Brightonian
Full Member
Well, except that Wilshere is always injured....
Half as often as Anderson and he's twice as good. Also I vaguely remember hearing a lot of that sort of talk about RVP...
Well, except that Wilshere is always injured....
I agree with you onm both counts, a dynamic but skillfull player would have been ideal and I still think Dembele would have been a brilliant signing.
Well, except that Wilshere is always injured....
Half as often as Anderson and he's twice as good. Also I vaguely remember hearing a lot of that sort of talk about RVP...
More importantly, has he ever played in a midfield two?
I don't think he has for Arsenal or England.
Or are we just assuming because he is English he can do it?
More importantly, has he ever played in a midfield two?
I don't think he has for Arsenal or England.
Or are we just assuming because he is English he can do it?
I think he partnered Parker once in an England friendly game.
Last line is a bit silly. We are allowed to rate English players without it just being because they're English. I rate Wilshere because he's bloody brilliant.
The rest of the post is a decent point though. Common sense suggests that he could do it. He has the right attributes - a great engine, a very rounded skill-set, a good balance between attacking and defensive attributes, and superb game-intelligence, especially for his age. He actually looks a lot like a more old-fashioned sort of midfielder in a lot of ways.
That said, until he plays in a midfield two regularly, there's no way of knowing for sure if he can do it. So it's a good point. Although it's worth noting (as I seem to do a lot on transfer-related discussions) that with Rooney at number 10, we're never really playing a two-man midfield. He contributes at least as much to the midfield as, for example, Cazorla.
Sorry, sidetracking the Carrick thread a bit.
It makes you wonder the strong interest of Sneijder in the past. He's the anti-thesis of what we portray as an ideal center midfielder for United.
The first part of Durham being all gooey eyed at Carrick will start shortly.
Any good?
Yeah Carrick was good but he was in there almost completely by himself, I really don't understand what Jones was doing.
Does no one remember SAF coming out with this in preseason?
I don't know why people think Carrick-Fletcher partnership was a success. I think that's one of the most uninspiring era for our midfield when those two was in charge.
Yet, it culminated in 1/3 champions league's (finals) and two league titles when we had Hargreaves and Fletcher in the squad who are both much better defensively man for man than Carrick. Hell, we even lost a defensive partner for Carrick oand got beaten in the other two. Mental how anyone would not want another genuine ball winner in the squad.
Re above not really 'hard man' more a direct 1 on 1 ball winner. For me it's the only real ingredient that is missing from our team.
Michael Carrick: Made more forward passes against West Ham last night (53) than any player has done in a Premier League game this season
Does it mean any of our strikers during that time was better than Nistelrooy (another era with less trophies)? No. But it's just a matter of preference. I prefer we're not looking for Fletcher type as main CM.
Fecking hell. Seems like he overcompensated for all those 'passing sideway and backward' years.
That pass he made to Chicharito where he tried the flick-header...
Michael Carrick: Made more forward passes against West Ham last night (53) than any player has done in a Premier League game this season