Wheeler saying United will take £60 + add ons from chelsea
Alejandro Garnacho (out) | Chelsea make enquiries
- Thread starter Luca[4]
- Start date
We truly didn't know how good we had it
It's an overexaggeration, but we should have a marked up fee when selling to rival PL clubs.
It's been done to us for years.
Yeah, that is fine. Sell
I’ve never seen a fan so desperate to sell a player before
Few are at the required level aged 20. He has his faults but he’s also shown some great things at such a young age. Gone appear to be the days when we give youngsters time. He’s a kid. He shouldn’t be starting so frequently for such a high profile dysfunctional side. In an ideal world he’s rotated in and out with more experienced players and the team doesn’t shit the bed on a weekly basis.
Good fecking grief. How is there not a Premier League/rival tax here?
We gave them £60 million for that waster, Mount, with a year left on his contract. Now we'll accept £60 million for a young talented winger with 3 or 4 year left on his deal.
The same winger is 4 years younger than Mudryk who they paid £80-100 million for and Garnacho already has more goals and assists than him in his career.
What is this club doing?
Which leads him to take stupid shots and not play as a team member.
But but 60 million plus add ons…
Nkunku, Mudryk, Chukwuemeka, Tyrique George
Nani is one of the mot overrated players of all time for United.
Even Rashford was handsdown better.
Nani playing upfront with Hojlund instead of rooney would have been hilarious to watch
A purple patch of one season masked by playing as a squad player in arguably one of the two best United teams of all time.
Even Rashford was handsdown better.
Nani playing upfront with Hojlund instead of rooney would have been hilarious to watch
A purple patch of one season masked by playing as a squad player in arguably one of the two best United teams of all time.
No it's just sensible.I’ve never seen a fan so desperate to sell a player before
If we set our expectations after two of the dumbest deals in recent memory, we won’t make many sales.
Mount being a terrible buy at 60m, doesn’t mean Garnacho is a terrible sale at the same price.
This is why we want to sell him. The stuff about system etc is all bullshit.
You've shown consistently that you're clueless, laugh away
He was also far more intelligent on the pitch.
It's irrelevant from each other, but you still can't ignore those numbers. Mudryk, a lesser known winger from the Ukraine for 89m (incl. addons) and Mount for 60m, while we gave them Sancho for cheap and now these greedy feckers want to hijack Garnacho, but only willing to pay 59m. It's unacceptable.
Then United are stupid, Chelsea paid far more than that for Mudryk who had achieved a lot less in a weaker league. 100M should be the bare minimum we take from that mob.
No it's not.
JokesNani is one of the mot overrated players of all time for United.
Even Rashford was handsdown better.
Nani playing upfront with Hojlund instead of rooney would have been hilarious to watch
A purple patch of one season masked by playing as a squad player in arguably one of the two best United teams of all time.
Watch again
I would keep him and use a front 3 of him Zirkzee and Amad.
We shouldn't sell our best youngsters. We're Utd; not Chelsea/City.
The season is a write off anyway. Get the wingback and striker in the summer.
We shouldn't sell our best youngsters. We're Utd; not Chelsea/City.
The season is a write off anyway. Get the wingback and striker in the summer.
We must sell In order to bring 2-3 players. Given that nobody wants Casemiro, Rashford, Eriksen, Lindelof and the list goes on, he is the one player that can fetch a good amount.
United does not have the luxury to sell a player over the odds. It's common knowledge that we dont have the money for the players we want, and we can not be stubborn with the price. He is a player that does not start under Amorim, has had a few off the pitch moments with 2 coaches so far, and we desperately need players for other positions. Yeah, we can be stubborn and demand 80m pounds and nobody is willing to pay that, however, if he stays, we have holes all over the team, a player that openly said that he wouldn't mind leaving and a player that does not fit into the coaches philosophy.
I rather we get 3 more players in, sell him 10m pounds less, and start implementing those players until the summer.
So what will £60m translate to in terms of what we can spend without violating PSR?
So next time we want to buy a player do we go back to how much we paid for Antony and then make sure we offer an additional 20m to be consistent?
Mudryk was £62 million but I hear your point.
Obviously it is - what on earth are you rambling on about
Fairly irrelevant since we're short on actual money, but up to 300m if amortised over five years
I mean what the actually feck is going on with this club at the minute? Selling Garnacho? let alone selling him to Chelsea? Its feels like we’re hitting rock bottom right now, the negativity is awful.
PSR, redundancies, selling some of our most promising players.
I just don’t know what to make of all this bollocks to be honest.
Why couldn’t that Arab fella been real and not just an AI creation to make us all think Ratcliffe was a good idea
PSR, redundancies, selling some of our most promising players.
I just don’t know what to make of all this bollocks to be honest.
Why couldn’t that Arab fella been real and not just an AI creation to make us all think Ratcliffe was a good idea
feckton of boni (that he'll likely never reach) on top, right?
Selling him feels wrong.
Selling him to Chelsea feels dirty.
Selling him to Chelsea feels dirty.
I'd be genuinely curious what attributes you think he has exhibited that make him a player that we should be worried about losing?
Adds nothing to the discussion
If we are talking about a Puskas award winning 20 year old who is among the best young talents in European football sure.
Yeah, but those deals say nothing about Garnacho’s actual market value. Do you think the club is going to go: “Look, we overpaid for Mount, so you gotta cut us some slack here”? It doesn’t work like that. Look at each deal individually - does it enable us to move forward?
You can reasonably argue that 60m isn’t enough for Garnacho, but it has nothing to do with the Mount or Mudryk transfers.
I’d ask two things. 1) Would you be thrilled to buy Garnacho for 60m, if the clubs were reversed? 2) What are Chelsea fans thinking of this?
I generally think selling him could be the right move, but to sell him to a direct competitor in England for a discount is mind-bogglingly stupid. The quoted amounts are half what they spent on Moises Caicedo, FFS. Either they pay up in line with what they've spent on lesser players (Mudryk, et al) or they can do one.
I don't feel Garnacho is as great as people think. He obviously has huge potential but we do need wing backs for the system.
I'd rather it be Garnacho than Mainoo
I'd rather it be Garnacho than Mainoo