Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea are not stronger than they were back then. The teams at the top have just gotten worse. Back then premier league teams used to be getting to semi finals and the final of the cl, now some of them struggle to even get out of the group.I must have been asleep back then. Arsenal, City, Chelsea and Liverpool are all stronger and few teams nowadays are guaranteed points. I completely disagree with both of you.
Not at all. He has shown that his philosophy (if it is supported by the club, players, fans etc) give as much results as any other philosophy. He also makes team play good football. So while we get trophies and play great football, I don't give a shit how many superstar we sign. If I want signing superstars as a priority I would choose to support Madrid.Depressing
NoWinNoFee and NoArroJustBetta in one thread is too alike.
They've bought shite, and I wouldn't want any of their signings near our team.
Not much we could've done except relocate to London.
We finished thirty or so points above them and then they signed Sakho and Toure and finished twenty points above us. It shows very well how signing players isn't the most important thing.Neither would would I, but the fact is Liverpool still finished 5 places above us last season and bringing in numbers. Right now we have less numbers than last season, if you think LVG alone will bridge that 22 point to City gap and that 20 point gap, then you want us to play a risky game.
Neither of them (obviously bar City) have been near as strong as on those years Raul mentioned. On those years, three English teams reached consistently semi finals of UCL while now barely a team or two reach quarter finals. And then the next group of teams completely fail on Europa League. EPL IMO currently is the second - third stongest league in Europe (after Spain and possibly Germany) while on that time it was a distant first.
So, time to wake up
Not to worry:
United’s executive vice chairman is planning to spend heavily this summer in a bid to revive the club’s fortunes, following a disastrous season under David Moyes.
Luke Shaw, Toni Kroos and Cesc Fabregas are all targets for in-coming manager Louis van Gaal – who is expected to be handed up to £200m to overhaul his squad.
And Woodward insisted that figures released today proved United will be able to challenge for Europe’s biggest names, despite failing to qualify for the Champions League next season.
“This puts us in a healthy financial position to continue to invest in the squad," he said. “Everyone at the Club is working hard to ensure the team is back challenging for the title and trophies next season.”
Not at all. He has shown that his philosophy (if it is supported by the club, players, fans etc) give as much results as any other philosophy. He also makes team play good football. So while we get trophies and play great football, I don't give a shit how many superstar we sign. If I want signing superstars as a priority I would choose to support Madrid.
Don't you think Moyes was the biggest reason that we finish 22(?) points behind city?Neither would would I, but the fact is Liverpool still finished 5 places above us last season and bringing in numbers. Right now we have less numbers than last season, if you think LVG alone will bridge that 22 point to City gap and that 20 point gap, then you want us to play a risky game.
Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea are not stronger than they were back then. The teams at the top have just gotten worse. Back then premier league teams used to be getting to semi finals and the final of the cl, now some of them struggle to even get out of the group.
Nice. The do tempt you to the "dark side" with all shiny players they sign.
There is absolutely no way, mate. You was what a poor Barca did to the champions of England last season, and we saw what an underdog like Atletico Madrid did to what is regarded the best team on England. And we saw how Bayern beat both us and Arsenal.No chance!
We will just have to agree to disagree. Next season will be the strongest ever. Quote me next summer.
Don't you think Moyes was the biggest reason that we finish 22(?) points behind city?
It is partly because the others have regressed. Are you suggesting that city (the champions) are as good as or better than Chelsea from 04/05 and 05/06 and united from 06/07 to 08/09? Teams that used to do well in EUROPE as well as the league. Madness.Liverpool were challenging for the title this year. Are you suggesting this was because the others regressed? Madness.
City who were humiliated by the worst Barca on at-least the last 5 years. I think that each of Liverpool, United, Chelsea and Arsenal of those years would have reached 95 points on last season in the league. The quality was absolutely shambolic on what is regarded by some people (mainly those who watch only it) as the best league in the world.It is partly because the others have regressed. are you suggesting that city (the champions) are as good as or better than Chelsea from 04/05 and 05/06 and united from 06/07 to 08/09? Teams that used to do well in EUROPE as well as the league. Madness.
Agreed. I love the way there is always some of the best players in the world at he club, but I don't like the lack of stability and the constant changing of players among other things. Other big clubs in spain do the same though and so do clubs in Italy. It seems like clubs in England are beginning to follow suit too (although not all of these clubs do it at the same scale Madrid do).
Never liked your policy and many times it had backfired. Selling Makelele for whatever reasons be it cause he wasn't handsome or because you 'needed' Beckham was a terrible thing you did with big consequences. Or sacking Del Bosque for only winning 2 La Liga and 2 UCL within 4 years set you a few years back and you needed a decade or so to get back when you were. Of course, at times it is a great thing (especially on the summer) but I think that a more balanced system is better.
There is absolutely no way, mate. You was what a poor Barca did to the champions of England last season, and we saw what an underdog like Atletico Madrid did to what is regarded the best team on England. And we saw how Bayern beat both us and Arsenal.
I don't think that there is even a slim chance that 4 English teams will reach quarters of UCL or 3 EPL teams will reach the semis. If two of them do it, it will be a great success, but I doubt it'll happen. Most likely Liverpool will fail on group stage (being in the last pot if I am not mistaken) and then from the other three only Chelsea reaching the semis again. EPL on the last few years has been a shadow of it's former self but hopefully it will improve on these years and signs are good considering that some good players are coming. But to reach the height of 2006-2009 it won't be an easy task and it may need a few years.
It is partly because the others have regressed. are you suggesting that city (the champions) are as good as or better than Chelsea from 04/05 and 05/06 and united from 06/07 to 08/09? Teams that used to do well in EUROPE as well as the league. Madness.
Not at all. He has shown that his philosophy (if it is supported by the club, players, fans etc) give as much results as any other philosophy. He also makes team play good football. So while we get trophies and play great football, I don't give a shit how many superstar we sign. If I want signing superstars as a priority I would choose to support Madrid.
Yes they have obviously worked very hard to spend over £60m on Herrera and Shaw and let players like Sanchez and Fabregas and most likely also Kroos slip away from them for figures under £30m. I'am sorry but Uniteds business in the transfermarket isn't making me happy one bit. It is a step forward from doing absolutley nothing an entire summer long and then spending £27.5m last minute on Fellaini, but you could hardly take a step backwards from that one, it is not what it is supposed to be if you look at other clubs. ofcourse not being in the CL and having such a disaster of a season isn't helping, but that situation is of their own making.
I really hope Woodward is going to come out with a couple more signings that will really improve our squad like Vidal, Di Maria, Hummels etc, but I really don't have much confidence in it.
It isn;t flawed at all. That is the benchmark. You can't take only EPL in consideration and say that it is a great league if EPL teams get humiliated from foreign counterparts. City was embarrased from Barca this year and were embarrased from BVB the last one. They couldn't even pass the group stage last year FFS, the champions of England. Could you imagine the Maureen Chelsea or United on 2006-2007 up to 2009-2010 bot being able to pass the group stage on UCL?Using Europe to compare EPL strength is flawed. The Champions League, in my opinion has improved leaps and bounds too.
City are easily as good as Chelsea 04-06. Are you kidding me?
That Chelsea team could go toe-to-toe with the Barcelona team with Ronaldinho et al and even beat them in 04/05 and 06/07. This city team went out in the group stages twice in a row and lost to the worst Barcelona team in years that won nothing this year. Its not even just the fact that they lost to them but the manner in which they lost to them (and yet still bizarelly blamed the ref and sky sports claimed kompany played well ). They pretty much stumbled over the line this year also, while that Chelsea team was well ahead of its competitors.Using Europe to compare EPL strength is flawed. The Champions League, in my opinion has improved leaps and bounds too.
City are easily as good as Chelsea 04-06. Are you kidding me?
Perfectly plausible that he may prefer London.
It isn;t flawed at all. That is the benchmark. You can't take only EPL in consideration and say that it is a great league if EPL teams get humiliated from foreign counterparts. City was embarrased from Barca this year and were embarrased from BVB the last one. They couldn't even pass the group stage last year FFS, the champions of England. Could you imagine the Maureen Chelsea or United on 2006-2007 up to 2009-2010 bot being able to pass the group stage on UCL?
The same song is for Europa too. English teams are worse then their counterparts even on that competition. So, how in the end this is that a strong league. Spain currently is miles better as are showing their big 3 but also other teams who consistenly win Europa.
I think you need to slow down a bit, maybe lower your expectations?
A top manager can do wonders, look At Mourinho/Brenden last season or even Martinez. My point, buying top players is not always the answer.. Team morals/spirit/unity is far bigger factor then any shiny signings.
Don't be disappointed if we don't sign Di Maria etc.. As long as Van gaal make us play like a team - we will be fine. There is always next transfer window and next Di Maria etc.
Na, don't agree with you. Our current squad was more then capable to finish last season in top 4. For me hiring a top manager is bigger factor then any top signings. A top manager can make most of a average squad but I think a average manager will make top players look sh**.Not at all, I think he was part of the reason. But i think the main reason we finished 22 points behind City was the greatest manager of all time left us and we have an average squad with a lot of deadwood and I (and many other people) said it like that even when Sir Alex was here.
I don't want all of them, but atleast one top player for a position we are lacking top players in would make sense in what is supposed to be a big spending (trying to adjust the wrongs from last season) summer.
Shaw and herrera are nice players, but they aren't top players and they won't be game changers for us. They'll improve us a bit, yet we have paid for them like they are some of the best players in their position. I have no problem with overpaying, but if it is going to stand in the way from signing players like Sanchez for an actually more than reasonable fee when they are available then feck it.
That Chelsea team could go toe-to-toe with the Barcelona team with Ronaldinho et al and even beat them in 04/05 and 06/07. This city team went out in the group stages twice in a row and lost to the worst Barcelona team in years that won nothing this year. Its not even just the fact that they lost to them but the manner in which they lost to them (and yet still bizarelly blamed the ref and sky sports claimed kompany played well ). They pretty much stumbled over the line this year also, while that Chelsea team was well ahead of its competitors.
I don't accept the Chelsea thing at all. Look at the teamsheet, not what they achieved at the time. For me, Aguero, Yaya, Sliva etc win the day comfortably.
That Chelsea team was strong in all areas, there's a reason why they got the record points total, they were excellent.
Shaw/Herrera? What about RVP/Mata/Adnan/kagawa/Rooney/Wellbeck Or our youngsters Wilson/Lingard etc. I think it's a bit immature of us to totally ignore Carick/Fletcher as players. They are not world class but they can play for the shirt and put a honest shift.I don't want all of them, but atleast one top player for a position we are lacking top players in would make sense in what is supposed to be a big spending (trying to adjust the wrongs from last season) summer.
Shaw and herrera are nice players, but they aren't top players and they won't be game changers for us. They'll improve us a bit, yet we have paid for them like they are some of the best players in their position. I have no problem with overpaying, but if it is going to stand in the way from signing players like Sanchez for an actually more than reasonable fee when they are available then feck it.
I don't accept the Chelsea thing at all. Look at the teamsheet, not what they achieved at the time. For me, Aguero, Yaya, Sliva etc win the day comfortably.
You can only benchmark them if they were equal and everything was constant. It isn't.
If we compare player by player, I would go with something like:I don't accept the Chelsea thing at all. Look at the teamsheet, not what they achieved at the time. For me, Aguero, Yaya, Sliva etc win the day comfortably.
If we compare player by player, I would go with something like:
Cech > Hart
Ferreira =< Zabaleta
Terry > Kompany
Carvalho > Nastasic/Demichelis
Cole > Kolarov/Clichy
Makelele > Fernandinho
Essien = Yaya Toure
Lampard > Silva
Cole < Aguero
Robben/Gudjohnsen >= Nasri
Drogba > Dzeko/Negredo
I think that Chelsea of that time is so much better than this City that it isn't even funny. On a hypothetical game, I guess that it would have been a slaughter.
Anyway, my last post in this topic, so lets go back to Sanchez. Good signing for both Arsenal and for the quality of the league. He'll have much more impact than Ozil.