AndySmith1990
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Messages
- 7,604
Hopefully they come back with £55m and the deal gets done
Check where he played for Atalanta youth teams then you’ll get what I meant. He trained most of career as a 10Amad has played RW 111 times and AM/10 19 times. So no he really hasn’t.
He’s just technically gifted.
A lot of similarities.All speed no brain. Argentine Rashford.
We don't play with wingers, which is one of the reasons why we would entertain selling Garnacho. Cunha is signing a new deal with Wolves if he hasn't already.Before the window opened the 3 players I wanted for left wing were Cunha/Kvarat/Marmoush. Kvarat has gone to PSG and Marmosh to City, I'm fine with selling Garnacho as long as we bring in a high quality left winger and see no one realistic better than Cunha.
Did he? Can you show me?Check where he played for Atalanta youth teams then you’ll get what I meant. He trained most of career as a 10
Cunha can play as a 10, posters on here argued in the past that we shouldn't sign him since he was a 10 and not a winger.We don't play with wingers, which is one of the reasons why we would entertain selling Garnacho. Cunha is signing a new deal with Wolves if he hasn't already.
Yes. And you can go and research yourselfDid he? Can you show me?
So you can't then.Yes. And you can go and research yourself
It’s just what I linked you doesn’t show it. Nor does any other site.Yes. And you can go and research yourself
No I can’t be bothered, there is a difference.So you can't then.
So I should do the job for you? Why?It’s just what I linked you doesn’t show it. Nor does any other site.
So if you can save me a job here I’d appreciate it.
I'll do what I like.No I can’t be bothered, there is a difference.
If someone wants to pretend they know a player because they looked up transfermarket stats. They should go and do proper research themselves
Please refrain from jumping into conversations when I am not speaking to you. Thanks
Good on you mateI'll do what I like.
Good on you for making a fool of yourself.Good on you mate
I’m not pretending anything here.No I can’t be bothered, there is a difference.
If someone wants to pretend they know a player because they looked up transfermarket stats. They should go and do proper research themselves
Please refrain from jumping into conversations when I am not speaking to you. Thanks
Im not being weird. I telling you not to be lazy.I’m not pretending anything here.
I’m using what information I can find to judge.
You’re being really weird by not just helping me out and showing me that you are in fact correct?
Just signed new contract with wolves, he ain’t going anywhereBefore the window opened the 3 players I wanted for left wing were Cunha/Kvarat/Marmoush. Kvarat has gone to PSG and Marmosh to City, I'm fine with selling Garnacho as long as we bring in a high quality left winger and see no one realistic better than Cunha.
Because usually a conversation requires two participants.So I should do the job for you? Why?
You've got nothing. Just admit you were wrong.Im not being weird. I telling you not to be lazy.
He's being a dick, ignore him.I’m not pretending anything here.
I’m using what information I can find to judge.
You’re being really weird by not just helping me out and showing me that you are in fact correct?
Never known a player to inspire so much bickering![]()
Because usually a conversation requires two participants.
I literally cannot find a source that suggests what you said is true. Everywhere is saying what I’ve said.
Genuinely help me out here? Because it will vastly change my judgement of Garnacho if you’re correct.
Yikeserrrm, pogba?
Will be a shame. But I guess we can sign a player more suited to the systemthis is happening isn't it
will get done at around 50m is my guess
Did you watch him this evening?£38 plus add ons, now that's taking the piss.
Can anyone back up @Cassidy here because everywhere I’m looking is showing him as a RW at youth level too?
Will be a shame. But I guess we can sign a player more suited to the system
Yes, you have plenty of the former and none of the latter to back it.Conversation and research are not one and the same.
What a blufferYes, you have plenty of the former and none of the latter to back it.
CoolYes, you have plenty of the former and none of the latter to back it.