Kant-ona
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2013
- Messages
- 980
I trust our scouts more than ratings on whoscored.
Yes I'm fully aware of where Vidic came from & how gash he was while he adjusted his game to the EPL. And how can you rate "shite" players? Seems a bit of a contradiction....
Don't see anything akin to Vidic in Dragovic, few YouTube vids & nothing much to get giddy about. I personally don't see why people are getting excited & claiming he's better than what we have. Really he's an unknown quality & if it happens it happens & we'll have to see how he gets on...
Of course. As everyone should.
Saying that we have been arguably the worst team in the transfer market in the last few years. The only real successes since we signed Vidic and Evra have been Tevez (considering that he was on a loan), De Gea, RVP and Hernandez. Probably Nani, Valencia and Rafael too.
Which is really bad considering how many others have failed or just didn't made an impact here.
Because there are actually ppl that watched him a lot more than just on some freaking YoutTube vids.
You won't get many better CBs at that age. Simple as.
I'll leave it at that this thread is a disaster with too many ppl that have never even heard his name suddenly coming out and claiming he wasn't good enough.
Of course. As everyone should.
Saying that we have been arguably the worst team in the transfer market in the last few years. The only real successes since we signed Vidic and Evra have been Tevez (considering that he was on a loan), De Gea, RVP and Hernandez. Probably Nani, Valencia and Rafael too.
Which is really bad considering how many others have failed or just didn't made an impact here.
Forgot about Carrick. And I doubt that Mata was even scouted. Similarily to Di Maria, it was just a world class player becoming available.Bit harsh on Carrick, and Mata imo, and it's way too early to be judging this seasons purchases just yet, sure Di Maria, Herrera, and Shaw will come good with time.
You also have to remember the market we were dipping into since Vidic, and Evra, we were very much after bargains/future stars, players like Obertan, Owen, and Young wouldn't have been on the agenda if we hadn't been held back in the transfer, our one big money signing in the midst of the worse of the debt was Berbatov and he was class, but just didn't fit Fergie's style.
Anderson, Hargreaves, and to a lesser extent Young have been expensive flops since the Glazer takeover which isn't too bad really, for me 'small money' punts like Tosic, Bebe, Buttner etc just can't be counted as we were almost forced into it.
Bit harsh on Carrick, and Mata imo, and it's way too early to be judging this seasons purchases just yet, sure Di Maria, Herrera, and Shaw will come good with time.
You also have to remember the market we were dipping into since Vidic, and Evra, we were very much after bargains/future stars, players like Obertan, Owen, and Young wouldn't have been on the agenda if we hadn't been held back in the transfer, our one big money signing in the midst of the worse of the debt was Berbatov and he was class, but just didn't fit Fergie's style.
Anderson, Hargreaves, and to a lesser extent Young have been expensive flops since the Glazer takeover which isn't too bad really, for me 'small money' punts like Tosic, Bebe, Buttner etc just can't be counted as we were almost forced into it.
Forgot about Carrick. And I doubt that Mata was even scouted. Similarily to Di Maria, it was just a world class player becoming available.
The cheap punts (or even more expensive but unknow players) - which in my opinion is tha place when scouts can show how good they are - have been pretty bad. Hernandez great, Rafael would have been great if it wasn't for injuries and pretty much that's it. Then we have Bebe, Obertan, Diouff, Dong, Tosic and many others that failed.
It has to be said that we have bee very bad in transfer market. Even expensive signings didn't work well (Berba, Anderson, Young, Fellaini) while some were just okay (Nani and Valencia). So not very convinced if our scouts say that he's a good player.
It has to be said that we have bee very bad in transfer market. Even expensive signings didn't work well (Berba, Anderson, Young, Fellaini) while some were just okay (Nani and Valencia). So not very convinced if our scouts say that he's a good player.
Well whoscored is a bit inaccurate this season IMO. Evans having a higher rating than Herrera, Carrick, De Gea and Mata shows how bad is it.15th best player in Kyiv's europa league games according to whoscored
http://www.whoscored.com/Teams/350
He did get sent off in one of the matches, so thats obviously going to take him down a fair bit. Still thats not encouraging
. Nobody played as much as him (5 games) and got a worse rating.
Well whoscored is a bit inaccurate this season IMO. Evans having a higher rating than Herrera, Carrick, De Gea and Mata shows how bad is it.
Bought 5 defenders since Vidic and Evra.
Shaw £30m
Rojo £15m
Buttner £4m
Jones £15m
Smalling £7m
Whoscored gave David Luiz the same rating as Boateng in the 7-1 loss at the World Cup, they actually rated David Luiz as the best Brazilian on the pitch. I've no idea what criteria they use to rate defenders, but the rating clearly can't be taken seriously.Well whoscored is a bit inaccurate this season IMO. Evans having a higher rating than Herrera, Carrick, De Gea and Mata shows how bad is it.
Well whoscored is a bit inaccurate this season IMO. Evans having a higher rating than Herrera, Carrick, De Gea and Mata shows how bad is it.
Whoscored gave David Luiz the same rating as Boateng in the 7-1 loss at the World Cup, they actually made David Luiz the by far best Brazilian on the pitch. I've no idea what criteria they use to rate defenders, but the rating clearly can't be taken seriously.
I don't think Boateng had a lot to do in that game, but it was certainly a lot better than anything David Luiz did, who deserved the worst possible rating ever given to a centerback and not one that made it look like he had a decent game.Nothing more to say about that then. Boateng was an absolute beast. The less said about Luiz the better.
They take in account only "actions". For example a dribble past a player, an accurate/inaccurate pass, winning/losing possession, won/loast aerial duels. That way positioning and marking has no real effect on the rating. That's why proactive defenders (those that tackle, intercept, win aerials, make a lot of accurate passes) are rated so highly - Jones is the perfect example. Also, we apparently have a better defense than Chelsea...Whoscored gave David Luiz the same rating as Boateng in the 7-1 loss at the World Cup, they actually rated David Luiz as the best Brazilian on the pitch. I've no idea what criteria they use to rate defenders, but the rating clearly can't be taken seriously.
I think he knows we need to attack more and it won't happen unless we sign a defender now. We cannot afford to be dropping more points because we are having to be too defensive. That Top 4 is vital, especially to attract the right players in the summer. Shaw, Herrera(who actually gave up CL to come to us) and Rojo would have come here anyway. Real wanted rid of ADM and PSG couldn't get him because of FFP, Falcao was touted about and we were the only ones who bit. Next season we will be going for players who CL will be the deciding factor. We lost potential signing this season because we weren't in it.I can't get excited about this signing. I'd rather we wait till summer and get either Hummels or Godin instead of signing someone who isn't in top tier.
Well whoscored is a bit inaccurate this season IMO. Evans having a higher rating than Herrera, Carrick, De Gea and Mata shows how bad is it.
Whoscored can feck off. Just watch the game. It's not hard.
You can't watch all 20 teams in a league or every team in Europe. Can be a useful way of seeing who's end product's lacking and who ups their image with workrate over defensive solidity (Matic, Fernandinho, Jedinak).
Vidic MkII. Rojo is going to be Ferdinand MkII.
On the topic of Rojo, I loved the way he had a personal battle with Zamora and kept him in his pocket all game. Reminded me of the way Ferdinand used to pick out an attacker who could be a potential issue and make their life a misery all game by bullying them and not giving then an inch.
It's the mark of a weirdo, I reckon. I don't watch Ukrainian football so don't comment on the players there. I certainly don't list off some daft stats and then pretend as if I'm informed in any kind of realistic way.
If you watch a player and can use statistics to support an argument then I'm inclined to take more interest.
It's the mark of a weirdo, I reckon. I don't watch Ukrainian football so don't comment on the players there. I certainly don't list off some daft stats and then pretend as if I'm informed in any kind of realistic way.
If you watch a player and can use statistics to support an argument then I'm inclined to take more interest.
Not saying that all stats are daft, but that's a perfect example of how they can skew your perception: they don't take into account the quality of the competition. There could easily be players better than Lacazette around, but have worse statistics because they're playing in a harder league, or because their teammates are lower quality in relation to their opponents, and so on. I think stats are a good way to back up your opinion on a player, but they're not good as the sole basis of your opinion.How are the stats daft? Take lacazette for example I know just from reading whoscored that he is the most talented young striker in Europe this season, I don't watch French football so I wouldn't know anything.
So we've had views ranging from he's absolutely brilliant, to he's utter shit?
Looks like none of us have a clue in all honesty. Could be the next Vidic, could be the next Buttner.
Because there are actually ppl that watched him a lot more than just on some freaking YoutTube vids.
You won't get many better CBs at that age. Simple as.
I'll leave it at that this thread is a disaster with too many ppl that have never even heard his name suddenly coming out and claiming he wasn't good enough.