Bojan11
Full Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,343
People keep using Valencia extending his contract as a sign we not going for him. We could get rid of Young and Nani.
People keep using Valencia extending his contract as a sign we not going for him. We could get rid of Young and Nani.
Jeez. Where will he fit in?I can't see where he'd fit in. Even if we sell Nani and Young (I'd be surprised if Young went, unfortunately), that leaves Januzaj, Kagawa, Valencia, Zaha, Lawrence and Welbeck likely competing for one spot. No room for him, really.
---------------- RVP ----------------
-?????--------Mata--------Rooney-
-------------------------------------
I'd rather just rotate Kagawa and Welbz.
Why do caftards continue to fornulate these formations like they know LvG's tactics and it's their personal burden to squeeze everyone in? Secondly why the bollocks is Rooney on the wing in so many of them? He is fecking shite out there. He's getting dropped.
It's all speculation because that's all there is to do at this point.
Rooney's on the wing because 4-2-3-1 fits our squad the best and Mata is a better #10.
It won't happen, it's just posters trying force every player into the starting 11, someone will have to miss the odd game.Why do caftards continue to fornulate these formations like they know LvG's tactics and it's their personal burden to squeeze everyone in? Secondly why the bollocks is Rooney on the wing in so many of them? He is fecking shite out there. He's getting dropped.
I can't see where he'd fit in. Even if we sell Nani and Young (I'd be surprised if Young went, unfortunately), that leaves Januzaj, Kagawa, Valencia, Zaha, Young, Lawrence and Welbeck likely competing for one spot. No room for him, really.
---------------- RVP ----------------
-?????--------Mata--------Rooney-
-------------------------------------
I'd rather just rotate Kagawa and Welbz.
Because either way with or without Sanchez, Rooney is second best in AM and striker position to Mata and RvP. It's either on the wing or play him as RvP partner in 4-4-2.Secondly why the bollocks is Rooney on the wing in so many of them? He is fecking shite out there. He's getting dropped.
Even if we don't get Vidal (I really hope we do), we can get in Strootman to play next to Herrera but if we lose Sanchez this summer, then its going to be doubly hard to get a good winger later.
It will be Suarez to Barcelona with Sanchez heading their way unfortunately.
What's the last player exchange at a high level, Cole for Gallas? I don't see that happening at all.
If he goes to Liverpool, I will kill a rabbit.
Robben just signed a contract. He is also 31 right? Just because he is Dutch doesn't mean he is moving. Di Maria had a great season at Madrid. Doubt they will want to move him. And Moura has had an underwhelming season and PSG are trying to build a Brazilian squad there. So doubt he is going to move this summer as well.
I can't see where he'd fit in. Even if we sell Nani and Young (I'd be surprised if Young went, unfortunately), that leaves Januzaj, Kagawa, Valencia, Zaha, Young, Lawrence and Welbeck likely competing for one spot. No room for him, really.
---------------- RVP ----------------
-?????--------Mata--------Rooney-
-------------------------------------
I'd rather just rotate Kagawa and Welbz.
i suppose nani could be sold if Van gaal dosnt rate him, but i don't get how we will of load young with out continuing to pay a huge chunk of his wages, which i can't see unit ever doingPeople keep using Valencia extending his contract as a sign we not going for him. We could get rid of Young and Nani.
First thoughts are it's too much considering our already big amounts of spending.£40m for Sanchez. Should Woodward pay it?
Pay it. It's not my money.£40m for Sanchez. Should Woodward pay it?
Is this a wum?
Our wide players contain Nani, Valencia and Young. He would be a colossal improvement on our options.No. Sanchez would be completely unnecessary. He would make us marginally better, but the money would be better spent elsewhere. Anything he adds to the attack we'd lose in having no defensive support.