ThatOldRedMagic
Full Member
Nah, it makes him a cnut.
And yes, Ince is a cnut too.
Add Cnut (Argie left back who played for us), and you have the three biggest cnuts who have played for United over the last 20 years.
Actually I like cnuts
Nah, it makes him a cnut.
And yes, Ince is a cnut too.
Add Cnut (Argie left back who played for us), and you have the three biggest cnuts who have played for United over the last 20 years.
If one of my employees went on holiday, and used his holiday to engineer a move to one of our rivals, I would sack him.
Again, an irrelevant comment from you.
As far as I can see he thought Madrid wanted him, believed they would pay United mega bucks to get him and thought United would probably accept those mega bucks ........... I am pretty sure most people would have acted the same or a lot worse than Ronaldo in similar circumstances.
Hehe. That's a good analogy.
The thing is with this article is that Custis has hit the nail on the head so many times to the extent that it's almost disturbing. It worries me that he has written something very similar to what i would have done.
Actually I like cnuts
Not with our emplyment laws you wouldn't
Oh yes I would
Ah! So you're as big a cnut as he is?
Oh yes I would
Then you would be paying out big bucks and your star man would be smiling all the way to the bank
Nah, it makes him a cnut.
And yes, Ince is a cnut too.
Add Cnut (Argie left back who played for us), and you have the three biggest cnuts who have played for United over the last 20 years.
Not with our emplyment laws you wouldn't
You would probably regret doing that.
Calderon won Madrid's controversial presidential elections with just over 8,000 votes – of 80,000 members. He has embarked on a rather desperate search for legitimacy ever since. Like a politician in mid-campaign, he has endlessly visited supporters' clubs, trying to win over fans. Madrid may have won two successive league titles but Calderon has not won the fans.
I've never regretted sacking anyone.
If you got a good reason for sacking someone, its all good and you dont have to regret anything. But a person cant be sacked for being a cnut, some people are, but may very well be a good employee.
You could probably sue for breach of contract, if you put in something in the contract. It's just that most employers don't bother, doesn't mean they always won't.
Why do you think Ronaldo wouldn't put in a transfer request?
I wouldn't sack anyone for being a cnut.
I would sack them if I found out they were speaking to a rival.
Ronaldo - helped us win the league 2 years in a row, top scorer last season, helped us win the CL, i know it was a team effort, but ronaldo played a BIG part! I will always respect him for that, obviously the likes of scholes, giggs, neville are in another class in terms of respect, but they're a different story, they're fans of the club, born and bred in manchester (ok not giggs but you know what i mean). Its different for Ronaldo. Yes he didnt handle the transfer situation very well, but i mean FFS, some people here almost want to lynch him!
Get over yourselves you self-righteous cnuts, the situation is over now, atleast for another year, stop all this ronaldo bashing, and look forward to the coming season.
Because I believe he never wanted to fall out with Fergie or the club ........
I wouldn't sack anyone for being a cnut.
I would sack them if I found out they were speaking to a rival.
I wouldn't sack anyone for being a cnut.
I would sack them if I found out they were speaking to a rival.
Absolutely spot on!
Not much else to say, except that I never thought I'd see the day when an article in the Sun is supposedly hitting the mark... An alarm bell should ring when you find yourself agreeing with one of the worst rags in the shitty world of tabloids.
thats a loyality issue, but if your worker was hard to replace, would you still sack him because you felt hurt by his inloyalty against you? Probably your guy would get a brand new job at your rival if you fired him anyway.
I'd say you are very naive.
When a player hands in a transfer request, he stands to lose out financially, compared to when a player gets sold without having handed one in.
THAT I believe is the reason Ronaldo didn't.
I'd say you are very naive.
When a player hands in a transfer request, he stands to lose out financially, compared to when a player gets sold without having handed one in.
THAT I believe is the reason Ronaldo didn't.
the trouble is the shitty world of the sun is bought by enough people to make it the biggest selling newspaper in the uk.
Even if he/she was your best employee? someone who brought in most of the cash? someone who's work was always top quality?
I am naive? do you for one moment not think Madrid could have easily compensated Ronaldo for that!
it's a lovely thing watching karma, thick, long and uncut, violate the unlubed rectal orifice of a hypocrite.
a beautiful thing.
I would sack him out of principle.
I am naive? do you for one moment not think Madrid could have easily compensated Ronaldo for that!
Maybe. Signing fees are quite big though, could easily have added another 5-10% to the transfer fee.
thats always left me pondering as to why?? why do so many people buy the sun?
Fine by me, I wouldnt if I knew he/she would be hard to replace and it would be bad for business.
the trouble is the shitty world of the sun is bought by enough people to make it the biggest selling newspaper in the uk.
Yes.
And the person would not be able to work for a rival for 12 months.