peterstorey
Still not banned
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2002
- Messages
- 37,291
No I think he worked it out for himself, it's pretty bloody obvious.
No I think he worked it out for himself, it's pretty bloody obvious.
Our defensive issues were more to do with injuries leaving us without any fullbacks. Wenger's always made the trade-off in favour of attacking threat v defensive cover in CM.
That's going back to 98 when we also had Parlour playing right midfield in a 442. Vieira + Gilberto was very attacking playing high up the pitch, and relying on Gilberto's mobility for cover (see Flamini as well).Not when you he had Petit and Vieira in the engine room. Now that really was a tough side to break down, whatever instructions he was giving them.
Same applies to Vieira and Gilberto Silva, come to think of it.
That's going back to 98 when we also had Parlour playing right midfield in a 442. Vieira + Gilberto was very attacking playing high up the pitch, and relying on Gilberto's mobility for cover (see Flamini as well).
Relative to Gilberto and Flamini yes, but he brings other things to the party and we've turned from a counterattacking team to possession-based team in the last 6 years. Arteta's role in the latter part of last season has changed from what he did at Everton; when Jack's back Song can resume his role as the more defensive of the two.So is Song's weakness is his lack of mobility?
Or is the problem these alleged briefings from Wenger that won't allow Song (a converted centre-half) get back to help out a 30 year old Mikael Arteta, who's always needed at least one more defensive midfield partner throughout his career to date?
Relative to Gilberto and Flamini yes, but he brings other things to the party and we've turned from a counterattacking team to possession-based team in the last 6 years. Arteta's role in the latter part of last season has changed from what he did at Everton; when Jack's back Song can resume his role as the more defensive of the two.
It was necessary because Arteta's passing isn't penetrative enough in the final third. He did very well in the deeper role and it panned out pretty well since we ended up 3rd after a disastrous start.Do you think that giving Arteta a role he'd never played before, combined with Wenger's (alleged) briefing to Song that he need not help him defensively, was a good idea by your manager?
Do you think that giving Arteta a role he'd never played before, combined with Wenger's (alleged) briefing to Song that he need not help him defensively, was a good idea by your manager?
It was necessary because Arteta's passing isn't penetrative enough in the final third. He did very well in the deeper role and it panned out pretty well since we ended up 3rd after a disastrous start.
Is there a substantial evidence that Arsenal have conceded goals owing to Song's advancing role?
Or are you just spouting cliched statement, since Song is spotted beyond his half?
The point is look at the balance of the team with Song/Arteta, particularly with Song in a more advanced role. We more or less matched City and Utd with Song doing more more attacking and clocking up 11 assists way more than any other CM in the league, even Yaya who played as an AM for half the season.That "disastrous start" was part of the season as a whole. Believe me, I'd like to scratch our last few games from the record books but that's not the way football works. .
Is there a substantial evidence that Arsenal have conceded goals owing to Song's advancing role?
Or are you just spouting cliched statement, since Song is spotted beyond his half?
The point is look at the balance of the team with Song/Arteta, particularly with Song in a more advanced role. We more or less matched City and Utd with Song doing more more attacking and clocking up 11 assists way more than any other CM in the league, even Yaya who played as an AM for half the season.
What the feck are you on about now? What kind of "substantial evidence" are you looking for here? Is this the same "substantial evidence" that gave you the inside track on Wenger's pre-match briefings to Song?
Most goals came from right or center backs being pulled too far.
With that pair it wasn't characterised by anything of the sort and our defensive record was fine after the first 5/6 games until we had a blip losing 4 fullbacks for a spell and another losing Arteta. Song was outstanding attacking from CM (see your beloved assists) and Arteta did well in a deeper role.That's just it, though. The balance was all wrong. Song did a very good job in the final third but your whole season was characterised by an understrength defence getting repeatedly overrun without enough support from midfield.
Doubt that'll make Van Persie too happy if true.Agreed personal terms with Barca: http://www.thenational.ae/sport/football/alex-song-has-agreed-terms-with-barcelona
If Arsenal can get £20m they may aswell snap Barca's hands off.
Doubt that'll make Van Persie too happy if true.
Isn't that completely illegal? That article says they did the same thing with Fabregas - agreed personal terms with him before approaching Arsenal. I didn't think you were allowed to do that. If nothing else, it's a cnut's move because it basically gets the player on your side before you start even negotiating with the club, putting the seller on the back foot because they're in a position where the player is telling them they want to leave, too.
Which is why I'm pretty sure it's illegal. fecking Barcelona.
Which is why I'm pretty sure it's illegal.
Essentially it's tapping up.Isn't that completely illegal? That article says they did the same thing with Fabregas - agreed personal terms with him before approaching Arsenal. I didn't think you were allowed to do that. If nothing else, it's a cnut's move because it basically gets the player on your side before you start even negotiating with the club, putting the seller on the back foot because they're in a position where the player is telling them they want to leave, too.
Which is why I'm pretty sure it's illegal. fecking Barcelona.
He would only end up being a backup player there. Seems a bit of a strange move.
He would only end up being a backup player there. Seems a bit of a strange move.
He would only end up being a backup player there. Seems a bit of a strange move.
Isn't the standard order that the buying club asks permission to speak with a player to formally see whether they're interested in joining, personal terms can be agreed right there before the two clubs start negotiating a fee. So the article would suggest that Arsenal were aware of Barca's interest and gave them permission to speak to Song - it doesn't necessarily mean that they'll sell him though it usually works out that way eventually.Isn't that completely illegal? That article says they did the same thing with Fabregas - agreed personal terms with him before approaching Arsenal. I didn't think you were allowed to do that. If nothing else, it's a cnut's move because it basically gets the player on your side before you start even negotiating with the club, putting the seller on the back foot because they're in a position where the player is telling them they want to leave, too.
Which is why I'm pretty sure it's illegal. fecking Barcelona.
Probably have the same role as Keita. That or play as a centre back.If that's the sacrifice he has to make to get some silverware in his career, he might consider it seriously
Assuming Barca are after Song as a cheaper alternative to Javi Martinez. With them out of the race we should pay whatever Bilbao are after.
People say that about most players transferring to the really top clubs. I'm sure they all arrive there believing that they can force their way into the best XI. They need that self-belief to be the players they are.