.
I'm deeply concerned at the reasonably common idea that Custis has 'written what most United supporters think'.
Just think a bit about the implications of this for a moment. It suggests that MOST Utd supporters think in a similar way to an ABU Sun journalist - shouldn't that give you a clue you might be being hoodwinked?
As Pogue's possibly optimistic view suggested - he doesn't think most ARE like that - I (like he) think most lie somewhere between CR7-fanboy and 'Only True Believers Should Play For Us'.
Custis' article was a horrible, calculating combination of self-righteous prudery and the whines of a rejected lover - custom-styled to appeal to certain fans. Ronaldo fails the ideal - he doesn't worship the club (as much as I do?) - he betrays the club and the club's (and my) possible affection. HOW DARE HE?
Simplistic knee-jerk appeals - a tabloid's stock-in-trade - the only reasons some are falling for it is that those emotions are raw and need both soothing and feeding within them.
Very true. The Sun is a despicable paper playing on people's basic human fears and emotions. They make the bullets and get others to fire them, particularly on issues such as race and nationalism.
This article is designed to wind up people who are feeling hurt and emotional about everything that has happened this summer, in the hope that it will lead to more newsworthy stories. They will be there like vultures when Ronaldo makes his first appearance, hoping for a very bad reaction from the crowd.
Dont give them the satisfaction.