So one interview being horribly twisted and getting everyone here riled up and angry with him again, then being shown to actually be a positive interview for us, doesn't remotely make you wonder how many of the other comments he has made in the press were equally twisted?
Like the Blatter interview. I asked this question way back and don't think I got an answer. So far in this entire thread I've seen a grand total of one person say that they saw Blatter's interview themselves and understood it. And guess what? They said the media somewhat twisted that as well, as he was first talking about the slavery and it wasn't until later, after he was specifically asked about Ronaldo, said that Man Utd and Madrid should sit down and work it out themselves. He also said they should work it out so that Ronaldo could move if he wanted to, but never said anything about Ronaldo being a slave. Now if anyone else actualy saw and understood the inverview themselves, please give your take on it. Because if that is how it happene, then obviously Blatter's comments were taken out of context, which obviously then took Ronaldo's 'I agree with Blatter' comment also out of context. He was either talking about slavery in football in general, or the comment about Man Utd and Real Madrid should work it out. Either way, hardly saying that he felt like a slave.
Obviously, he would quite like to move. But whenever asked about his future, he'd say things like he didn't know the future, or that it was up to Man Utd and Real Madrid to work it out. He constantly tried to keep himself out of it, as he didn't want to burn his bridges with us when he would probably be staying here, but didn't want to piss Real Madrid off and put a future move in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that stance of saying very little also allowed the media to make up literally thousands of stories and report his few comments in many different ways.