Absolutely and I think he can and why I don’t think we should be looking to sell him.
Alejandro Garnacho (out) | Chelsea make enquiries
- Thread starter Luca[4]
- Start date
- Status
Not a bad offer but I've got no idea who we could bring in for a similar amount to improve us in the attacking midfield area. Unless we use the money to bring in a Kerkez or Ait-Nouri to reinforce that area. Can't really see the other in doing it this month though. We are threadbare with Rashford and Garna out of the lineup.
Maybe we could bring in someone like Nkunku on loan? Every time I watch him im really impressed.
Maybe we could bring in someone like Nkunku on loan? Every time I watch him im really impressed.
Why? That’s ridiculously low.
Can't believe we are considering selling Garnacho
Make it €60m and another €10-15m in add-ons and we should definitely take it.
Yeah that’s fine. I haven’t read any of the last page, it’s very pointless.
Why sell him?
Who’s the replacement?
Who are we getting for around £50m?
Mount cost us more than that.
Who’s the replacement?
Who are we getting for around £50m?
Mount cost us more than that.
Because people on here are fecking thick. We can all argue about how high Garnacho's potential might actually be, but his goal and assist output is amongst the best in the world for a player his age, and he's doing that in the EPL for a struggling team!
Can you imagine how much that would cost to replace?!
Can't believe people in here want him not only sold but for such a shitty fee. Madness.
I know one thing for sure, Garnacho will never have a goal celebration to match Nani's
Don’t bother, most have made their minds up that we should just give him away and reinvest.
No. Garnacho’s stats for the Man Utd first team are a goal/assist every 176 minutes on transfermarket. I suspect you’ve included Garnacho’s u18 and other youth team stats to get to that number.
What a player does at youth levels is not comparable to what a player does at PL and CL levels.
It's also unlikely he'll score a long distance rocket off his weak footI know one thing for sure, Garnacho will never have a goal celebration to match Nani's
nope I didn’t count those, I counted first team games only.
Bud, you’ve since admitted Garnacho “might” reach those levels after claiming he already had. Make your mind up.
If we are considering a sale, I think we have to be asking for at least £60m. Not sure it would be worth it for much less.
The poster clearly compared 20yo Garnacho to 20yo Nani initially
Jeez people losing their sheesh over a fee United haven’t agreed to sell him for 
Mate not worth the ban! I do think it’s ridiculous that everyone is on board with this, we are not a soulless club like Chelsea or city.
Last edited:
60m pounds, not euros.
Haha you took what I said to mean he had already reached them, you said Nani was significantly a better player than Garnacho and that was a fact. Their g/a to minutes on the pitch isn’t that much different no matter how you look at it and that’s not taking into account Nani playing in one of the best teams we’ve ever had compared to one of the worst.
Nobody is selling anybody at that fee. Napoli are memeing with those offers.
So, how does it work out...if we sell him for £60m do we get to spend the whole fee in Jan? Or would we able to spend more due to Klarna, Mike? Selling and leaving us with lack of options upfront...doesn't appeal to me.
Moneyball, Spoons.
But seriously, I’d only be considering a sale if the club thinks he’s not up to scratch or has attitude problems.
Not his biggest fan but wouldn’t sell him for anything below 80-100M GBP. He is young, has a good end-product and one of our very few players who has some pace on him. While the current formation does not support wingers: a) he is very young and should be able to adjust as a No. 10, b) no guarantee that Amorim would be here long term.
Selling him for what Napoli is offering would be ridiculous, that is basically somewhere in between what we paid for Zirkzee and Mount, far less than Hojlund Sancho or Antony, all worse players than him. It would be extremely hard to get a better player, especially if young, for that amount of money
Selling him for what Napoli is offering would be ridiculous, that is basically somewhere in between what we paid for Zirkzee and Mount, far less than Hojlund Sancho or Antony, all worse players than him. It would be extremely hard to get a better player, especially if young, for that amount of money
Disregarding the pros and cons of selling Garnacho, the fact that with just 2 weeks to go this window we've not heard a peep as to who might be his replacement, makes me quite certain we won't be selling him this window.
The problem we're trying to solve is that there are rich teams and there are poor teams. Then there's fifty feet of crap, and then there's us. It's an unfair game. And now we've been gutted.
Spoons, you're still trying to replace Garnacho. I told you we can't do it, and we can't do it. Now, what we might be able to do is re-create him. Re-create him in the aggregate.
The media have made more out of this January window than any I've ever seen. It's business as usual for clubs in January, as in naff alls happening
Was thinking that the other day. Surely we wouldn't sell him without replacement, right?!
Problem is I enjoy winning the odd game and doing the likes of Arsenal and City over. I don't like PSR and the blinking loophole. And bring back your podcast, Mike.
We want that Kvara money in full!!
We need a Redcafe ban on all Twitter accounts advertising Stake in their posts.
Assuming Rashford is leaving, and if we sell Garnacho, we'll be left with the following for the front 3 positions- Hojlund, Zirkzee, Bruno, Amad, Mount (who it would be insane to rely on to stay fit) and Antony ( who might leave himself, even if he doesn't having him as a #10 option makes me want to cry).
So it would be utter madness to sell Garnacho now. Any player we want to buy to replace him would be massively overpriced and would arrive under immense pressure. Even if we do want to sell, it should absolutely wait until the summer.
Just for context. If we sell him for £50m. That’s 50m instant profit.
To re-invest that in 1 transaction that is £250m. £250m player that gets you spread across a 5 year contract. This is why this sale makes good business.
To re-invest that in 1 transaction that is £250m. £250m player that gets you spread across a 5 year contract. This is why this sale makes good business.
Are they drunk? Off by £10m and another 5m in bonus for me.
This is incredibly shortsighted and only kicks the can down the road
Yeah that is a game changer in terms of what United can do in the market no doubt. The only worry I have is if we sell him we don't really have any pace left at all to stretch teams. I don't actually think he's all that, but if we don't replace him we're worse off.
It depends on who they spend the money on.
Garnacho is only starting because we are short of attackers. As good as he is, he's not ready to start, and we need someone who is. It's the opposite of kicking through can down the road in that regard.
Ideally we could keep him, back his development and supplement the squad but if we have no cash, and his attitude is not 100%, and the offer is good then a sale makes sense.
This
- Status