Alejandro Garnacho (out) | Chelsea make enquiries
- Thread starter Luca[4]
- Start date
- Status
Siôr Menfflllywyndes and Christopher Vivell could make quite the team.
I feel like the answer to this question is always Chelsea
Chelsea's business strategy appears to be to buy every player in the world, thus removing all competition and winning everything by default
Tbf that's a great quality, most of the talented youngsters who fail in the PL are because they can't get themselves into games to have any influence. He's almost always dangerous, which is why he made it so far in the PL not looking out of place.
So this is how it works. Just disagree with a well made point without bothering to explain your rationale.
I'm against selling to Chelsea unless it's a major fee. He's not a liability like Rashford or Sancho, and far from it.
We're only selling him as he doesn't fit the system, essentially. He's 20, has buckets of talent, and a strong mentality on the pitch.
They've been paying 100m for any old cnut these days so Garnacho should be worth that to them. Otherwise, feck off!
We're only selling him as he doesn't fit the system, essentially. He's 20, has buckets of talent, and a strong mentality on the pitch.
They've been paying 100m for any old cnut these days so Garnacho should be worth that to them. Otherwise, feck off!
Last 3 games, he has set up 3 big chances by going on the outside. If anything, how Garnacho has responded to being benched has impressed me very much. He shows he’s willing to learn and improve. Look at his assist against Liverpool for Amad, assist for Bruno against Arsenal and the 2 times the crossed it in, but there was no one in the middle, and the cross to Antony against Southampton.
I can’t believe that you’re making a comment about him being unable to go on the outside after watching those 3 games. He clearly has a lot more to learn to play this system, but he’s very coach able and has a high ceiling.
I also like the fact that he’s deleted his social media account, and that seems to have come from the manager.
He’s making all the right decisions to fight for his place, unlike Rashford, and if it wasn’t for PSR - United would no way consider selling him.
Then you're left with a player your manager doesn't like and less money to buy ones he does.
If he cheered up a bit, used his brain a bit more often and finished more chances, there is definitely a player in there.
I'd say Amad is the only player I don't want sold but Garnacho is our only player with genuine pace. I'd keep him unless it's a silly offer. If we had a top striker, Amad/Garnacho/New Striker could be good going forward
I'd say Amad is the only player I don't want sold but Garnacho is our only player with genuine pace. I'd keep him unless it's a silly offer. If we had a top striker, Amad/Garnacho/New Striker could be good going forward
That isn't true. There are other teams interested.
It won't be the worst decision in thee world for us to keep him until the summer and reassess either. He'll get plenty of game-time.
I'm not convinced Amorim doesn't like him. He's clearly struggling to find his role in the new setup, but he's showing progress and has been singled out for that by the coach
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 19,565
- Supports
️
Call me mystic Meg but I think Southampton will get relegated.
Feel like the last time they did, they still got good fees for some of their players
They got over £50m for Lavia when they were relegated though they had spent around £15m to get him from City and City had a 20% sell on clause.
I'm assuming Dibling is an academy product, so they don't need to take into account how much they paid for him or any sell on clauses.
Once they’re down his contract is up in 12 months, so they’re not in a good position to retain him.
If we sell him for 50m or more and replace with a similar or better talent in Dibling, I wouldn’t complain
Alexa, what's kneejerk?
Well if they're in a rush, pay what we want or look elsewhere. Quite simple really if you don't want a drawn-out process.
So posters on here are willing to get rid of a youngster from our academy who has potential and still has a long way to go because he does not fit in the #10 role, and want to replace him with an unproven right winger whose stats/numbers are nowhere Garnacho’s, to fit him in a position he has never played in. Only on the caf.
which player are you referring to?
Southampton's Dibling
There are posts calling out selling Garnacho and getting in Tyler Dibling.
Dibling looked exciting, no idea if he can fit in our system though
He is definitely exciting and if we were playing 4-3-3, I would love to take a relatively inexpensive chance on him as a project.
However, posts calling out buying him to replace Garnacho are laughable at best.
He did dribble past our defence twice on Thursday, though.
It’s a case of grass being greener across the fence.
Don't think anyone mentioned him as being interesting for us at all before Thursday
yeah true
but 50% of the posts in the football forum are laughable
there was endless debate in rashford thread on the economics of why we won't get a good fee for him, when it's blindingly obvious we won't
As a right winger. We have no idea what his potential is like as a winger, let alone as a #10, where he has almost no experience.
Don’t get me wrong, I think he is potentially an exciting prospect, but posters wanting to sell Garnacho as they have no patience for a 20 year old, only to suggest Dibling as a replacement in the same post is just silly.
Maybe go look in his thread in the football section which was created in September...
Aye, sorry I was being sarcastic and agreeing with you.
More to do with the fact that he's not all that.
No
aah, sorry. However you never know on the cafI think selling him would be a mistake. Is he the second coming of Ronaldo, probably not but I still feel like selling a talent like him would me a mistake.
It’s all just clickbait nonsense.
He is going nowhere.
Why would we sell him, make the squad weaker when we cannot even spend the money this window anyway.
Let’s be thankful that we’re getting £25m at the end of the season from Chelsea for Sancho.
He is going nowhere.
Why would we sell him, make the squad weaker when we cannot even spend the money this window anyway.
Let’s be thankful that we’re getting £25m at the end of the season from Chelsea for Sancho.
It's just not clickbait though is it.
Is he likely to go in January? Probably not, but there is clearly interest, which is backed up by multiple credible sources.
A whooping 107 posts before our match, with half of them asking who he is and how he plays like
- Status