Rykker_4united
Full Member
oh that makes more sense.I missed a comma. They don't count as South Americans as they're Central Americans.
oh that makes more sense.I missed a comma. They don't count as South Americans as they're Central Americans.
You mean these permanent first team players. Chelsea were not shit last year. They had a good squad. Costa is unproven at EPL level, and looked a bit of a donkey at the world cup. Fabregas is class, but from my recollection the midfield was Hazard, Oscar, Ramieres and Matic. Replacing one of those for Fabregas does what?
How can It be nonsense. Many strikers from outside the EPL have flopped. Many have done well. We dont know what Costa will do. So it is actually nonsense to assume he will be an automatic hit. Torres and BA were PL proven and did not fit into Chelsea system. Eto a proven CL striker didn't do much. So it is hopeful, not guarantee Costa will solve their problem. Look at Arsenal for some additional evidence of known non-EpL strikers that flopped.Unproven in EPL is such a nonsense. Fellaini was PL proven, Modric was not when Spurs bought him
Fact is the position they lacked in the most was forward. They got a good one in. They don't play a 4-man midfield, they play with 4231 and they lacked one man for the setup.
How can It be nonsense. Many strikers from outside the EPL have flopped. Many have done well. We dont know what Costa will do. So it is actually nonsense to assume he will be an automatic hit. Torres and BA were PL proven and did not fit into Chelsea system. Eto a proven CL striker didn't do much. So it is hopeful, not guarantee Costa will solve their problem. Look at Arsenal for some additional evidence of known non-EpL strikers that flopped.
As for their formation and FAbregas, excellent player. But whether Chelsea play 3, 4 or 5 in the middle it is certainly not their weak spot. They bossed everyone of the top teams last year.
How does it baffle you? if i'm a top player i wouldn't look at Arsenal if i had other offers from better teams. This has nothing to do with Arsenal more to do with Sanchez picking them over winning clubs right now. Yes thats how Arsenal get back to winning by signing top players but my question was why would Sanchez pick them over other teams that are winning league titles now?
Gunnersaurus does the fisting.I'll believe it when I see Sanchez fisting gunnarsaurus, if they pull it off he's great player though and I suspect his skill set matches the Prem better than La Liga.
You havs just defeated your own arguments.It is also nonsense to assume he'll definitely be a failure. He scored 36 goals last season in 52 games, that is phenomenal. He is a misfit for the way Spain try to play but he was brilliant for the way Atletico plays and Chelsea plays in a similar fashion. He has got physical presence, which I think is a great asset for a forward in the PL, he is lethal in the box, I really wouldn't know why so many think he'll be a failure. It is always a possibility ofcourse, but being PL proven is a big bunch of nonsense, simply because it is not relevant. Torres was the best striker in the PL for a very long time, yet now he sucks at Chelsea, simply because he lost his touch and the way Chelsea plays doesn't fit him. What is important is the fitness of the player, the sharpness and confidence of a player, the skills as a striker and wheter the way your team plays fits your style or not. Diego seems fit, he has looked very sharp and confident, he should fit the way Chelsea plays and he certainly has some important skills as a striker. PL proven or not doesn't have anything to do with it, Ibrahimovic isn't PL proven either, you wouldn't doubt he'd be a fantastic PL striker however.
People are still banging on about Wenger's 'youth experiment' and 'reluctance to spend' when it's now proven beyond all reasonable doubt that he didn't spend because he didn't have the forking money.
The same way a manager could convince a player to sign for them because they have a vision. Players aren't always motivated by the same glory hunting crap we as fans pigeon hole ourselves in. They can see a project and want to be part of it. Also, you don't know if Sanchez could be the player that takes them back to winning the league. You're also forgetting that Wenger is a highly respected and influential manager in Europe. It won't take long for him to convince a player to join Arsenal.
Edit: and why would he join Juventus? Where's the thrill in joining a club you know is going to win the league anyway? There's no challenge there.
More likely it'll be:I wonder how will Arsenal play him.
Wilshere RamseyThere are lots of pace, skill and quality of passing up front. Sanchez will also score plenty of goals, Walcott and Ramsey will score quite a few too.
Ozil
Walcott Sanchez Carzola
Well I'd suspect a large part of their decisions are made on how the teams actually play football, the other players at the club, how he would fit in, how they aspire to play, and all that requires the manager to convince the player.I really don't know much about Sanchez but this nonsense of vision always baffles me. Players always tend to make a decision based of the financial aspect or at the chance of winning trophies. Arsenal are a big club and they have an equal chance of winning than any other big clubs in the PL so his decision could be based on that.
I really doubt he was sold on any "vision" which Arsene might have wanted to share with him.
How can It be nonsense. Many strikers from outside the EPL have flopped. Many have done well. We dont know what Costa will do. So it is actually nonsense to assume he will be an automatic hit. Torres and BA were PL proven and did not fit into Chelsea system. Eto a proven CL striker didn't do much. So it is hopeful, not guarantee Costa will solve their problem. Look at Arsenal for some additional evidence of known non-EpL strikers that flopped.
As for their formation and FAbregas, excellent player. But whether Chelsea play 3, 4 or 5 in the middle it is certainly not their weak spot. They bossed everyone of the top teams last year.
Well I'd suspect a large part of their decisions are made on how the teams actually play football, the other players at the club, how he would fit in, how they aspire to play, and all that requires the manager to convince the player.
I wonder how will Arsenal play him.
Wilshere RamseyThere are lots of pace, skill and quality of passing up front. Sanchez will also score plenty of goals, Walcott and Ramsey will score quite a few too.
Ozil
Walcott Sanchez Carzola
He's a worker, he's tough, he's got the tools to be fine in the Premiership. Arsenal are stacked though, and Wenger loves giving random players plenty of time - like Rosicky.
He's a worker, he's tough, he's got the tools to be fine in the Premiership. Arsenal are stacked though, and Wenger loves giving random players plenty of time - like Rosicky.
He is a worker although he has been guilty of drifting in & out of matches. However, I this past season I saw a revitalized player for Barcelona. Definitely believe he's gotten better with Barcelona and even the player would & has acknowledged that - describing it as learning football all over again. He needed to play elsewhere, IMHO, to really get the most out of his talent. Good luck to El Jugadorazo
I can't wait to see him in action... I think he can be a revelation in this league once he gets accustomed to the pace of the league.
Who else do you think will be moved on? I'm assuming Tello will to make way for Deulofeu.
That formation will be picked off on the counter, especially in the big matches, IMO.I wonder how will Arsenal play him.
Wilshere RamseyThere are lots of pace, skill and quality of passing up front. Sanchez will also score plenty of goals, Walcott and Ramsey will score quite a few too.
Ozil
Walcott Sanchez Carzola
What happened to Afellay?
I remember host of top clubs wanting him before he joined Barca.
He does loads of defensive work, more then most wingers, so that's bollocks, he's also a very hard worker. He is most definitely a winger, and a world class one at that.Shame we weren't in for him....however unsure where we'd fit him in. He's not a winger as he doesnt do the defending. And we have plenty for the front 3 (RVP, Rooney, Welbeck, Hernandez, Kagawa, Mata, Januzaj) if this is the formation, unless we were to let some go.
But he's a great signing for Arsenal - proper player type they've been crying out for.
We probably were. he wanted Champions League football apparently. Of course, we are not going to admit that nowShame we weren't in for him.
We probably were. he wanted Champions League football apparently. Of course, we are not going to admit that now
We probably were. he wanted Champions League football apparently. Of course, we are not going to admit that now
The same way a manager could convince a player to sign for them because they have a vision. Players aren't always motivated by the same glory hunting crap we as fans pigeon hole ourselves in. They can see a project and want to be part of it. Also, you don't know if Sanchez could be the player that takes them back to winning the league. You're also forgetting that Wenger is a highly respected and influential manager in Europe. It won't take long for him to convince a player to join Arsenal.
Edit: and why would he join Juventus? Where's the thrill in joining a club you know is going to win the league anyway? There's no challenge there.