Ok so purely on goals and assists for us, Garnacho averages a goal and assist every 149.03 mins, Nani over his career with us averaged a goal and assist every 149.66 mins. So on what they have produced alone, I’d say that’s factually even. What would you say?
It’s quite fair to claim Garnacho is better than Nani was at the same age. Garnacho was more productive last season in the Premier League, in a shit team, than Nani was in a far weaker league.
Nani was much faster though, more two-footed, a better dribbler and could vary his game more. He became even better when he adapted his game and became more direct - did that happen when he destroyed Clichy for pace? Before that he tried too many tricks which slowed down the game too much.
See my post 2 above, your being very pedantic when I have explained what I was saying to you.
Absolutely and I think he can and why I don’t think we should be looking to sell him.
Yeah that’s fine. I haven’t read any of the last page, it’s very pointless.
Because people on here are fecking thick. We can all argue about how high Garnacho's potential might actually be, but his goal and assist output is amongst the best in the world for a player his age, and he's doing that in the EPL for a struggling team!
I know one thing for sure, Garnacho will never have a goal celebration to match Nani's
Don’t bother, most have made their minds up that we should just give him away and reinvest.
It's also unlikely he'll score a long distance rocket off his weak footI know one thing for sure, Garnacho will never have a goal celebration to match Nani's
nope I didn’t count those, I counted first team games only.
The poster clearly compared 20yo Garnacho to 20yo Nani initially
Mate not worth the ban! I do think it’s ridiculous that everyone is on board with this, we are not a soulless club like Chelsea or city.
Haha you took what I said to mean he had already reached them, you said Nani was significantly a better player than Garnacho and that was a fact. Their g/a to minutes on the pitch isn’t that much different no matter how you look at it and that’s not taking into account Nani playing in one of the best teams we’ve ever had compared to one of the worst.
Moneyball, Spoons.
The problem we're trying to solve is that there are rich teams and there are poor teams. Then there's fifty feet of crap, and then there's us. It's an unfair game. And now we've been gutted.
The media have made more out of this January window than any I've ever seen. It's business as usual for clubs in January, as in naff alls happening
Was thinking that the other day. Surely we wouldn't sell him without replacement, right?!
Assuming Rashford is leaving, and if we sell Garnacho, we'll be left with the following for the front 3 positions- Hojlund, Zirkzee, Bruno, Amad, Mount (who it would be insane to rely on to stay fit) and Antony ( who might leave himself, even if he doesn't having him as a #10 option makes me want to cry).
